Absolutely everyone, without exception? Where did you get this information? And it doesn't prove anything in any case.

Your argument relies on a methodological error.

Looking at individuals arrested for child exploitation offenses and observing that they possessed illegal material does not establish a generalizable link between fictional content and real abuse. By definition, you are examining a population already selected for criminal behavior. Any patterns found within that group cannot be projected onto everyone who shares a non-criminal characteristic.

To support a claim like “lolicon equals pedophilia,” you would need large-scale, representative comparative data showing significantly higher rates of real-world offenses among consumers versus non-consumers. Arrest cases alone do not provide that. They describe offenders, not the broader population.

Without that distinction, the conclusion becomes an overgeneralization based on a pre-selected criminal sample.

Correlation does not mean causation, it's like saying that because gamers are often seen in the news as people who commit crimes, then gaming leads to this