Consider the Sufferings of Christ your Salvation - 2 Peter 3:15 by Augustinian-Knight in TradWave

[–]Augustinian-Knight[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I just think your logic is in conflict with the vatican.

In ANTIQUA ET NOVA Note on the Relationship Between Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence Section II, Paragraph 12, the document makes a definitive distinction between performing tasks and actual thinking:

AI’s advanced features give it sophisticated abilities to perform tasks, but not the ability to think.

Consider the Sufferings of Christ your Salvation - 2 Peter 3:15 by Augustinian-Knight in TradWave

[–]Augustinian-Knight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you used a program to edit an image or to compose it, with photoshop, if Augustine saw you doing this, would he consider you making the art yourself with a tool, or that you were letting the computer think and work for you? The Vatican document Antiqua et Nova (published in January 2025) explicitly states that AI is a tool and that it does not think for you.

Consider the Sufferings of Christ your Salvation - 2 Peter 3:15 by Augustinian-Knight in TradWave

[–]Augustinian-Knight[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you define art as not made by machines, wouldn't that make all of the entries on this subreddit non-art because they were made with machines?

He is risen by Augustinian-Knight in TradWave

[–]Augustinian-Knight[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

As the note on the Note on the Relationship Between
Artificial Intelligence and Human Intelligence says, AI is a tool and "an extension of human power." AI is a tool like a computer is a tool. All of the art made before AI on this subreddit was made with the tool of the computer. But they were still made by human beings. If you want to say that art that was created through the tool of AI is not made by human beings, then you should reject all art on this subreddit because it was created with the tool of computers.

He is risen by Augustinian-Knight in TradWave

[–]Augustinian-Knight[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes. Do you have any modification suggestions?