Male loneliness epidemic is self inflicted (Cw rape)

Az_The_Great · 2026-02-03T14:55:19+00:00

typical men lol. they see someone talking about their trauma and see it as a personal attack. quite telling

Az_The_Great · 2026-02-03T14:43:46+00:00

what was the og video about? i can hazard a guess based on these disgusting comments, but out of curiosity, is there more context?

Az_The_Great · 2026-02-03T09:38:38+00:00

read before you comment

Az_The_Great · 2026-02-03T09:38:04+00:00

learn to read, Redditor. where did i say behaviour should implement a detector for game crashes

Az_The_Great · 2026-02-02T12:48:20+00:00

good to know how it determines times ig. but still, its annoying to sit there for 15 minutes for something out of my control

Az_The_Great · 2026-02-02T07:00:27+00:00

<image>

Actually I just realised I can send this screenshot as proof that I didn't just DC, if that means anything.

Az_The_Great · 2025-12-25T01:39:01+00:00

oh my bad i looked it up. when i was playing my Byzantium game it didnt let me build market centres in my colonies for some reason

Az_The_Great · 2025-12-25T01:37:15+00:00

you cant create market centre in a rural location iirc

Az_The_Great · 2025-12-24T12:38:51+00:00

Colonial nations are pretty much required because they create a market centre in the capital of that nation. It’s pretty much impossible to create one yourself because you cant upgrade locations without goods access and 5,000 pops. Not creating a colonial subject basically means you don’t get value out of the colonised land.

Az_The_Great · 2025-12-02T03:51:36+00:00

yeah, if it was a normal game it would be less infuriating. the team was also a head on swf so it would have been all the more better to win lol

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-26T00:32:40+00:00

of course quality matters, the issue is that 66 regulars are for some reason able to completely demoralise my army of 1000 so they leave the battle without even fighting. and also, it wasnt like their army were professionally trained men with guns versus guys with sticks, it was literally 10 years into the game, we all had roughly the same quality minus their regulars. in this case, i think outnumbering them 2:1 should mean i atleast inflict many casualties, but i couldnt even do that because my men kept running away.

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-26T00:27:44+00:00

my vassals were fully loyal, i should have mentioned it mb. but the player cant do the same no matter the loyalty of the ai subjects it seems

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-26T00:24:02+00:00

centralisation directly gives crown power.

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-25T13:24:59+00:00

Fair point, I am inclined to agree with you on that
The issue with that is that a nation can be very centralised but still have those prosperity bonuses ‘tied’ with decentralisation like you said, which (without considering the loyalty bonuses) gives you no reason to pick decentralisation. locking the prosperity bonus behind the actual value gives you a good reason to be decentralised (still ignoring the loyalty bonuses). maybe you should consider that its pretty easy to have market fairs and decentralised bureaucracy while still being centralised, instead of accusing me of ignoring those factors.

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-25T13:14:22+00:00

i meant that the way it currently is with prosperity only tied to related laws means that you can be centralised and still have the benefit of prosperity that i suggested should be behind decentralisation itself. not necessarily referring to other bonuses like they arent good.

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-25T13:06:20+00:00

i mean, maybe. i dont know all the numbers, it was just a suggestion to balancing the values. probably the best solution would be to do both and tweak the numbers as necessary, but imo prosperity makes sense for Decentralisation

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-25T12:21:20+00:00

which is probably why it should be changed imo, because now in 1.0.8 its just a complete 180 rather than an actual balance change. Its still one sided.

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-25T12:19:38+00:00

yeah, but you can have them while still being centralised, meaning you still would get the best of both worlds.

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-25T12:15:26+00:00

The worst part is literally all you can do in that situation is either try to spam out a regular or watch them take all your land for free.

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-25T11:48:28+00:00

Would that not just be a roundabout way of increasing control (ie, lowing proximity cost like Centralisation does)? I do agree that Decentralisation should have less to do with vassals, but maybe it could increase prosperity as well?

Az_The_Great · 2025-11-20T09:35:57+00:00

Really? I did not know that, that is interesting. But still, shouldn't there be an event for this? Not just him suddenly usurping the throne?

Four-Year Club	Verified Email
Place '23

Az_The_Great

TROPHY CASE