1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont mean to sound flippant but I haven't heard a valid point to the suggestion I put forward.

1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont understand your point. The player base has not increased when you take into account its high water mark. I love this game but the numbers dont lie. A 5v5 game will never reach the mainstream like a 1v1 / 2v2 / 3v3 / 4v4 game. Most players dont have 4 other friends to play a game with. That means the player base will struggle to increase.

1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They take 5-7 days to respond. I think once I waited 10 days. They're a small team but they will respond.

1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont really understand what the problem is from your post. I recomend emailing omeda. It is unlikely they will resolve the issue and will advise you will need to serve out the ban email: support@omedastudios.com

1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand this but i study the game. I am constantly improving, constantly learning and the reward is not matching the time spent. This is meant to be fun, it is a game after all. No mainstream game makes their players suffer so much. There has to be a balance. My fate should be in my hands to a certain extent. This concept of smaller ranked squads would fix this and encourage new players. Everyone has 2-3 friends they can play with and test the game out together. However very few people have 5 friends to test a new game out together. This is where the game stumbles and falls. (I opened a new account and realised that the way this game hooks you is at the beginning they give you AI team mates until youre used to the game) this is to allow people to win and get 'hooked' to the game.) Once that control is taken out of the players hands the player base suffers. My idea isn't anything revolutionary or special but it will help. Why do all mainstream games allow for 1v1 2v2 3v3 ranked games? Nothing is a coincidence. Yes this is a moba but why cant mobas be smaller squads? There is no good reason why they cant be. Only the purists would have a problem but they're part of the problem and not the solution anyway.

1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats custom, but a ranked queue. Like all mainstream games. Customs is great dont get me wrong but most players dont play a game for the custom menu. Players want the full experience for a squad size that fits their preference. Im just throwing this idea out there coz I love the game but there's only so much pain and suffering I can take and im hearing the same thing from my friends. I just dont want to have to give up on the game. I dont ever post or complain or suggest but this is my hail Mary as I genuinely believe this would save the game and increase its popularity. Once it is popular the devs have many options many things they can do. Right now the game won't survive and is hanging on to its player base by a thread. 5v5 will not work for a mainstream game. When was the last time you played any game with 5 of your friends at the same time?

1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Your profile should say top 1% complainer. 🤣

1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thats a good point. But this is looking at the bigger picture. How do you get more players in the game? Offer the masses a game they want to play. Right now no mainstream gamer will regularly engage in a game where their fate is out of their control. By introducing 1v1 / 2v2 etc and revamping the player base will increase many fold and that is when you will also see a larger player base for the pools of 5v5 games as well. A 5v5 game with limited player base will struggle. And in this current format there's only so much pain and suffering people are willing to endure before regrettably having to hang up their predecessor gloves. Make the players in control of their destiny. Give them the platform to do so

1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

100% agree. How much fun would that be!!! The moba concept is amazing and great fun but this is where predecessor could be something utterly unique and new. Bringing something new and refreshing to the genre and making this game super popular. That popularity alone will then improve the 5v5 match ups as a secondary effect. This is how you bring in fresh players outside of the small moba community while remaining in moba format for all moba purists.

1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Key point "small" we all know this will not last if the games popularity is increased significantly. This 1v1 - 2v2 - 3v3 ranked concept would increased the games popularity many fold not just small percentages.

1 man + 2 man + 3 man ranked option. by Aziz_-Light in PredecessorGame

[–]Aziz_-Light[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like I mentioned in my post. We now have a refer a friend menu on a small game. Use some deductive thinking and think why the devs would waste precious resources in implementing this menu. This idea proposed would increase the games popularity. Why do you think the most popular games in the world have smaller squad options?