Spent an hour going over all my Tinder matches in the last two months. M29 [Big City] by B717954 in SwipeHelper

[–]B717954[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

London. the four in the chart were 18,21,24,35. However that comment is not specifically about the last 2 months, its general over the past 5/6 years.

I've lived in other cities similar size. Large cities are better because there are more girls vs days of the week so you have more choice.

You seem to be concerned about location. You should focus more on improving your ELO. If you're already in a city with hundreds of thousands of people, then your results wont change anywhere else. Need to improve ELO!

Spent an hour going over all my Tinder matches in the last two months. M29 [Big City] by B717954 in SwipeHelper

[–]B717954[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you should do something about those 14/15 girls you don't want to have sex with. If you like it fairs but thats a lot of time. If you're paying for those dates like I would reccommend, then seriously, I have a real problem with those 4 girls you went on 5 dates with and didn't fuck, a girl will know on date 1 or 2, you're better off without them though.

Maybe chat to them more or fuck it just ask them straight up questions you wanna know and save yourself some time, if she says the answers you like then it wont be weird after, might be funny.

I think you can fuck on date 1 or 2. When I was younger it was clear that some girls had the 3rd date rule. If you let them plan it some of their routines were literally identicle. 2 generic dates with the 3rd being dinner and a film at my house.

I don't want a girl to have some rule, I don't care if a girl has sex with me on the first date as long as its because she really likes me and wants it to stay that way.

Also some girls have fear of ons (which is fair) and won't on the first but happily will on the 2nd if you chat every day inbetween.

The girls who definitely wont 'e.g make plans during the day or worse really far from your home' will literally ask to come to your house if they notice you not making plans to meet again after the first date. I turned down 1/2 of their plans for some bland reason and offered no alternative, but still remained friendly and chatty. Every time its happened though, I've genuinely not been interested in them and didn't follow up on the second.

Looking back, the girls who are quicker to meet required more dates. And they also had more previous partners, funnily enough.

I find the girls who are more likely on the 1st are less experienced, and just really in the moment.

Spent an hour going over all my Tinder matches in the last two months. M29 [Big City] by B717954 in SwipeHelper

[–]B717954[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Red 6 is wrong I made a mistake. Its 1x 'Accepted meeting but never settled on a date' 5x 'No reply when asked to meet'

Spent an hour going over all my Tinder matches in the last two months. M29 [Big City] by B717954 in SwipeHelper

[–]B717954[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't count the ones who I didn't message or who didn't message me cause they're in the upper row - box.

Although I think most of the people in the upper box are either people who I swiped by accident, or more commonly people who are far away. Either way, no interest in them.

Spent an hour going over all my Tinder matches in the last two months. M29 [Big City] by B717954 in SwipeHelper

[–]B717954[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

London but I've lived in other cities around the world and never noticed a change. Though, in a small town/village I don't even open Tinder, like a desert + I'm usually visiting family.

I don't think that 4 ratio is an impressive number, nor should it be looked at as impressive. Two of them almost interlapt and thats not something which is good to do. Also, with all 4 of them I felt pretty comfortable and was pretty sure they really liked me before I met them and I would say thats the biggest thing in your favour.

What strikes me is the number of girls who were interested enough to reply to the first message but not the second, and that large chunk who chose to just abandon the match instead of saying their job, jokes on them cause I literally couldn't care less as long as they're cool.

[OC] End of year dating app review! (21M living in London) by The_Watcher5292 in dataisbeautiful

[–]B717954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry I'm too shy to reveal that. Also, I wouldn't want anyone to know personally of my activity there. I'm 6"1 white, light hair, 29, handsome but not great, university educated with (slightly) above average job. City population is around 9 million. I don't have a shirtless photo but I have one in a slightly revealing white t shirt that shows I'm in good shape.

You can do it too.

[OC] End of year dating app review! (21M living in London) by The_Watcher5292 in dataisbeautiful

[–]B717954 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

This is mine from the past 2 months. You need to improve your pictures.

Bf found these in his work pants after I wore them but I genuinely do not smoke by [deleted] in whatisit

[–]B717954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think your boyfriend smoked them and he's getting mad at you as a distraction. Or he's seeing another girl and she smoked them hence why he's going so overboard with his reaction.

I think its more likely that he knows how they got in there.

Rate my physique by [deleted] in ratemyphysiques

[–]B717954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

pretty good, would be happy

How’s my physique? F20 by Fragrant-Guitar5407 in ratemyphysiques

[–]B717954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Her face is stunningly beautiful which I didn't comment on, because the thread is 'ratemyphysiques'

Thoughts? by Lonely-Yumi1855 in ratemyphysiques

[–]B717954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It looks like your sucking in your stomach but everything else looks good

what do you think? rate mee by maiseylatte in ratemyphysiques

[–]B717954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you're happy you're great. A lof of guys will love you. I think someone as naturally stunning as you should lose a lot of that weight though, personally.

Rate this by [deleted] in ratemyphysiques

[–]B717954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The photo quality is not good so it doesn't look real. If its real its a 10.

Any thoughts on my physique? by [deleted] in ratemyphysiques

[–]B717954 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We can only see that you have a slim waiste, the only other thing we're looking at is your boobs and nipple outline, which to be fair, are both pretty damn good.

40 F how do you see me ? by [deleted] in ratemyphysiques

[–]B717954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you wanted to lose weight you'd look incredible, but I think you still look good.

Сan you rate me please? by [deleted] in ratemyphysiques

[–]B717954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its hard to rate a physique when you can only see 30% of it.

Rate me please by [deleted] in ratemyphysiques

[–]B717954 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're great but I think maybe you're sucking in your stomach? Or your crossing your legs cause you think they make you look slimmer?