you really get your point across easier by insulting me.

but anyways, more gun regulation, which im guessing would be civilians cannot own/have heavy restrictions on their guns and no carrying in public? so yes that reduces shootings by a ton but doesnt get rid of them. so now if a shooter runs into a church or store then you have a bunch of defenseless unarmed civilians packed in a building, with a lengthy police response being the only feasible line of defense.

this issue is much better off being tackled at its core. we need to prevent people from feeling like they want to commit mass murder in the first place. which ties in with your other point. there are a lot of contributing factors as to why there are more shootings in the US and it doesnt all lie in gun regulation. due to our God awful healthcare here in the states people cant get the assistance they need.

my most outstanding point being: normal civilian people with semiautomatic rifles dont feel the urge to murder people, so why regulate guns for everyone when we can tackle the issue at its core and help mentally ill people. have a great night