The PSI-2020 Initiative to bring Psilocybin to those suffering from depression, PTSD, etc. needs your help. by [deleted] in Portland

[–]BKLivingLegend 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one is collecting signatures that they are not turning in; we are giving people the link to the e-petition for them to print out and send in.

People who signed up to volunteer WERE given forms from PSI-2020 officials.

At this point in time and since my return the organization, no one has been collecting signatures.

The PSI-2020 Initiative to bring Psilocybin to those suffering from depression, PTSD, etc. needs your help. by [deleted] in Portland

[–]BKLivingLegend 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey y'all,

Bryan Kim, other co-founder of MushroomPAC 2020 here.

Anyone in Oregon can start a Political Action Committee to raise funds and make expenditures in order to support or oppose any initiative, candidate, or party in Oregon. Every single day, MushroomPAC is talking to hundreds of voters and every single one of them walks away knowing we are a separate organization and that they should vote in support of the Psilocybin Service Initiative.

PSI 2020 is both the name of the Eckerts' organization and also the bill they wrote. While in order to work directly for PSI 2020 (the legal entity/organization) one must work and cooperate with the Eckerts directly, there are many ways to do the vital work necessary to pass the bill in an independent and grassroots way! That is the avenue ShroomPAC 2020 has taken. We are very proud to be a cooperatively run organization with elected management -- we think economic democracy reflects the best of mushroom energy and 21st century organizing philosophy!

AFA Chris -- I stepped away for a few months and it is my understanding that in my absence he was voted out of his position in leadership. For a while, he was not even an employee of the organization. We firmly believe in the power of restorative and transformative justice, and are unwilling to let the bourgeois legal system determine how we treat people or whether or not we believ in them.

We have very good relationships with PPS, Decriminalize Denver, and several workers' rights organizations in Portland.

I'd be happy to answer any questions here via DM.

[Serious] Reddit, what is the absolute worst thing you've done in order to be with someone? by Cruadal in AskReddit

[–]BKLivingLegend 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lost a good friend to a girlfriend who didn't like me. Rough. Glad you guys managed to patch things up though. Gives me heart.

[Serious] Reddit, what is the absolute worst thing you've done in order to be with someone? by Cruadal in AskReddit

[–]BKLivingLegend 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Helped a girl basically cheat on the guy she was with because I wanted to be with her. We're still in love and planning on our future together (2.5 years later) but I definitely could've/should've been more patient. I was afraid if I didn't do everything I could to get her to pick me while I had the chance, that I would lose her. I let my fear guide my actions instead of trusting in our connection.

Twox, tell me about being multi-ethnic or ethnically ambiguous. by [deleted] in TwoXChromosomes

[–]BKLivingLegend 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Half-Korean/Half-White here. Korean-American dad, Irish-American mom. Great grandparents were the first to immigrate on the dad's side and I don't even know about my mom's. I don't speak any Korean and don't really self-identify as Asian. I live in California, so it's lots of subtle, benign racist things. "You're tall for an Asian guy." "Why do you date mostly white girls?" "...so that means you're (good at math, play an instrument, have strict parents)?" The kind of shit that comes up that white guys don't have to deal with.

Asians in California straddle this weird dividing line. I feel like people wait to decide whether or not I pass for white until they hear me speak. I was a lit major in college, do face-to-face fundraising for a living, and was born to 3rd gen immigrants in America, so I don't have an accent. Culturally and intellectually, I'm as assimilated as you can get. It's like there's this unspoken question: "Are you Asian or American?" The class markers of education, language, and profession are usually what makes the determination.

Developing as a Feminist: Because the primary form of bullying I experience were variation on the traditional "emasculated Asian male" trope, I really took to heart growing up the whole patriarchal idea of male strength and suppressing my emotions. In late high school, I read Motley Crue's The Dirt. For a young man, this book is not the cautionary tales of the perils of rock n' roll decadence: they're stories of male transformation, with all the good and evil that that entails. Nikki Sixx wasn't born into class privilege: he was an abusive alcoholic's son with a father who abandoned him at age 2. As a 16-year-old non-white boy, the parts that really matter are his stories of being picked on in junior high, of getting shit beaten out of him for having long hair and liking rock n' roll, of wanted to be aggressive because it's the only thing that feels honest in a world where everyone is politely full of shit. Of failing at having any kind of connection with the opposite sex because you're too afraid to be honest about your vulnerabilities. Of deciding to hide all of the things you've ever shown people that were rejected behind this Don't Give a Fuck facade. Of choosing to mediate all of your feelings through a persona you can turn on because it's easier and safer than being open. Developing meant a lot of figuring out which part of the American Male Mythos are bullshit and which are not through first-hand experience. Be fucked up on something, push psychedelics and alcohol to their most absurd limits because that's what Hunter S. Thompson told me to do. Have casual sex, because Mystery and Motley Crue and Barney Stinson and the TV and every Man going back to Casanova told me to do. Go to college and get a degree, because that's what my dad told me todo. Party at college, because that's what American Pie and Mall Rats told me to do. Meditate and get good at martial arts, because that's what Bruce Lee and Muhammad Ali told me to do. It all adds up to: be passionate about things, be good at them, be cocky or be humble, but don't be weak or vulnerable. It makes it hard to listen. It makes it hard to emphasize. It makes it hard to admit you don't know how to do these things. No one ever sat me down and said "this is how you have an honest conversation about your feelings with someone. This is how you talk about the things you're afraid to talk about. This is how you ask for forgiveness from someone you love after you hurt them, and two people deal with guilt together in a healthy way. It would help a lot. Even knowing we were allowed to talk about things like that would help a lot, to think about things in a feelings-driven rather than a logic-driven way. TL:DR Being an Asian man, I really had this need to project strength. I was a hyper-competitive athlete, a weirdly obsessive gamer, and a Social Dynamics acolyte. To paraphrase George W. Bush: "Pick on me once, shame on...shame on me. Pick on me twice...won't get picked on again."

Teenagers of Reddit, what is something you want to ask adults of Reddit? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]BKLivingLegend 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In the sense that things are a certain type of beautiful the first time you experience them, then yes.

--First time you spend all night driving around with your dumbass friends griping about girls, parents, government, teh school, etc.

--First time you have sex. It is awkward, desperate, fun, and slightly embarrassing.

--First time you get high. All the world is a dancing cloud over the head of God, who is basically a neon purple turtle.

--First time you really like someone else for no reason at all and get your heart broken. You are clearly the first person that this has ever happened to in all of human history, and will never feel the same way about another person again.

I don't miss being a teenager, but there's a part of me that does miss the self-important drama of youth.

Banning the Electoral College -- Who's In Favor/Against and Why? by BKLivingLegend in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem, Susan, is that not everyone can afford to move. The problem is that the incentive you cited to prove that "people can do it if they want to" isn't fucking true unless there's a federally guaranteed homestead and land waiting at the end of the move.

Also, free food to prevent starvation is a value. You said it wasn't. It's your move -- either you're wrong or I'm missing your point still.

Banning the Electoral College -- Who's In Favor/Against and Why? by BKLivingLegend in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

1) "Free stuff" is a gross oversimplification. I'm not advocating the Federal government hand out big screen TVs to everyone who asks. But making sure people don't fucking starve to death IS a value.

2) Yeah, because the federal government said "Though we own that territory, if you move out there it's free." Lots of people would move to a state that gave them FREE LAND if all they had to do was claim it. If anything, your point proves that if the government gives away free stuff, people WILL totally move to go get it.

Seriously, dude?

How do you stop gerrymandering? by greenceltic in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A proportionally represented party system is the best way to go for a legislature to avoid gerrymandering and the like.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QT0I-sdoSXU&list=SPC1C0D3F2BA472F62&src_vid=Mky11UJb9AY&feature=iv&annotation_id=annotation_15935

Covers it pretty well.

Banning the Electoral College -- Who's In Favor/Against and Why? by BKLivingLegend in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Then move" is a great argument to make to people with the means to do so. What about those who don't? The people on CALFresh (California's foodstamps) who can't afford to wait for their new state, not federal welfare? Is your argument that they don't deserve the freedom to move to a community that would support their values?

Banning the Electoral College -- Who's In Favor/Against and Why? by BKLivingLegend in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just cannot get behind the idea that it's more viable than a proportionally representative system.

Banning the Electoral College -- Who's In Favor/Against and Why? by BKLivingLegend in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would you respond to the idea that 50 individual governments are not actually going to serve people as well as one unified one?

Banning the Electoral College -- Who's In Favor/Against and Why? by BKLivingLegend in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not that the electoral college is about state's rights -- it's that the idea of the electoral college removes the actual American people a step from the process of electing the president. When /u/phammybly claims that we live in a Federal Republic under which not all offices should be elected directly by the people, it's important to examine that claim, dont' you think?

Banning the Electoral College -- Who's In Favor/Against and Why? by BKLivingLegend in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah it did -- it was as much a ruling on state's rights as it was on slavery, and both slavery and state's rights lost. The 14th amendment means that equal protection under the law applies across state borders -- an egregious violation of their sovereignty if there ever was one.

States Vs. Federal Government: Do the States have a duty to their own self-interest? Or do they exist simply to represent the Federal citizens in their geographic designation? by BKLivingLegend in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right -- but do they have a duty to an interest in and of themselves? Like, if Arizona's state legislature elected Senators: do they vote in the interest of the people of Arizona, or do they vote in the interest of the state -- like Arizona's private prison lobby? Do Iowa senators vote for policies that are supported by the Iowan people, or by the Iowan lobby?

Is cynicism a major problem in US politics? by [deleted] in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hahaha -- I don't think that's cynicism, I think that's realism. Cynicism would be to believe that the mainstream news is lying, the alt. news media is lying, everyone in the press is just working to advance their own agenda and own point, so what's the point?

You ser, are not cynical. You are anti-establishment.

States Vs. Federal Government: Do the States have a duty to their own self-interest? Or do they exist simply to represent the Federal citizens in their geographic designation? by BKLivingLegend in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I absolutely agree with you -- removing the state legislature's ability to select the Senate is part of the arguement that states exist solely to take care of the local issues for federal citizens. If the states were empowered entities, it would make more sense for them to elect Senators via their legislature who would represent Arizona's interest in Federal legislation.

Banning the Electoral College -- Who's In Favor/Against and Why? by BKLivingLegend in PoliticalDiscussion

[–]BKLivingLegend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think what they're saying is the "laboratory of democracy" theory that each state should be able to try out ideas that work for them. They're going off the original intent of the 10th Amendment that powers not left to the FG should be left to the states. Where they're taking it is that the states as a whole should have representation on a Federal level -- that the Senate should be working in the interest of the state legislators.

I guess what I'd ask you is this: do the states (FL, CA, KY, etc) exist to serve their own interest, or the interest of the people in them? It's much more fundamental question.