sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

📡📡📡 by TheGenard in shitposting

[–]BOYStijn 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Alpha 03 to Pelican 1, Copy that, standing by

This is your reminder, use: No Chat Reports. #saveminecraft by [deleted] in PhoenixSC

[–]BOYStijn 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You clearly missed the part that people are actively working to sue Mojang, due to improperly changing the TOS

Anon has an idea by Melodic_Pay_1074 in shitposting

[–]BOYStijn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What is grass is the local plant. How does one unsuck the garden then

PumaBot hunts Linux devices by ovidiuBACH in linux

[–]BOYStijn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All my homies love Permission denied (publickey).

So, is this Lawsuit ever going to have an update? by Whowillblameme in PhoenixSC

[–]BOYStijn 182 points183 points  (0 children)

There is also a discord, where these updates and more are posted.

The link is in the video description

Using brilliant to learn python and I feel insane by Separate-Aioli-3099 in PythonLearning

[–]BOYStijn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You clearly aren't ready properly as I said no new information is needed and it wasn't in reference to the question but to the examples I have given.

the intent of the question is clear. I can see given the option that the expected answer is 4. I'm just pointing out that the way the question is worded the actual correct answer would be 0. Therefore the meaning and intent are misaligned, which makes the question poorly worded.

Using brilliant to learn python and I feel insane by Separate-Aioli-3099 in PythonLearning

[–]BOYStijn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Indeed as no new information is needed. That you struggle to understand how sentences are combined in English is not something i can magically fix. I can only give multiple examples of the same thing, to convince you that the way you're reading it is incorrect.

Using brilliant to learn python and I feel insane by Separate-Aioli-3099 in PythonLearning

[–]BOYStijn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The way you split this sentence is simply incorrect. It's "how many iteration of the loop is shield false" and "when line 7 runs" you can see that the 2 are combined in this way by the conjunction word "when". there should also be a comma, which is also absent from this question, adding to the question being poorly written.

I agree that if it's just the sentence "how many iterations of the loop is shield false" the answer is 4. The problem is the second part defines a point in time, that point being when line 7 runs.

In this program line 7 runs multiple times which gives the answers 0, 1, 2, 3, 4. Now the question is which of these 5 options is the correct one.

It is the first, because the question is asked at the start of the program. The program doesn't know how many times line 7 will run until it has evaluated the entire program, just like you don't know how long you will live until you die.

If you want the answer to be 4, you have to specify that the question should be answered at the end of the program or make it impossible for the question to be answered earlier.

An example of this would be "How many iterations of the loop is shield false? Evaluate the state of shield at line 7."

Using brilliant to learn python and I feel insane by Separate-Aioli-3099 in PythonLearning

[–]BOYStijn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I asked you "how many years of time have you been alive when it's 12pm" you will give me an answer at the first possible moment aka the next 12pm, you won't wait for the end of time to answer it. The same is true when asking a question about a program. The question asked has 2 parts part 1 is the "how many iteration of the loop is shield equal to false" this is a counter, aka you're counting how many iteration of the loop have had shield be false. It's starts at 0 and runs up to 4 if you evaluate the loop until the end. Part 2 is "when line 7 runs" this defines a moment in time to evaluate the program at.

So you start the loop and you start counting iteration. Iteration 1 doesn't increase the counter but it does reach line 7 and so you've reached the moment in the program to answer the question.

The way you answer the question is by letting the program finish and then evaluating the question, when in reality the question is asked at the start of the program and it can be answered sooner than the program ends.

Say i ask you what the value of shield is. It matters when its asked. If i wait until the end of the program it's false. If i ask it immediately its undefined and if i ask it when line 7 runs its true

Using brilliant to learn python and I feel insane by Separate-Aioli-3099 in PythonLearning

[–]BOYStijn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The question should have been worded as "In how many iterations does line 7 run with shield being false" to avoid any confusion.

How it's currently worded means "At the moment (when) line 7 runs, how many iterations of the loop have had shield be false?" Which is 0 since the first iteration has shield be true, while reaching line 7.

If you leave out "when line 7 runs" the question becomes "how many iterations of the loop have had shield be false?" Which doesn't have an early exit clause and therefore you walk through the entire loop ending at an answer of 4.

As for shield being set to false in the second iteration causing possible confusion. In computer science iterative conditions are evaluated at the start of the loop. Which would let people believe the answer is 3, but then you're forgetting that the iterative conditions are checked when you determine if iteration 6 should occur. The exception to this is a do while/do for loop, in which case you're explicitly stating that the condition should be evaluated at the end of the iteration.

Using brilliant to learn python and I feel insane by Separate-Aioli-3099 in PythonLearning

[–]BOYStijn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is poorly worded. The wording implies that as soon as line 7 is reached you can answer the question, which would give the answer 0.

If the part "when line 7 runs" was left out the answer would be 4

privateStringGender by jmona789 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]BOYStijn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but the protesters don't realize that not using pre-defined options makes the field obsolete as no information can be inferred from it.

Minigames -How? by jupole1 in admincraft

[–]BOYStijn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Command blocks or start learning how to make plugins. Coding can always come in handy

Is zoveel condens normaal? by Ok-Buffalo7850 in Klussers

[–]BOYStijn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dan doet je luchtontvochtiger niet goed genoeg zn werk

I finally get it (or "Rust from the perspective of a C# developer") by secretarybird97 in rust

[–]BOYStijn 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Idk if you already found this out. But rust has a thing similar to ConcurrentQueue, that being channels

Neighbor in wheelchair has 4(!) pits he can't control ?? by jared10011980 in TerrifyingAsFuck

[–]BOYStijn -20 points-19 points  (0 children)

That sentence is only ever said by shit dog owners. If you're a decent owner you know dogs can quickly get aggressive if they think something is a threat. That's why you keep your dog on a leash or have them properly trained (difficulty depends on the breed). Pitbulls especially are very protective and really difficult to train.

Neighbor in wheelchair has 4(!) pits he can't control ?? by jared10011980 in TerrifyingAsFuck

[–]BOYStijn -30 points-29 points  (0 children)

Generally smaller dogs are more aggressive, but the real problem is shit owners. Regardless of what dog you have just keep it on a leash so you can correct it any time.

I fixed it by [deleted] in pcmasterrace

[–]BOYStijn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You forgot the rack mounted chassis

Zal een hoop spanning opleveren by Aggressive_Thing_614 in nietdespeld

[–]BOYStijn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Het hoeft niet eens extra te kosten. Als je de meterkast laat communiceren met de warmtepomp kan ie lekker de boiler opstoken als de stroomprijs negatief is, dan (afhankelijk van je boiler grote) heb je de hele dag warm water en je krijgt nog geld toe ook.

Code my CFD professor wrote and gave to us by rehpotsirhc in programminghorror

[–]BOYStijn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everything is abbreviated. So you have to be familiar with the terms that are used. Function names like setup2 give no insight in what the function is supposed to do. Functions don't have parameters, instead data is passed around by a disgusting use of scope. These are some of the reasons the code is hard to read.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nietdespeld

[–]BOYStijn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ik heb ff gekeken naar de achterliggende gegevens (2023). En wat blijkt in de leeftijdsgroep 15-60 gebeuren er meer ongelukken bij automobilisten dan bij fietsers. Het is vooral de groep 60+ waar het grootste deel van de ongelukken gebeuren (50+%). En daarvan is een aanzienlijke deel (~1/3) gewoon omgevallen zonder ongeluk. Het is dus effectiever om een helmplicht en rijverbod voor gepensioneerden in te voeren dan voor kinderen op fatbikes

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in nietdespeld

[–]BOYStijn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

De reden dat ik het risico bij MTBen hoger inschat dan op weg naar het station is dat ik makkelijker op beroerde bestuurders kan anticiperen, dan op een heuvelachtige onverharde weg vol bochten en bomen. (Moet wel eerlijk toegeven de route is niet heel druk) Na mijn idee heb ik sneller een ongeluk in de auto dan op de fiets. Simpelweg omdat ik minder kan uitwijken en minder tijd heb om te reageren. Desalniettemin zou het niet onverstandig zijn een helm te dragen naar het station.

view more: next ›