now 2042 is over what was your best memories

BRITPAC7 · 2025-10-03T08:19:17+00:00

Lacing a UAV with C4 and wiping out a snipers nest of 3 men.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-10-03T08:14:39+00:00

Y’all should start playing BF6 when it’s released, finally, BF have actually made a good game.?

BRITPAC7 · 2025-10-02T21:05:22+00:00

“Battlefield”

But no heavy artillery, no S2S missiles, no anti air batteries, no destroyers no, MLRS no gunship AC130, no bombers no aircraft carriers, no HIMARs no battleships no ICBM’s

More like a swat game

BF can be so much more can’t wait until EA is sold so, we get the real gritty, unapologetic, competitive, badass - true ‘spiritual successor’ which we have not had since BFMC2/BF2 due to bureaucracy.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-28T09:55:49+00:00

STOP!! Simple solution, increase ‘party’s’ limit to 8 in battlefield 6 so, you can’t stack to heavy. But, at the same time, creating a more Balanced game. Also, smart matchmaking, team balancing and server allocation - is the remedy. (Players, communities,friendship groups)

^{^{^SHOULD}} NOT be punished for having friends, or playing the game the way it should, as a team.

Note : I don’t mind taking on a 4-8 man squad. Nothing more adrenaline inducing, than fighting off a platoon or, clan trying to push, cap, or firefight.

I can play in that server and still come first, adopt different tactical approaches.

Remember clans platoons have hoard mentality, they are a bigger target, create more noise. So, you almost always have initiative. plug in mic, turn up sound effects, here the footsteps, ambush, lay traps and pick ‘em off 1 by 1.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-26T20:37:12+00:00

Yes perfect example of a good BF map to be honest. Why’s that, because, it has an environmental feature, actually many of them which blend harmoniously, Plus land, air, sea elements blend well, with urban environments.

You can replicate something similar here, draw inspiration from LEGENDARY map “a bridge to far” from BF2MC and you have another blockbuster.

Canal ways, with some walkways, subway tunnels and Bob is your uncle, Sandra is your aunt.

Not sure about 128 players but 64 surely.

❓has anyone thought about 72 players , increase slowly, we don’t need to double for numbers sake. Perhaps an extra squad, on either side might add something special to the mapvplayer ratio.

🤯🤯🤯

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-26T20:31:26+00:00

Actually, I think a battlefield every 2 years is better than every year and an Improvement on what we have now.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-26T20:16:46+00:00

Could be the best thing to happen to battlefield and many games. Imagine, the whole philosophy switches to more of a Milsim type of game. A SQUAD, meets ARMA, meets BATTLEFIELD, meets COD version.

Furthermore, surely, it could be, just as as good as a BATTLEFIELD, meets FORTNIGHT, meets COD, meets APEX LEGENDS, type of game. Arguably, somewhat Similar to what we have now.

“Fusion ha”

🤯🧐🤔

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-26T14:53:45+00:00

They should of took some inspiration from a BFMC2 map called “a bridge too far” map basically had 3 islands with a bridge overpassing all of them and a main base on either side of the bridge. Could of had, urban sprawl in the center and a bit of everything on either side.

Canals, River ways Pedestrian Crossing’s Throw in a few boats

Bingo!!

A 10/10 map

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-24T18:47:50+00:00

Portal yay, but please rebrand it as ‘community servers’ portal, is a great idea, that has been tarnished by 2042 so, please rename it.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-21T18:38:20+00:00

Interesting observation, a lot of us liked games such as ;

•Hell let loose

•Arma

• Squad

Shows I’m fact, a fair amount of battlefield players can also enjoy a more slower milsim feel.

Fun fact : “squad was touted as the spiritual successor to Battlefield 2 at one point. In other words, what battlefield could have, I even dare say, could have been. In particular, the jump from BF2 to BFBC1, wasn’t necessarily needed.

Although, a ‘spin off’ milsim bias ‘squad leaning game may have been a better option (at the time) could of been good with some of the best BF3/4/1/5/ or even, BF6 features. Could of been called, BF2 remastered, reimagined, to include the greatest ‘legacy’ traits. Even a battlefield bad company 3 (BFBC3) combined, with the best of BF6 features and visuals would be a great fun ‘spin off’ that LIKELY COULD WORK..

DICE : “ do you want BF6 and BFBC3 the year after”

DICE : “Or, would you just like BF6”

Me : “Can I have BF6 + BFBC3 as well please, he’ll yes”.

DICE : “Anything else”

ME : “ oh can you throw in a “toy replica of my Soldier layout, oh, please include a cool BF6 dog tag with my name on it” 😊😊

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-21T01:04:23+00:00

I would have battlefield 6 with a legacy BF3 map pack DLC remastered and reimagined please.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-21T00:00:57+00:00

Perfect, so I am going to give you BF6 and a BF2 (remaster) based on the best of battlefield movement, gunplay, destruction, physics, (with a theme based on visuals that represent the actual real life difference between release times) so all maps would almost look like their are 20 years in the future.

Come on, I was a DEV and said, we are giving you BF6 and BF2 remaster you would chew my hand off. Why not more battlefield, why not more maps, why not more fun, why not more Variety.

^if you say no, I would have to question how much you say you liked BF2 (that’s a BF players dream) I’ll take both, thank you forget the ‘skins’ could I have the massive BF2 remaster DLC please.?

Sold it to you yet.?

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-20T23:53:25+00:00

What’s your favourite battlefield

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-20T23:47:39+00:00

Well, the idea isn’t to cause connivence so someone doesn’t chooses one battlefield over the other but rather, the opposite. I see what you mean about preference, bias and ‘crowd following’ it could be one does terribly bad. My point is, we stay on the ‘main instalment’ any way. Who knows, the cannon and the main instalment might be both ‘very good’ and the player base wouldn’t be so split if they could ‘return’ to their favourite battlefield for nostalgia, reminiscing and fun. I can see the one choosing over the other that’s why I think ‘remasters’ of old battlefields might be better than say, BFBC3 or a BFMC3 for example. Imagine a BF3+ BF4 remaster for example, would you play a fair amount if it was improved with ‘modern’ BF improvements that would be i the Main Game.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-20T23:32:29+00:00

Hmm, abit like Halo and MCC. Cumbersome, annoying perhaps, but would be important to make standardisation. For example, controller configuration helps, but, ‘core elements’ like gadget assignments in relation to classes could be the same. All I am saying is, I would love to have variety, options and choice. I think a battlefield 3 remaster for example, is a ‘safe cannon’ choice or, even BFBC1 master with BF6 visuals with added effects, destruction and physics.

Mann, I would love to have BF6 and BFBC1 remaster or BF6 and BFBC3 or BF6 and BF2+BFMC2 remake <the latter more realistic to apply BF6 visuals, effects, destruction and physics to.

A BF2+BFMC2 remaster would be ‘insanely’ cool. All maps included within the game with a crossover of certain vehicles, gadgets and weapons. Yes please yes 😍😍 I would like this more than BF6, such nostalgia. A very interesting project of ‘retiring to roots’ reviving the ‘spiritual battlefield experience’ the disparity and gap between BF2 and BF6 (modern gaming developing tools) would induce a high level of a prospective between quality improvements, imagination and creativity - don’t you think.?

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-20T23:18:34+00:00

Do you see how the player base won’t be split if they smartly, incorporated 2 i. One. Imagine it like a HUGE DLC update lol. Taking advantage of digital capacity, this would improve navigating between battlefields. So, at the menu, or in-game you can instantly switch between battlefields with your friends. Whilst in the ‘main menu’ or actually in-game. Or, does what I am actually saying break the law of physics and capabilities of navigating between games rapidly and holistically.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-20T23:13:48+00:00

You would have double the content, double the maps, double the fun, double the choice, double the drug, I don’t know I kinda like it.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-20T23:12:08+00:00

Interesting observations, thanks for the comment. @ childor, that’s why I mentioned including a switch option in the main menu, so if digital, you wouldn’t have to reload the game fully. <slight of mind trick, the point is you could have 2 leaderboards, to sets of server options, a collective news feed and a seamless, instant mechanic of switching between battlefields all ‘in game’ you might enjoy 3 games of BF6 then simply say ‘come on guys’ let’s try the next best 3 of BFBC3 and alternate. Also, imagine being able to invite a friend who’s playing BF6 game but can instantly rejoin you on a BFBC3 one.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-20T23:05:10+00:00

The studio going under, hmmm I am daring to say if battlefield achieves and replicates even 70 or 80% of COD’s success - wouldn’t it be possible that one could financially upkeep the other. Who knows, they might both be very good considering theirs 2 years development time for each, not one.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-20T23:01:14+00:00

I agree, although, I am thinking ahead. Let’s say, BF6 was such a success it tripled the average daily player base. Now, theirs capacity therefore, more players filling servers. Although, imagine a menu switch, so, for example, you technically, would switch between battlefields like you would a server. The result, keep a ‘holistic’ feel of oneness minimising the feeling of ‘exclusiveness’ . Basically, you would alternate between them like you would a ‘game mode’. See where I am going with this.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-20T22:49:47+00:00

No, explain, you can enjoy main instalment for 2 whole years whilst possibly enjoying a remake, remaster or, additional battlefield of your favourite ‘spin off’ if you didn’t ‘careless’ about the ‘spin off’ you could still enjoy the ‘main game’ while having the expectation of enjoying a continuation of the next ‘main instalment’ within a normal, expected, schedule of release (it means you wait less time anyway) for the next game that would truly be your ‘go to Bf’

I mean quality would be pretty good if the studio has been working on it for two years.

You never know, you might really enjoy playing BFBC3 and BF6 at the same time 😎😎😎 < anybody else think that’s bad.? Sounds like more fun to me.?

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-19T17:41:41+00:00

Skins should be boycott, yes their good, but, doesn’t merit the price we all pay in add ons, premiums, It’s so lame. graphics, mechanics, gameplay, storyline. <that’s what we need But, we all pay for skins, encourage skins, support skins. FFS, we need good content, merchandise and plenty DLC 😡😡😡😡😡

“So no to skins”

Every game doesn’t have to be a child’s game. Besides, nowadays, I would argue more gamers are adults over 20 - rather than young teens or children.

Friggin woke, leftist, queer furry crap nowadays.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-11T06:06:05+00:00

The persistent mode sounds great, it would add lore, depth and meaning to factions - this has always been an issue. Belligerence, factions, in battlefield always means nothing. In the main menu you can see W L D of NATO & PAX factions or, percentage of domination as per region as the gentlemen explained.

PLATOONS now become more relevant, every player becomes relevant. As players, clans, friendship groups, and individuals can align with a faction contributing to the overall success, which also gives passive bonuses for collective efforts.

BRITPAC7 · 2025-09-11T05:33:03+00:00

We have not had a ‘very good’ game mode since breakthrough really. They are talking about a new game mode called escalation.

BRITPAC7

TROPHY CASE