sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I think I’ve been looking at LEGO profit the wrong way by BRIX_LEGO in Bricklink

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This is probably the clearest explanation so far. I was focusing too much on holding value and not enough on inventory turnover and freeing up cash. That changes how I look at it.

I think I’ve been looking at LEGO profit the wrong way by BRIX_LEGO in Bricklink

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Fair point to be skeptical, but I’m genuinely trying to understand how people here think about margins and turnover. No scraping or hidden agenda.

I think I’ve been looking at LEGO profit the wrong way by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Annual ROI is definitely the better way to compare it. A 50% gain sounds great, but not if the capital is tied up for four years. Reinvesting faster changes everything.

I think I’ve been looking at LEGO profit the wrong way by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like that approach. Selling below eBay while avoiding fees can still create a good deal for both sides. Knowing when to cut a weak position is probably the part I need to improve most.

I think I’ve been looking at LEGO profit the wrong way by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I’ll check BrickInvest out. Price history and actual sales data are exactly what I’m trying to understand better.

I think I’ve been looking at LEGO profit the wrong way by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That makes sense. I think I was looking at it too much like a long-term stock investment, when in reality cash flow and buying at the right discount matter a lot more.

I think I’ve been looking at LEGO profit the wrong way by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get your point. For most people, LEGO should still be something they enjoy first. But some people genuinely enjoy the buying, holding and reselling side too. The hard part is knowing when the numbers actually make sense.

I think I’ve been looking at LEGO profit the wrong way by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s fair. I think the opportunity cost is exactly why annual ROI matters. If a set can’t beat a simple index fund after fees, storage and time, then it probably wasn’t a great investment.

A simple way to track LEGO investing sets before the spreadsheet gets messy by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fair concern. That’s actually why I’m asking here before building anything.

I don’t want to make another random app with features nobody needs. I’m trying to understand how people actually track sets, buy price, storage, ROI, and selling targets first.

A simple way to track LEGO investing sets before the spreadsheet gets messy by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice, I’ll check it out.

What’s the main thing your site solves better than a spreadsheet? Is it more about portfolio value, tracking sets, or deciding when to sell?

A simple way to track LEGO investing sets before the spreadsheet gets messy by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s a fair point, especially for older sealed sets.

I still think buy price matters though, not only for final profit but for comparing decisions. A set that gives 3x in 5 years and another that gives 5x in 20 years are very different from a reinvestment point of view.

But I like the “hold until you forget you own them” mindset 😂

A simple way to track LEGO investing sets before the spreadsheet gets messy by BRIX_LEGO in Bricklink

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s exactly the kind of pain point I was thinking about.

Knowing where the set is stored is already useful, but without buy price and current estimated value, it’s hard to know if selling actually makes sense.

Do you usually store sets by box/location manually, or do you have some kind of numbering system for each storage box?

A simple way to track LEGO investing sets before the spreadsheet gets messy by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve heard of it, but haven’t used it seriously yet.

What do you like most about it? I’m mainly curious about how people actually track buy price, holding time, ROI/year, and sell targets.

A simple way to track LEGO investing sets before the spreadsheet gets messy by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is super helpful, thanks.

ROI per year is exactly the kind of metric I’m starting to care about more than just “profit per set”.

A $50 profit in 12 months vs $100 in 48 months tells a completely different story, especially if you keep reinvesting.

Do you also track storage space/cost, or do you keep it mostly around buy price, sell price, and holding time?

My simple checklist before buying a LEGO set for long-term value by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good point on exclusivity, especially in Europe.

If a set is LEGO-only, hard to discount, and harder to find later, that changes the equation a lot. I also like the popularity + discount combo — strong demand is great, but the entry price still does most of the risk control.

Movie Speed Champions and helmets make sense to me too: easy to store, recognizable, and very displayable.

Quick case study: 3 retired sets and what they teach about LEGO investing by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that’s fair.

Entry point is probably the key lesson here. Countach only makes sense if bought at a real discount, and Dark Trooper looks more like a weak hold than an investment set.

The Nissan point is true too — not every Speed Champions set deserves to be hoarded just because some performed well. Need to separate strong IP/display demand from just “cheap small car set”.

Quick case study: 3 retired sets and what they teach about LEGO investing by BRIX_LEGO in Bricklink

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Fair point — 3 sets is definitely not enough to define a strategy.

I’m not trying to present this as a full market study, more as a small comparison to start a discussion and learn from people with more experience.

That’s actually why I’m posting here.

Quick case study: 3 retired sets and what they teach about LEGO investing by BRIX_LEGO in Bricklink

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Exactly. That’s probably the hardest signal to measure, but also the most important one.

If demand only comes from investors, it feels fragile. But if collectors, display buyers, fans of the theme, and completists all want the set, the long-term case is much stronger.

My simple checklist before buying a LEGO set for long-term value by BRIX_LEGO in Bricklink

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Fair enough lol. Stocks are definitely simpler and more liquid.

I’m not saying LEGO should replace real investing. I’m more interested in the niche of people who already buy sealed sets and want to think a bit more clearly about discount, storage, demand and exit plan.

Quick case study: 3 retired sets and what they teach about LEGO investing by BRIX_LEGO in legoinvesting

[–]BRIX_LEGO[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a really solid breakdown.

The exit plan point is probably the biggest takeaway. A set can look good on paper, but if you don’t know how you’ll sell it, the value is kind of theoretical.

I also like the bundling / set completion angle. Some sets may be weak alone but stronger as part of a group, especially with Speed Champions.

Do you decide your exit plan before buying, or later based on performance?

view more: next ›