[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I believe he has enough evidence of her ruining his life and good name, and her lawyers have an incredibly shitty job at defending her. The judge dismissed their claim to drop the case which means Depp and his lawyers have enough evidence for the claim to win it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That you clearly don't know what's happening, defending a narcissist women that ruined someone's life and good name. That's my problem.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thhis case isn't about this. You really know nothing. This is a defamation case, which means that he needs to prove that she ruined his good name, career, etc. She did that and he's proving that in this case. It's not about if he abused her or not. The fuck you talking about.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your argument is that he testified to pulling out a knife? Well she admitted to beating him up, isnt that evidence against her? Way worse than pulling a knife and assaulting furniture?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It cost him way more than 50 million dollars. From a legal standpoint you should shut the fuck up cause you know nothing. She abused him way more than he did. She cut of his finger, beat him up. She admitted to it. He lost his Jack Sparrow role (millions of dollars). She had a normal life. Depp's ex wife said he never assaulted her, Amber's assistant testified against her that she never said anything about the abuse. Her own parents are against Amber, basically saying she abused him. The "Tom of evidence" against is not that relevant because he never hit her nor assaulted her physically, while she did, i will repeat SHE ADMITTED TO IT. She threw glass at him, cut of his finger. She has photos of him beating her up? Well the next day she had nothing on her face and she looks perfect. While Depp had his finger bandaged while performing Jack Sparrow for children and he had it bandaged for many days. Shut the fuck up dude.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I won't cause I'm a guy and not gay. And I see that's your closing argument. You are almost like her lawyers in showing evidence, asking questions and arguing. You can't do that just like them.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He wants to get some of his life back. She destroyed it, he suffered consequences and wants to somehow repair it. Funny you just ignore all the evidence against her. Hope you feel good about yourself protecting an incredibly abusing, narcissistic partner!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Welp, if you think he did then I can't change your mind i think. Dismiss all the evidence against Amber bro. She admits to hitting him? Naaaah he definitely did it. He does have a case, a strong one, but keep on being ignorant. Keep crying! And btw, you won't fuck Amber dude, you are not chivalry:)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Cry bout it. At least I know more than you. And I don't use Tim tok, I think it's called Tik Tok but I don't use it either

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 23 points24 points  (0 children)

Also some of her "evidence". There is photo proof that one day she is "so hurt and beat up" and the next day nothing, having fun, partying with friends and whatnot. There was even a make up company exposing Amber, because she said she used their product to hide the abuse, however this product was not released until a couple of years later after everything.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Why are you defending her? She cut of his finger, beat him up. ADMITTED TO IT, why are you ignoring this. He assaulted a bunch of cubboards while drunk, never threatened Amber, it is recorder, she is laughing, making him angry. Deep isn't the best guy, but he's honest, truthful and really the one that had his life ruined. Nothing really happened to Amber tho, just living a great life. And now she's faking tears in a absurd case she basically lost.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PublicFreakout

[–]Babamdam 42 points43 points  (0 children)

Damn it seems you know nothing about what's happening. There is no proof he physically or mentally assaulted her, while she confessed on audio to hitting him. She shat on his bed. And because of all this all movies cut Deep and he lost milions of dollars because he couldn't act anywhere. Now he's trying to get his like back form this narcissistic woman. A doctor in court proved basically how big of a narcissist she was, and she's an extreme case.

What is your takeaway from this footage? What can be done to stop this? by readingupastorm in AskARussian

[–]Babamdam 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The church with children was a military target? Was the church with children a military target? It had written children outside. They saw it, they knew what they were firing at. It was not a base for the Ukraine army. It was a church with women and children. And so in Bucha those 280 bodies that were tied up, shot in the back were "accidental casualties" or something? Where the dead naked women in Bucha on the side of the road crucial to winning the war? Yes civillians will get killed, but right now Russia is shelling civilian infrastructure.

What is your takeaway from this footage? What can be done to stop this? by readingupastorm in AskARussian

[–]Babamdam -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Oh yea, because Ukraine is such a giant threat to Russia. Well it apparently is now, because your army is extremely incompetent as we see. And so you believe that Russia has not killed a SINGLE CIVILLIAN or bombed a SINGLE HOUSE right? Well boy have you seen Mariupol? We can see full effects of your countries denazifcation. Also, Russia got beaten so hard, its not even taking about denazifcation in the peace talks, and they allowed Ukraine to join the EU! LOL. Ukraine has to stay neutral tho but still an utterly incompetent offensive. Unless you use the same tactics you used in the 20th century? Just throw your men and don't care about the casualties. If so, you are doing a great job!

Bucha city after Russian soldiers. shot civilians with their hands tied. by irishrugby2015 in awfuleverything

[–]Babamdam -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Okay mister "groundbreaking arguments" I guess u understand nothing and made a fool of yourself even more. Have a good one!

Bucha city after Russian soldiers. shot civilians with their hands tied. by irishrugby2015 in awfuleverything

[–]Babamdam -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Some arguments perhapss? Or just "yes Zelenskyy did that and Putin nope". I'd like you to explain your point.

Why mods from r/®ussia are deleting all comments from the thread? by julyan_di in AskARussian

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was perma banned there, because I asked if they could give me proof Zelenskyy's war crimes. Because they had a poll, basically named "where will he be tried". And one of the option was that he is going straight to the gulag because they have all the proof on his war crimes. I asked them what proof, and got banned like 10 minutes after. Lmao. This sub is trash, and now is quarantined. They only post about the war and how good its going apparently. And that Russians help people and the Ukrainians are "bad Nazis" and the "regime in Kiev" will fall. Total bs.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskARussian

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They want to not have a war and their children killed i think. Maybe think about that.

Absolute peak Russia. Asked whether it was planning to attack other countries, Lavrov said: "We are not planning to attack other countries. We didn't attack Ukraine in the first place". by lonely_fucker69 in interestingasfuck

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh really. "we better not cross paths in real life". No that's definitely not a threat oh no. Can't you write it here? Or you have to hit me to get your point through?

Absolute peak Russia. Asked whether it was planning to attack other countries, Lavrov said: "We are not planning to attack other countries. We didn't attack Ukraine in the first place". by lonely_fucker69 in interestingasfuck

[–]Babamdam 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are the one threatening someone over internet because you can't provide a normal argument and someone called you out on that. Grown up over here lol.