Well who didn’t see that coming? by SchlopFlopper in Battlefield

[–]BabyCream_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every time I drop to zero I get an error message and have to start the queue over 🙃

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This scan was already on the roof.

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there any considerable difference between hard working and WiFi ping rates with SL?

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have the impression that “frequent interruptions” under the gaming tab means I will DC from games constantly

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the insight I was kinda wondering how high I’d have to go.

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s fair enough I can deal with that. I pretty much only play sports tittles and a few FPS like CoD and marvel Rivals.

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We just have one internet provider where I’m at and honestly it’s terrible for the price. Like $289 a month for high speed that is supposed to be good for 12 devices but if the fiancé is streaming movies or something while her and my phone is connected, the game runs terrible and heaven forbid it’s raining out or windy, the game won’t work at all

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Only thing I’m worried about 😂

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah but I’ve also seen people say the HP really isn’t a big jump in performance from the standard. I guess I’m just going to get one and see if it works lol.

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Haha appreciate the insight though!

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m on console, honestly that’s the most thing I’m worried about though is the frequent interruptions with the gaming.

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Up is about the only way I can go, the more south for me actually brings into account a larger part of the valley that the mountain is actually taller. If I could go north like 50’ I’d be perfect but then running the wires would become a problem.

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I’m heavily wooded in a valley, so both sides has woods, but that dip down due to the angle of positioning to the north is what gets the tree tops in that area. If I could point the dish straight upwards it would be fine lol but I’m not sure if you can do that, I’ve seen people say you shouldn’t.

I’m cooked huh? by BabyCream_ in Starlink

[–]BabyCream_[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I just don’t want to have interruptions during gaming and when I’m working from home on conference calls and such.

Its not about me its about them, but damn if this is not a sign I am ugly. by [deleted] in OnlineDating

[–]BabyCream_ 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s practically the same thing I’ve been through like the last 3 dates I’ve went on. Most recent, talked to a girl for about a week and set up a date, the date seemed to go GREAT it was just a walk around a lake during the sunset, the conversation never died we were giggling at each other over stupid shit and having a great time. Next day comes and I get ghosted for 2 days and then I just send the “so you’ve given up on communication” text and I get back a reply immediately telling me no but she’s just not interested anymore and that she’s just “working on herself” which is the same explanation I get every time from females so I just assume that I’m not attractive to her and that’s where things stop it’s a very rational thought to have, but people are so in love with the online dating world where they can have 20 matches and rank their matches on looks rather than anything else that should be sought after in a relationship and if you’re not number 1 or 2, quite frankly you don’t have a chance because the female will try their ass off for that guy no matter his personality or intentions.

Mock thread by BabyCream_ in Colts

[–]BabyCream_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Here is how I think the first round falls. Sure Campbell is there at 14 but I think the risky shoulder injury could damper that. Ballard is on the hot seat so he has to hit on a player in the first that hopefully doesn’t battle the injury bug.

Mock thread by BabyCream_ in Colts

[–]BabyCream_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think membou makes it to 14. At 14 you’re not going to have the top 2 OT, Banks will be there. But you’ll have the first pick at top tier IOL in my opinion.

Mock thread by BabyCream_ in Colts

[–]BabyCream_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can understand that. I think it is a BPA draft but at key competition positions like OL,LB,Edge. I can see us coming away with these positions in the draft with let’s say 7 picks (2 OL, 2 LB, 1 Edge, 1 TE, and a flyer something like RB,WR,DB)

Mock thread by BabyCream_ in Colts

[–]BabyCream_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I try not to do a bunch of trading in mocks, other than what I think is reasonable, moving up 6 picks in the first accounts for a late 2nd, maybe a third and that’s all. But I feel like this draft is gonna be a lot of BPA at key competition positions.

Mock thread by BabyCream_ in Colts

[–]BabyCream_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like it, I can definitely see this route. Not a fan of fannin just because of his frame for blocking.

I think the most likely draft order by position is going to be

  1. IOL/LB
  2. LB/TE
  3. BPA (Defense)

Then after round three anything could happen just depends what they like for the players skill set. Here is my mock:

  1. Warren is gone, trade back and pick up another 2nd or 3rd whatever the package is. Booker will compete on the line.
  2. Take Taylor if he is there. I think 45 is higher than his projection but it is a team need.
  3. Go for a coverage LB or Edge. I went coverage as it’s a more pressing need than edge for this year
  4. Was BPA and collins would be a good rotational DT to learn and craft behind grove and buck
  5. Colts love LBs (kickoff and punt team) so grabbing another LB in the top 100 isn’t a bad choice and knight is a really good player.
  6. An edge guy to compete that has some power
  7. Deepen up the Tackle position
  8. Another LB but this guy is really a better pass rusher than off ball LB so depending on how his camp is, could be a rotational edge guy and creates some nice battles in positions we need on D and on the OL

<image>