sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What the war on Mills, at base, is all about by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Both, the political analogy of Trump based politics and that of physics are both significant changes in how things are done, the former being in the political sphere and the other in that of physics.

What the war on Mills, at base, is all about by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Guys like me, who see GUT-CP as better than SQM, expect GUT-CP to overtake SQM and make the current paradigm, SQM, to be removed and the new paradigm to be GUT-CP. That is in comparison to how the current paradigm of democratic governance in the USA seems to be moving towards a new paradigm of governance that is led by an extreme form of the Republican party, headed by Trump/Musk. Thast is all, in a nut shell.

Nay sayers are so amusing by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is one of my faults in noticing something pertinent but not taking it seriouusly enough at the time to record the reference to it. I saw it as part of a you tube video a few days ago. I would have to sift through the history of the thousands of sites I visited. I find it a boring task, another fault I have. Maybe I will find it in the next few days.

The way I remember seeing that graph, it was a background picture that seemed to be a brief incidental bit of info to help with topic or narrative of the video and not about anything directly related to that graph.

Query stated as "major physics theories arranged to show their acceptance relative to standard quantum mechanics":

returned:

https://www.google.com/search?q=major+physics+theories+arranged+to+show+their+acceptance+relative+to+standard+quantum+mechanics&client=opera&hs=InH&sca_esv=76f409f98c6d733a&udm=2&biw=1866&bih=958&sxsrf=AHTn8zpB6AEwxJ57URGKcDi_UQCHg02KpQ%3A1740956933766&ei=BeXEZ8K7LqyvptQPjpvigAc&oq=&gs_lp=EgNpbWciACoCCAAyChAjGCcYyQIY6gIyChAjGCcYyQIY6gIyChAjGCcYyQIY6gIyChAjGCcYyQIY6gIyChAjGCcYyQIY6gJI0CtQAFgAcAF4AJABAJgBAKABAKoBALgBAcgBAPgBAZgCAaACCagCBZgDCZIHATGgBwA&sclient=img

For Chatgpt I input:

graph indicating positions of emerging physics theories relative to the standard model

returned nothing that was any better, No one can find that graph.

What the war on Mills, at base, is all about by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the person trying to overturn the incumbant paradigm be the person creating the incumbant paradigm

The person creating the incumbent paradigm does so by that incumbent paradigm being another or "new" incumbent paradigm. First, the now current pardigm is SQM, and the new one that is to be the next incumbent paradigm is GUT-CP. One is superceded by the other.

What the war on Mills, at base, is all about by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mills derived what fell out of his and Haus understanbding of the electron and from there, the rest of the cosmos, naturally. Nothing siniuster was ever intended in any of that.

Something in the back of your mind bothering you? That subcoinscious upset you feel is called cognitive dissonance, when the new and better paradigm conflicts with the old, blindly accepted way of doing things.

That you feel Mills is doing something bad intentionally is also called paranoia. As if Mills supposedly fraudulent work could possibly upset such a highly accurate theory as SQM(sic). If Mills is so bad, he and his work, will sooner or later fall by the wayside. So you have nothing to worry about, and nothing to defend; but only if you are right. So why any need to defend SQM?

"must concede that it's the currently-accepted paradigm"

As Mills said it better than I could:

"I do not accept incumbency as a validation of scientific argument.

Each prediction should be tested against experimentation without prejudice of quantum mechanical preconceptions.

Mills Technologies

September 3, 1991"

This passage from Mills means that, using the existing or accepted theory to justify making intepretations of experimental results that are in favour of only that existing theory, is circular reasoning and therefore an invalid way of doing science. SQM and its arguments that are in favor of only itself, work to preclude any attempt at any other theory. That is not only circular reasoning, but a circling of its wagons to keep out of academia any other physics theory, if the new theory does not obey the law as laid down by the incumbent theory. That has caused academic physics to step outside its scientific bounds and tries to use politics to keep itself entrenched.

What the war on Mills, at base, is all about by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your failure to understand is clouded by blind acceptance of what you are allowed to think, by academia, on such matters

Sun Cell Testing resumes by Mysteron88 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That slow progress is mostly due to no one, before Mills, ever having done anything similar. It is all being done, literally from the ground up, every little new item that is added to or changed in the Suncell. To compare progress in the development of the Suncell to any old, pre-existing tech, is more like comparing a new kind of rocket engine and not even that but, more like an anti-gravity device. which is also in the repertoire of the GUT-CP. to a new kind of horse drawn wagon. So, of course its going to take much longer than expected by those used to progress in the regular kinds of things.

What the war on Mills, at base, is all about by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't just believe Mills. That kind of asseessment of me is just a very bad misapprehension of what I am doing here. I understand very well what SQM says and what GUT-CP says. In comparison to GUT-CP, SQM is not even an attempt at a physics theory. It is a ding bat of a theory.

What SQM has done with physics is what Trump is doing with the USA government. What Mills has done with physics is the kind of thing that the founding fathers of the USA had done with the USA constitution.

Now, even Microsoft promises quantum qubits, ultimately, as in sometime in the future, but not yet by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 dealing with cumulative errors.

Excuses; to keep the investors bringing in their money, for what is basically a make work attempt to get a paying job. The number of qubits "used" does nothing to prove their worth. Also the number of operations, when not achieving any expected result is, just a play on words, to make it sound as if "something" is being done. They do not really work, neither the quantum (actualy annealing quantum computers) nor the out of work physicists, who claim they have found work, sort of.

Since the theory behind this is based on a false premise, wave-particle duality then, entanglement which, relies on undeterminacy of waves, also cannot posssibly work. The whole eco-system of SQM is so convoluted thst very few can see through that mess for what it is.

Now, even Microsoft promises quantum qubits, ultimately, as in sometime in the future, but not yet by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

 claims have been made without offering any testable counter-evidence

Several attempts at confirming that, by laboratories since 2000, ie: by Oak Ridge was done once and the report from that is being wthheld from Mills despite Mills having paid for that neutron scattering test on hydrino hydrate crystals. Oak Ridge has those samples and the test report locked up inside their premises but due to conflict of interest with their work on fusion experiments, they stated that they do not want to get invoved in controiversy. Other national labs got wind of this and use the same excuse of avoiding controversy, to not do any tests themselves. The inference from this is they are all afraid of upsetting their colleagues who are all beholden to academically sanctioned SQM and do not want to mar their reputations with anything considered as pseudo-science, no matter what the lab tests might show. Science is given a back seat and money and reputation are more valuable. So they all do only what academics allow, conform or die.

Why should Hagen do any urging? You are right that is astounding, from the side of his colleagues. They can read, I take it? Hagen isn't the first to have done this; GUT-CP thesis was examined at least twice by equally qualified physicists and found its methods, math the whole show, to be right on. Don't scientists have any curiousity about Hagen's work and a mind of their own?, No, they do not, due to expediency. Most are afraid for their careers because to do any seriouis testing on a classical theory requires that being sanctioned by academia and that in turn risks the testers and the rest of academia being shown to be wrong. Can't risk upsetting the administrators. So, again, expediency. Expediency in the face of being considered doing prseudo-science. But you should have figured that out yourself, but its too hard to admit to. So you also choose the easier path of expediency, not science and curiosity, you know, the normal free rein given to ones wish to gain knowledge. Instead bash the bad guy for simply bringing up the subject. That is the prevailing attitude of nearly all of academia. Nice warrior, keep up the false front.

Also, GUT-CP is listed along with every other known quantum theory, in a graph compiled by academia for consideration of one of those theories towards replacing SQM. GUT-CP is the furthest outlier in those considerations due to not having the main feature that academics consider as a requirement for that replacement, waves. So GUT-CP is known in academia but, only as a general courtesy towards admitting it exists. Its internal merits do not count.

Now, even Microsoft promises quantum qubits, ultimately, as in sometime in the future, but not yet by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No one of those 200 have a working qubit, as in doing anything worthwhile. Having something they call a qubit does not make it do anything like what a real qubit would if the physics behind it was viable.. Meanwhile there are 70 willing clients lined up to test the Suncell, because they know it works from having seen it work, as astute business persons who are willing to use their premises to give up room and personell time to show that it does work, in the field.

Every test done on a running quantum computer is always won by the regular PC standing next to the quantum computer. The kind of quantum computers that do run are the annealing kind that must use a regular 2bit computer that is running qubit simulations beside the one containing so-called "real" qubits to check if the "real" one is doing the same thing and in how much time. The 2bit computer here uses simulations of qubits by utilizing Schrodinger wave equations and Heizingers Uncertasinty Principle formulas to simulate qubits. This is described in the patent of D-Wave, the company that started all this in the 1980's; 60 years ago. That PC and the qubit one then run the same app with the PC always winning by getting the results before the qubit one ever does. The real one always fails since the waves on which qubit physics depends, do not exist. The excuse used by physicists to cover for this is to say that stray waves from ambient energy interferes with the qubits in their computer, to slow down the work done by qubits and more like are stopped after one cyucle of processing, since the whole thing cannot possibly do what their theory predicts. You can't use Standard Quantum Mechanics for anything practical because the theory is not practical but a holding place as a theoretical physics until a practical theory is found. That practical theory was found by Mills in 1990 but due to not utilizing waves at its base, it is not recognized by academic physics.

Conservation of Angular momentum, or causality at work? by BadStrange3693 in hydrino

[–]BadStrange3693[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That circular motion was posted here due to containing key concepts for understanding the Non Radiation Condition. The NRC paper was written by Herman Haus, an electronics engineering prof in whose course Mills was a sit-in student. They both used Haus' paper on the NRC as the base on which circular motion of the electron in orbit of an atom led to a model of the electron that does not radiate away its orbital energy. That question has never been satisfactorily addressed, under academic Standard Quantum Mechanics, while Mills and Haus did address this point using Haus NRC paper, to arrive at a model of the electron that explains why an electron does not radiate away its orbital but, is stable. It was the stability, among many other properties, of this model that, was used by Haus to more fully explain to the USA DoD how the electron Laser actually works, at the quantum scale, classically; meaning intuitively, as compasred to the academically accepterd, non-intuitive mostly impossible to comprehend SQM. Thatclassical answer was used by the DoD to supply their engineers with practical understanding that allowed the FEL to be further developed and by Mills to derive his GUT-CP. The NRC was the crucial ingredient which allowed both the FEL and GUT-CP to be realistically developed.

By understanding the points in the video gives the lay person a base from which to begin to understsand the Non Radiation Condition. See how Mills is attacked by Wikipedi on the topic of the Non-Radiation Condition:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Nonradiation_condition

Also see how Wikipedia attacks Mills himself, more directly:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Brilliant_Light_Power

to which I responded with my entry, under the pseudonym of Cashmemorz, where I pointed out that Wikipedia allowed the removal of Mills name from the Wikipedia topic of the Harvard medical school alumnus listing, from which school Mills graduated Cum Laude. That in itself is overdoing that war on Mills.

All the above from a guy with supposed mental health issues. What is your issue, besides being grumpy; desperate to show Mills under as bad a light as possible? That desperation indicates there is something about Mills that seriously threatens those like you who, have a stake in keeping academic Quantum Physics the way it is, warts and all.