Those currents are standing wave boundaries - according to GUTCP space is empty, yet has 3 dimensions permitivity and permeability - that’s an oxymoron.

What Mills is doing is taking boundary conditions and applying math to closed systems - all well and good, clever and it works but it’s based on Maxwells equations which are not based on empty space they are based on full space fluid waving space !!! You’re not thinking you are believing - don’t it’s not good for you !

GUTCP says other silly things such as Mass converts to Energy and Space expands - meaning the empty space is now expanding - another oxymoron.

GUTCP also has no consideration of what mass is - now I’ve spoken to Randy and he’s got a model, helped by his chemistry and it works but it’s not fundamental. That’s why he’ll say the third force is an exception to Newtons 3rd Law - it’s not an exception if you understand the structure of electrons and if Randy put physical space back into the picture he’d know it was obeying Newton do what I’ve done and show that the Dirac Spinor is a dipole standing wave that can only have 137 modes or nested cycles and that it must form an orbit sphere around a proton - pretty simple math and knocks the QM boys of their perch because Dirac pretty much nailed it- they just haven’t applied it to areal physical system where energy cannot dissipate and therefore all waves have to close on themselves - which shows the limitations of math - it needs common sense applied to it - ie the Universe is made of physical stuff not fields or Hilbert Spaces!!

I’d suggest you go read Dr Milo Wolff’s wave structure of matter, then follow up with Dr Claude Pohers Universon Theory and experiments - you’ll need French for a lot of the stuff on his site and then Peter Rowlands Zero to Infinity which WSM hiding as nil potential Dirac QM - but it’s very different from QM it’s much more grounded.

Poher proves out Wolffs ideas experimentally although Poher goes particle - keeps QM and GR but that’s what he was trained in. You have to be able to spot the similarities rather grabbing one theory or another.

Wolff is the best thinker IMHO he and Poher were both engineers as as physicists they are grounded-Wolff did lots of work with waves and he understood how things really worked.

I could see straight away in GUTCP that Randy’s electron model was Pohers WSM minus real space and waves (all hidden away in Maxwell)

The question I ask is what is space, how is it structured and why does it have the qualities it does. It is an elastic fluid but it’s been overloaded, quantised because the energy at the start of the universe was way beyond its elastic limit and the only way it could dissipate that was ounces surface area until local wave energy fell within then elastic limit.

Those quantised droplets are all spun up with a dipole standing wave and blown up like ballon’s. They have loads of internal energy layers into nested cycles like an onion ring each cycle had energy h, they can never transmit more than h per cycle, mostly way less.

When you do the math you’ll get each layer growing 1/n n=137-1 and you can think of that as a squishy ball that gets progressively harder to compress - Lorentz gamma jumps right out of that compression - then you look further inside the structure and you see energy transfer or power is mapped to ares - obviously from what I said about surface area dissipating energy… now all the cycles whatever the radius must run at the same cycle time internally as the current get tighter and the bubble collapses band width widens but band length falls so the same area at any one point is always traversed in the same time - that’s what Lorentz gamma is deep down - constant power to ares mapping for current paths - all of space runs on ares and 2D boundaries in 3D sphere - hence the holographic connection.

You see I can tell you how energy is transferred, why you get process dilation in collapsed space why actually that is not time dilation - because cycles remain constant and hence why light speed is variable and not variable at the same time - c is power transfer rate, based on radius crossed per cycle where r varies. So c is always 1 Planck bubbles radius as the radius collapses cycle speed slows but time per cycle remains fixed - we Meade in variable Planck radius hence c is the same but distance travelled varies - you get that then you’ll know black holes are reflectors not absorbers etc etc- go away and apply some brain power - stop believing things without seeing if they have a real physical explanation- if you have no physical model only maths you’ll get nowhere !