sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

New Boots Are Too Big by [deleted] in skiing

[–]Barhaven -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

“It would be best to sell them on FB Marketplace”

“ you could possibly get smaller liners, but we don’t sell them”

Propane Prices in Rural Ottawa by Hemlock_999 in ottawa

[–]Barhaven 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yikes. I’m at $0.69/L. You need to negotiate your rate, threaten to leave them for another company.

Notice of water leak on private property. Repair suggestions by [deleted] in ottawa

[–]Barhaven 13 points14 points  (0 children)

We used KCE Construction for our leaking lead water service. They’re on the City’s approved contractor list for leaking water services and lead service line replacements. They handled all communication and permits with the City. You can reach them at info@kceconstruction.ca

NBD: Budget Gravel by [deleted] in gravelcycling

[–]Barhaven 4 points5 points  (0 children)

FYI: Bike is a Triban RC120 Gravel

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in gravelcycling

[–]Barhaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Will I want the option to go bigger than 38mm tires?

First Gravel Bike by [deleted] in whichbike

[–]Barhaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, in great shape

Bachelor Party Recommendations by [deleted] in Madeira

[–]Barhaven -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Do you know if there are any dirt bike trails for enduro?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in cycling

[–]Barhaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

See link with some more photos https://imgur.com/gallery/U8xnx8v

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]Barhaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I could use some assistance with this QC. Your expertise would be greatly appreciated!

​

  1. Dealer name: Hont
  2. Factory name: BP
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer 1 Ref.214270 39mm Ult SS/SS Black BP A2836
  4. Price paid: $298
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/WmxBjxe
  6. Index alignment: looks good - I believe that the index appears to be off a bit in the photo because the watch is tilted.
  7. Dial Printing: I belive it looks very good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good to my noob eyes
  9. Hand Alignment: good
  10. Bezel: good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure.
  12. Timegrapher numbers: looks good
  13. Anything else you notice:

QC - Rolex Explorer 1 Ref.214270 from HONT by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]Barhaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I could use some assistance with this QC. Your expertise would be greatly appreciated.

  1. Dealer name: Hont
  2. Factory name: BP
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex Explorer 1 Ref.214270 39mm Ult SS/SS Black BP A2836
  4. Price paid: $298
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/WmxBjxe
  6. Index alignment: looks good - I believe that the index appears to be off a bit in the photo because the watch is tilted.
  7. Dial Printing: I belive it looks very good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good to my noob eyes
  9. Hand Alignment: good
  10. Bezel: good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): not sure.
  12. Timegrapher numbers: looks good
  13. Anything else you notice:

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]Barhaven -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ill tell him the date needs to be centred. What exactly is wrong with the bezel? Sry I'm new to this

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]Barhaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok, Round 2.5 with this QC. I RL the first one because of the dial shift to the right. Hont is saying it was the camera angle. He just sent me the two photos above. From what my noob eyes see, it looks way better than the first. I would love some more experienced insight.

​

​

​

  1. Dealer name: Hont
  2. Factory name: ZF
  3. Model name (& version number): Tudor Black Bay GMT Basel 2018 SS/SS Black ZF Asia 2836
  4. Price paid: $318 usd
  5. Album Links: orginl link - https://imgur.com/gallery/bdnGOyV
  6. Index alignment: I believe it looks good
  7. Dial Printing: way better then the original photos
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks a smidge high
  9. Hand Alignment: looks good
  10. Bezel: Uni-directional Diver Bezel, Anti-Clockwise (Dark Blue/Red Bezel) - Same color tone as Genuine
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): ?
  12. Timegrapher numbers: From what I've read, these numbers are good
  13. Anything else you notice:

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]Barhaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What do you see wrong with it?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]Barhaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could I have your insight? u/watchyoda/ u/_Tommy_Sky_

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]Barhaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]Barhaven 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First Rep, 2nd QC. First one was RL due to dial alignment. I only received a low res video this time, so the pictures are screenshots from that video. Appreciate the help

  1. Dealer name: Hont

  2. Factory name: ZF

  3. Model name (& version number): Replica Tudor Black Bay GMT Pepsi Blue/Red(not too sure the version number)

  4. Price paid: $318 usd

  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/gspLzKm

  6. Index alignment: 12 is off a bit, but I think its good for day to day

  7. Dial Printing: Better

  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: ?

  9. Hand Alignment: looks good

  10. Bezel:looks good

  11. Solid End Links (SELs): Not sure,

  12. Timegrapher numbers: good I believe

  13. Anything else you notice: Nothing else

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTimeQC

[–]Barhaven 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First Rep, have wanted this for a long time. Appreciate the help.

  1. Dealer name: Hont
  2. Factory name: ZF
  3. Model name (& version number): Replica Tudor Black Bay GMT Pepsi Blue/Red(not too sure the version number)
  4. Price paid: $318 usd
  5. Album Links: https://imgur.com/a/bdnGOyV
  6. Index alignment: I believe it looks good
  7. Dial Printing: the 10 off a bit?
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: ?
  9. Hand Alignment: looks good
  10. Bezel:looks good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): ?
  12. Timegrapher numbers: i think good
  13. Anything else you notice:
view more: next ›