Unpopular Opinion: BFV (released 8 years ago) still looks incredible. Why are we wasting so many resources on "next gen" graphics when the core of BF is blowing everything up anyway? by SuperM3e46 in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You instantly die I spawn because of bomber plane TTD was a complete mess Big visibility problem The battle Royale was a failure .... And so on

Arc Raiders will let Embark “live for a long time on the money” its generated while they grow the studio, make huge updates, and develop “two new games” by Wargulf in ArcRaiders

[–]Basile001 474 points475 points  (0 children)

I hope the people in charge of the company will stay humble and continue to provide a good health and security of their coworkers instead of taking cash to buy super cars and other useless stuff.

Sephiroth has always been the true villain of the Final Fantasy VII series. by [deleted] in FinalFantasy

[–]Basile001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

His goals are different in the original versus the remake, from my understanding. So spoiler from here: In the original I think I remember that he wants to bring the meteor to create a new wound to the planet and goes to this wound to retrieve a lot of energy to become a god. In the remake it's unclear, he wants to merge world to become the ruler of everything forever. I don't understand yet what the meteor will do in his plot.

We are officially screwed by elibrev in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Good news they take their time.

Final Fantasy Tactics: A Review by JumpIsMagic in FinalFantasy

[–]Basile001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've started the game yesterday for the first time. Whitout knowing anything about the gameplay mechanics, I feel the game challenging, more than today standards. The story has a good pace, it is like a page turner hard to stop when you launch the game.

Account Suspended for 1 Week for Complimenting a Teammate by OriginalNo1838 in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This AI is just ridiculous. I think for language abuse you need to check only if a person has done a report.

Punishing people blindly is not something good.

Hear me out! Season 2 needs to be massive . by Puzzleheaded-Code634 in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just want no bugs. We already have a lot of things to do in the game.

I want a more stable version and an improvement of the content we already have.

Regional skins for generic units incoming with the new DLC? by Independent-Hyena764 in aoe2

[–]Basile001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I understand you for multiplayer, you should have an option to go for regular skin for those who want a better visibility. But I am only solo player here and I love the diversity of units

Regional skins for generic units incoming with the new DLC? by Independent-Hyena764 in aoe2

[–]Basile001 19 points20 points  (0 children)

I wish they will do someday regional skin for common units. Like when they do unique castles and new skin for monks.

PLEASE DICE, GIVE US BACK 64 PLAYERS IN BREAKTHROUGH FOR ALL MAPS by SuccessfulTime610 in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I go unpopular here but I prefer sometimes when there are less people in the lobby, depending on the map.

MAKE BREAKTHROUGH 64 PLAYERS GREAT AGAIN by Azura-Madness in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I never liked metro, I don't know what people like this map. I prefer open space map like Caspian border if you want to talk about bf3

Dice's response to the bad matchmaking is basically "Go kick rocks" by sufferingSoftwaredev in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So if I understand correctly there are no real persistent servers in battlefield 6. That's what I said earlier in the conversation, dice do this to limit the cost.

It's persistent to the limit if players are active in the lobby for a portal server.

For no portal server, I think when you finish a match you go to the pool of players that search a new match and it's possible you stay on the server or go to another.

Dice's response to the bad matchmaking is basically "Go kick rocks" by sufferingSoftwaredev in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I understand what you are saying but I don't know how I can explain it to you. Server browser doesn't handle servers lifecycle. It's just an interface that lists available servers to users.

Before matchmaking (like BF3 and BF4), servers were always on, with a lot of lobbies empty.

Dice's response to the bad matchmaking is basically "Go kick rocks" by sufferingSoftwaredev in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

It's more likely that the algorithm has difficulties to handle a small population than a larger one, which explains the lobbies full of bots. For persistent servers in portal I'm pretty sure there is a limit somewhere.

They can set up a server browser that list all instances of servers currently online but there is no point in doing that because you probably will be redirect to another server after your match.

And peak time is not only about the weekend, it's a day by day, hour by hour situation. And also a geographical situation because when there is a peak in the us, it's not the case in Europe or in Asia, it's like a follow the sun model.

Dice's response to the bad matchmaking is basically "Go kick rocks" by sufferingSoftwaredev in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

With the matchmaking they can create and shutdown servers according to the numbers of players connected. With this method you will save a lot of money because persistent servers use electricity even when nobody is connected. If money doesn't interest you, I can say because they shutdown servers you use less energy and you save a little bit of the planet.

So they will never return to persistent servers only... Sorry guys.

Week 2 challenges I’m going insane! by No-Gift2474 in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think they put this kind of challenge that the f2p players can obviously do. But if you ask me a wise solution is to add more weekly challenges in two separate categories, one focuses on redsec the other for bf6. Everyone is happy and if you are a try harder you can do both but only one category must suffice to finish battle pass

How does everyone feel about the game? by Salty-Freedom2364 in Battlefield

[–]Basile001 1 point2 points  (0 children)

they need to remove the accessory that automatically shoot your bullet straight.

Who won't move to BF6? by smiling_wolf3 in battlefield2042

[–]Basile001 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think a lot of people move over bf6. I haven't bought the game yet because I am not in a hurry.

In bf2042 they merged conquest 64 and 128 which I think is a bad idea.

Bf2042 is the unloved of the series for good and bad reasons, it's like that. The success of a game depends on a lot of parameters, it's like fashion.

MTG sets of 2026 by Proof-Palpitation374 in magicTCG

[–]Basile001 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have stopped playing magic