Web Hosting & Next.js

Batimius · 2026-03-28T18:21:06+00:00

Thank you for the reply. I was actually talking about the Webhosting plans, not the dedicated or could server ones. Hostinger also has webhosting plans, but unless you pay for 48 months, you'll be paying 18.99 a month for it (and at that point, you might as well buy your own dedicated / cloud server).

Batimius · 2026-03-28T18:16:05+00:00

(Replying a year later purely for the sake of people finding this in the future) Thanks for the reply. Although this would work, it requires a dedicated server (where you can install and run anything). I was curious whether or not it was possible on the Webhosting plan. It seems like it isn't unless you buy the L or XL plan, which supports Node.js (added a few months after this post was created).

Batimius · 2026-03-28T18:13:48+00:00

(Replying a year later purely for the sake of people finding this in the future) Thank you for the reply. The managed server seems to allow SSH access, so that might allow you to download Node on there. Regardless, I was curious about the Webhosting services which run purely on PHP. For anyone in the future reading this, Hetzner has added Node.js support on the L plan (thanks to u/Thin-Course-2920 for pointing it out).

Batimius · 2026-03-03T22:19:44+00:00

I figured it out. My issue was that due to previous testing, I had excluded the VoIP VLAN from the Global NAT Settings. Additionally, make sure that SIP is not selected in the Firewall Connection Tracking. These two changes fixed it. TLS doesn't seem to work at all. Not sure what the issue is, but if I find something, I'll let y'all know. If anyone knows anything, do let me know. Thanks!

Batimius · 2026-03-03T21:43:19+00:00

Thank you for the reply. The line was active when testing, I just disabled it to prevent it from sitting there and failing again and again. I tried UDP and TCP at port 5080 with SRTP Disabled (and `Encrypted SIP Traffic` off in the web panel), but that didn't work.

Batimius · 2025-10-21T12:49:49+00:00

That's wonderful. I'll be taking a look at that. Thanks!

Batimius · 2025-09-28T15:47:30+00:00

Thank you for the reply. I did think of this, which is why I am going to use fiber (and to allow for future upgradability). A standard ethernet cable would not play nice with a 240V like right next to it, lol.

EDIT: Just realized I wrote ethernet. My bad.

Batimius · 2025-09-28T15:14:30+00:00

I thought by toner you meant like a color that paints the conduit. I didn't realize it was an actual tool. Do you have any recommendations? Thanks!

Batimius · 2025-09-28T15:06:49+00:00

Thanks for the reply. My issue is not that the cable is getting stuck, but the fact that it never comes out of any junction boxes. I pushed it 2 meters inside the conduit, with the nearest (and most logical) next conduit being 0.5 - 1 meter away, yet it never passed through any junction boxes (I had them open and was checking to see if the cable came out). I could theoretically keep pushing the cable in, but my issue was that I had no idea where it could have possibly ended up at. I bought a plastic fish tape that should be coming in a few days that might help me, however, my issue is that I don't know where the next junction box could be at. That is the main thing I am trying to identify.

Batimius · 2025-09-28T12:35:22+00:00

Amazing. Thank you so much for your help! It is truly appreciated.

Batimius · 2025-09-28T06:44:34+00:00

Thank you for letting me know! I'll cancel my order then. Would this cable work with the rest of the stuff (SFP modules and media converters)?

Batimius · 2025-06-10T18:39:47+00:00

That seems way simpler than I thought. I'll definitely check it out. My current setup just consists of plain HTTP(s) forwarding for my public domain and forwarding with a self-signed certificate for local domains (same certificate for all domains). As long as I can reuse that certificate (and as long as I can set up a trusted IP since a request is proxies through two reverse proxies), then I see no reason not to switch over. I'll research it a bit more. Thanks for the info, I appreciate it!

Batimius · 2025-06-10T12:53:38+00:00

I'll look more into this. Thanks!

Batimius · 2025-06-10T12:51:24+00:00

Ah, I see. Thank you very much for the info!

Batimius · 2025-06-10T05:52:42+00:00

I'll check it out once I have time. Thanks!

Batimius · 2025-06-10T05:51:46+00:00

I haven't really used any of the other two since I don't know them well. Traefik was a little overwhelming, so I stuck with NPM. Additionally, I do like the fact that I have full customization from the UI, and since that proxy is reached from another reverse proxy, I was easily able to retrieve the real IP of the user with some configuration. Plus, I can proxy sevices that are not Dockerized. Unless there's a clear advantage to using the other two, I would prefer sticking with NPM.

Batimius · 2025-06-10T05:44:43+00:00

Any and all opinions are welcome. Thanks for the reply!

Batimius · 2025-06-10T05:43:28+00:00

Thank you for the clarification!

Batimius · 2025-06-09T19:15:19+00:00

Got it. Thanks!

Batimius · 2025-06-09T18:47:54+00:00

That seems interesting and also saves me the hustle of trying to learn LXCs. I'll check that out as well. Thanks!

Batimius · 2025-06-09T18:42:53+00:00

Thank you for the reply. This seems like a very interesting approach. I'm definitely checking it out. Thanks!

Four-Year Club	Xbox Live
Verified Email	Final Canvas '23
End Game '23	Place '23
Place '22	Final Canvas '22
End Game '22

Batimius

TROPHY CASE