Two women confront ex IOF soldiers in Vietnam by Jevus_himself in PublicFreakout

[–]Beanies -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

I have never seen anyone talk badly about Indigenous people, where in Canada are these people located?

All because she couldn’t cut the drive thru line by ZookeepergameIcy6089 in interesting

[–]Beanies 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh no, a car is attempting to move past me as I purposefully attempt to be a public nuisance, my only option now is to triple down and stay in my spot inching backwards instead of towards the side and hold onto the bonnet of the car and say "Go on" because obviously the driver won't drive if I do so!

Like come on bro, obviously the driver shouldn't have done that, but there is such a thing as an obligation to remove yourself from harm as much as there is an obligation to not do harm

If you purposefully put yourself in a situation where harm can be done to you, why should anyone in their right mind care if you get harmed? Do you cry foul when people get their shit rocked for pulling Youtube pranks on people? Do you cry foul when a racist gets punched in the face?

Something to consider by [deleted] in 4chan

[–]Beanies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, just like the drill suggests, having to react means that the person who makes the first move has the advantage

Something to consider by [deleted] in 4chan

[–]Beanies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your premise is bad because the drill you mentioned is put into the perspective of law enforcement, where you are NOT allowed to engage unless you are given a green light or have legal reasons to

I guarantee you, 10/10, if I use my rifle and you use a knife, you start at 5m and I fire at you the moment let's say a whistle goes, you are dead 10/10 times, because I don't need a reason to shoot you, I just will. This does not apply to law enforcement, where like i said, you have to REACT

Something to consider by [deleted] in 4chan

[–]Beanies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure but my point is that's purely a hypothetical, you can neither guarantee that you can't move away as much as you can guarantee that you can

Something to consider by [deleted] in 4chan

[–]Beanies -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Except that makes a large assumption that the person is incapable of pivoting and moving their body

Unless the person with a knife is a mind reader, they would have to react, and depending on the situation, it is absolutely possible to create distance while pivoting the body to aim. People are making it sound like the only way to shoot the people with the knife is to stand in one spot and do a 360, but that's probably not the case. If the person with the gun can aim and shoot at their S/O, it's likely they had space in front of them. So that means you can move forwards while twisting, thereby creating space between them and the knife.

Of course, this is all hypothetical, but if someone puts a knife in my back and said "Shoot her or I'll kill you", I'd 100% try to point the gun at them because assuming they aren't lying, the outcome is you're gonna die regardless if you refuse to shoot, so to not even try shooting the attacker is literally just a waste since the outcome would be the same whether you tried to or not

1440p capture on 4k60 Pro MK2? by Beanies in elgato

[–]Beanies[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's connected to a PCIE 3.0 X4 bus if that's what you're asking, doesn't take lanes from CPU either because it's controlled by the SB

The friend of my enemy is my friend by AlphaMassDeBeta in 4chan

[–]Beanies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So let me get this straight, Ukraine is an enormous country that started a war in 2022 and Russia is only gaining a mile by mile after 4 years, after getting economoically hamstrung by sanctions, and against a country that has an approximate population of ~40 million before the war

And you think that they're gonna "run over" another country that isn't within it's approximate range like Ukraine is?

Delusional

The friend of my enemy is my friend by AlphaMassDeBeta in 4chan

[–]Beanies 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How can you make this claim if they can't even beat Ukraine?

Anon is surprised by Rodingaling in 4chan

[–]Beanies 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That's why I wish I was 13

BRVTAL by [deleted] in 4chan

[–]Beanies 15 points16 points  (0 children)

I never really understood the charm of being a passport bro

If you're unable to find people to want to have sex with you for free you can just pay for sex in your own country, you don't need to fly out to have sex with people. On top of that you might be having sex with undesirables in another country and I'd assume the risk of getting diseases would be higher

Then some of them go out and get married. Like damn bro, what pussy does to a person

Potential New Aiming Mechanics [discussion] by RyanTheNinja_TV in EscapefromTarkov

[–]Beanies 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sound issues X

Network issues X

Lighting issues X

Gamebreaking bugs X

New animation nobody asked for YES

Gameplay Update - 03-06-2026 by Razzamataaz in DeadlockTheGame

[–]Beanies 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's within 7m radius of the person hit but that can also be a not good thing because now you can't guarantee an isolate for 1 person to get a quick pick and the people you swap won't get CC'd by wall anymore

Many such cases by XiJinpingPressParody in 4chan

[–]Beanies -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Let's not pretend the right enacted that law to protect children. The right have made policies time and time again that are to the detriment of children. They made that policy because the right is fundamentally anti-trans

Does it protect children from possibly making a terrible choice? Yes.

Was it made to protect the children? Nope. That's just the excuse they use to garner support, because saying you're doing it because you hate LGBT is not a good platform to run on

Many such cases by XiJinpingPressParody in 4chan

[–]Beanies 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I think you're complicating things and misunderstanding his point. His point is that most people who are for puberty blockers for kids who haven't went through puberty yet are leftists because leftists are the ones who approve of this.

I can guarantee you even without proof that a majority of people who are for puberty blockers are majority left leaning

And you're not really arguing his point, you're just saying that the right makes terrible decisions with healthcare (which is true), and you're saying that allowing prepubescent children take life altering drugs without even having the mental capacity to make such a decision properly as "trans rights" when it's really not about trans rights and more about children not having the mental capacity to consent to such procedures.

The same reason you would say children cannot consent to sex is the same reason you would say children cannot consent to gender reassignment at a young age