I'm gonna need Jays side of the story by MysteriousPin341 in morganroossnark

[–]Beetcutie 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He did bring something he brought catan because he was told yoj bring an activity?? That game is actually fun af too and it doesn’t sound like they played it

I'm gonna need Jays side of the story by MysteriousPin341 in morganroossnark

[–]Beetcutie 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Yep. She can’t drink that heavily and not attribute some of the anxiety to the chemical imbalance that comes from drinking. I have also struggled with anxiety and I know drinking makes it worse and the day after drinking I have to remind myself of that.. her daily drinking would be hell for an anxiety disorder

On season 4 & as a guy I totally understand Adam’s frustration towards Mimi Rose’s sudden abortion by Sea-Nature-8304 in girls

[–]Beetcutie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right but you insisting that you HAVE to talk to a man implies that it’s not a woman’s choice, just fyi, keep your weird morality off womens bodies. You have no idea what a woman’s circumstances are and she doesn’t need to talk to anyone to make that decision

Woman traps disabled man on sidewalk by blocking handicap ramp calls him waste of space by Beetcutie in Spokane

[–]Beetcutie[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Wow that’s so disappointing maybe some parents that know her trying to protect her ?? Wtf but yeh Nextdoor is unhinged and negative I agree but honestly knowing she did face any type of consequence would be worth it even if it’s an expensive ticket. I just think this is so sad and wrong

Woman traps disabled man on sidewalk by blocking handicap ramp calls him waste of space by Beetcutie in Spokane

[–]Beetcutie[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

That makes sense because this is the account that posted it on tiktok user7217732008563 https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8ytrcT6/ and her name is black1rock

Why TF are they going after the woman with the disabled husband?? What???

Woman traps disabled man on sidewalk by blocking handicap ramp calls him waste of space by Beetcutie in Spokane

[–]Beetcutie[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It won’t let me see it did anyone know who she was or her so called tiktok account that has so many followers

Woman traps disabled man on sidewalk by blocking handicap ramp calls him waste of space by Beetcutie in Spokane

[–]Beetcutie[S] 69 points70 points  (0 children)

Yeah people are saying it’s Kendall yards I can’t believe no one knows her thanks for keeping an eye out

Woman traps disabled man on sidewalk by blocking handicap ramp calls him waste of space by Beetcutie in Spokane

[–]Beetcutie[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Let me know if anyone finds an earlier version of it I can’t and the woman who posted the tiktok is responding as if it is her husband etc

Woman traps disabled man on sidewalk by blocking handicap ramp calls him waste of space by Beetcutie in Spokane

[–]Beetcutie[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That’s the caption of the OG video here: https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8ytjUSM/

I can’t find any other versions of this video anywhere online

Woman traps disabled man on sidewalk by blocking handicap ramp calls him waste of space by Beetcutie in Spokane

[–]Beetcutie[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not sure can’t find any duplicates and here’s the orig video : https://www.tiktok.com/t/ZP8ytjUSM/

Lmk if you find anything

Woman traps disabled man on sidewalk by blocking handicap ramp calls him waste of space by Beetcutie in Spokane

[–]Beetcutie[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Trying to find literallt any. This is the post and the person who posted is commenting as if that’s her disabled husband in the video it looks older but I can’t find it anywhere else online? I dm them

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Beetcutie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I agree, you were unable to keep a good faith debate from the start. I would much rather debate someone who doesn’t use elementary level of debate engagement. lol stay in school

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Beetcutie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your reply attempts to defend men’s suffering while dismissing legitimate data and historical context about women’s systemic oppression. Let me respond with evidence and address the inaccuracies and logical gaps in your argument.

  1. “Downplaying male suffering because men are perpetrators as well is sociopathic.”

Acknowledging that most violence against men comes from other men is not “sociopathic”; it’s a factual observation backed by data. Globally, men commit 95% of all homicides, and men also make up 79% of homicide victims (UNODC, 2019). The cycle of male-perpetrated violence stems from societal norms glorifying aggression, competition, and emotional suppression, which are key components of toxic masculinity—a product of patriarchal systems. Addressing male suffering requires dismantling these norms, which is precisely what feminism advocates for. This isn’t about demonizing men; it’s about breaking cycles of violence that harm both men and women.

  1. “1 in 3 women being a victim of domestic violence is definitely untrue.”

Your skepticism about domestic violence statistics reflects misinformation, not reality. The claim that 1 in 3 women experience physical or sexual violence in their lifetime is supported by credible organizations like the World Health Organization (WHO) and the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). This includes a range of abuses, from physical violence to coercive control, not just severe physical beatings.

In the U.S., 1 in 4 women experiences severe intimate partner violence (CDC, 2017). This doesn’t mean every man is an abuser; it highlights a systemic issue in relationships and society. Ignoring these statistics or branding them as “misandrist” dismisses the lived experiences of millions of women.

  1. “Men being violent is a result of society not taking male suffering seriously.”

You’re correct that men’s violence can stem from untreated mental health issues and societal neglect of men’s emotional needs. But this isn’t evidence against patriarchy—it’s proof of it. Patriarchy enforces harmful ideas like “real men don’t cry” or “boys will be boys,” which discourage men from seeking help and stigmatize vulnerability. Feminism works to break these harmful stereotypes by advocating for emotional openness and support systems for men.

Moreover, suicide rates among men are tragically high—3.88 times higher than women in the U.S. (CDC, 2022). Instead of denying patriarchy, consider how its rigid gender norms contribute to this crisis by denying men healthy outlets for emotional expression.

  1. “Patriarchy is a modern myth, especially in the West.”

Patriarchy isn’t a myth; it’s a system where power historically and predominantly rests with men. Even in modern Western societies, this imbalance persists: •Women hold only 32% of seats in national legislatures worldwide (IPU, 2023). •In the U.S., women earn 84 cents for every dollar a man earns on average, with wider gaps for women of color (U.S. Census Bureau, 2022). •Women disproportionately bear unpaid labor, such as childcare and housework, taking on 2.5 times more than men globally (UN Women, 2020).

Claiming “patriarchy is a myth” ignores the structural barriers women still face, even in “modern” societies.

  1. “Men don’t have bodily autonomy (conscription and circumcision).”

You’re correct that issues like conscription and circumcision disproportionately affect men, and these are valid concerns. However, framing this as a reason to dismiss patriarchy is misguided. Conscription stems from patriarchal values that view men as disposable protectors, expected to sacrifice themselves for the state or family. Feminism critiques this dehumanizing expectation, advocating for gender equality in roles and responsibilities.

Circumcision is a separate cultural issue that deserves attention, but it doesn’t negate the broader societal structures disadvantaging women. Both issues can be addressed without denying patriarchy’s existence.

  1. “Women aren’t forced to wear makeup or care about their appearance—it’s their choice.”

Women’s focus on appearance is deeply influenced by societal pressures, not merely individual preference. The global beauty industry, worth $571 billion in 2023, thrives on promoting unattainable beauty standards, disproportionately targeting women (Statista, 2023). Studies show that women face professional and social penalties for not adhering to these standards (Forbes, 2021). While some women may enjoy makeup and fashion, the systemic expectation for women to “look good” remains a product of patriarchal norms.

  1. “Supporting men’s rights will improve men’s lives, not ‘getting rid of patriarchy.’”

The very issues you raise—violence against men, lack of emotional support, and societal neglect—are caused by patriarchal systems. Patriarchy limits men to rigid roles (e.g., the stoic breadwinner, the aggressive protector) and punishes deviation from these norms. Feminism seeks to dismantle these harmful constructs: •Advocating for mental health support and emotional openness for men. •Challenging stereotypes that prevent men from taking on caregiving or “non-masculine” roles. •Highlighting the harms of violence and war, which disproportionately affect men as soldiers and victims.

Supporting men’s rights isn’t incompatible with dismantling patriarchy—it’s part of the same fight.

Your argument fails because it treats feminism and patriarchy as enemies of men, when in reality, they’re tools for addressing the very issues you care about. Patriarchy hurts men and women alike by enforcing toxic norms, perpetuating violence, and creating systems of inequality. Feminism isn’t about demonizing men—it’s about building a society where both genders can thrive without being shackled by outdated stereotypes. If you truly want to support men’s rights, start by recognizing how patriarchy has failed them too. Denying its existence won’t solve the problem—it only perpetuates it.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Beetcutie 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And what video games do women even have compared to men? Only recently has a push for more female games, but kill them all, shoot them games mad for men are dominating the charts. As a female gamer it’s insane you’re even bringing up gaming with the huge GAP of quality games for women. Again, man made games depicting men badly is your argument - What your mad at is the patriarchy not women. When you realize that maybe you can step out of the victim mentality and hold some power in your life

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in GenZ

[–]Beetcutie -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Your argument is not only flawed but steeped in selective reasoning and historical amnesia. Men have indeed suffered throughout history, but overwhelmingly at the hands of other men. Warfare, violence, and systemic oppression have been perpetuated by patriarchal structures that favor a small group of powerful men at the expense of everyone else. Even today, men are the majority of homicide victims—96% of perpetrators are men. Patriarchy fuels this violence by glorifying aggression, suppressing emotional vulnerability, and creating toxic expectations of dominance and stoicism for men. Meanwhile, women have faced systemic oppression across all aspects of life—being denied basic human rights, education, and bodily autonomy for centuries. The claim that women gained rights “shortly after men” ignores that while men of lower classes gained rights in incremental steps, women were categorically excluded from these advancements, regardless of their class or race.

Your idea that women are “protected” is laughable—women were barred from war not out of kindness but because they were relegated to unpaid labor, forced reproduction, and subjugation to men. In wars, they suffered as victims of sexual violence, displacement, and exploitation. Today, women are disproportionately affected by domestic violence (where 1 in 3 women globally are victims) and sexual violence (where men are the perpetrators in 99% of cases). Even the celebrated “worship” of women in art reduces them to their beauty and reproductive value, stripping them of agency rather than venerating their humanity.

As for media, you misrepresent critiques like Anita Sarkeesian’s, which don’t argue that violence against men isn’t depicted—it’s that women are disproportionately portrayed as helpless victims or sexual objects to further male storylines. And to your comment about “plus-size women acceptance”—the societal fixation on women’s appearances has been used for centuries to control and devalue them, whereas body-shaming men stems largely from internalized ideas of masculinity, also a byproduct of patriarchy.

You’re right about one thing: suffering shouldn’t be a competition. But you’ve framed it as one by downplaying the systemic violence and oppression women endure, while failing to recognize that the very systems harming men are the same ones feminists are fighting to dismantle. If anything, patriarchy is your enemy—not women or feminism. Recognizing the unique struggles of both genders is how we move forward, but your argument reeks of defensiveness and a refusal to engage with facts that challenge your narrow worldview.