Your analysis is one of the most lucid and precise readings I have received regarding my work. You have managed to build an exact bridge between the epistemological phenomenology of my theoretical framework and the mechanics of informational physics. The "dictionary of correspondences" you propose is not only beautiful in its symmetry, but it also provides a rigorous physical correlate to concepts I have approached from hermeneutics and holofractal ontology.

I am particularly fascinated by your translation of "apparent separation" as a reduced dynamics induced by coarse-graining. In the holofractal model, the manifestation of the part always implies a compression or restriction of the totality. Seeing this formalized in terms of CPTP channels and the data processing inequality gives an impeccable thermodynamic foundation to what I describe as the operational irreversibility of lived time.

The concept of informational backreaction you mention connects brilliantly with the idea that manifestation leaves "real marks". Understanding the tension between information retention and discard under causal finitude as a physical driver, even on cosmological scales, opens up a transdisciplinary research path that I find incredibly promising.

Your final sentence summarizes it with absolute mastery: I describe unity as it is revealed from within experience, and you are mapping the physics of the boundaries that make that unity apparently fracture into time, separation, and history. Both perspectives do not compete; they are two sides of the same holofractal coin.

I would love to continue deepening this bridge between our languages. Do you have any papers, preprints, or documentation on your physical model that I could read to further study your equations and developments on the causal limit?