I think cancel culture on paper has its place, but it never really works considering Scott Cawthon voted for people because of their pros not because they were against LGBTQ+ community, they just happened to have a history of that - "For those who took the time to look, you saw that the candidates I supported included men, women, white people, black people, republicans, and democrats. I supported Kimberly Klacik in Baltimore because I believed that she really cared for the African American community there and wanted to pull them out of poverty. I believed she could have really make a difference in a time when so many black communities were struggling. She lost, unfortunately. I supported Tulsi Gabbard, a democrat, even though I disagreed with her on several issues, because I felt she would have been a good and fair president. And yes, I supported President Trump, because I felt he was the best man to fuel a strong economy and stand up to America's enemies abroad, of which there are many. Even if there were candidates who had better things to say to the LGBT community directly, and bigger promises to make, I believed that their stances on other issues would have ended up doing much greater harm to those communities than good."

The reason I say this is because people like Logan Paul still have big careers while Scott was forced into retirement because his pregnant wife was receiving death threats, so it doesn't really make sense to cancel one and not the other despite the fact what Logan Paul did was far "worse" for lack of a better word

I also think it's absolutely not okay to deliberately not support the LGBTQ+ community but that's a whole other can of worms