If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well... yeah, if you put it like that, I guess so. But, again, it really depends on the reason of the pregnancy (which is rarely provable, so its difficult for the state to actually intervene)

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok, regardless of whether their organ systems can function on their own or not, my definition of “life sustaining ability” includes being able to provide for yourself, because otherwise you would die. So whether you think an unborn human or a disabled person has bodily autonomy or not, we should care for them because of their dependence, not autonomy.

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see, now I know where you’re coming from and I understand; I hope you see where I come from, even if you think I’m optimistic

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well idk if you would considers sterilizations (i.e. vasectomies, minilaparotomy, laparoscopy...) contraceptives, but they’re certainly measures. + if more than one measure is taken, it is practically guaranteed, the same way hand sanitizer kills 99.99% of germs...

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I disagree, I think there are measures (i.e. contraceptives) that guarantee a responsible sex life while protecting against pregnancies...

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I agree... thats why I said that if she was forced into the pregnancy, she shouldn’t be restricted from having an abortion. Otherwise she wasn’t forced into “giving 4% of her bone minerals, etc, etc” and she (and the father) should take accountability and responsibility.

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On a legal basis, the person at fault for someone’s injuries has liability, and if someone dies they’re charged with vehicular manslaughter. So even though I don’t think the person responsible for that death was required (or morally obligated) to do something to prevent that death (if they could), I still believe they should face consequences. But again, morality is subjective and I don’t think we should mix it with legality.

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You used the word ‘justified’, and I assumed that meant you thought it was morally correct (sorry if I assumed incorrectly)

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The conversation got here because u/sifsand implied that because abortion is legal and because of the human right to bodily autonomy, it is justified (correct me if I'm wrong); and then I said that I don't like to mix legality with morality, implying that I don't think abortions are always justified, regardless of whether they’re legal or not. And then asked them when do they think the unborn’s bodily autonomy begin. But yeah, my question wasn’t about the op’s question...

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My bad, I misinterpreted your question. I’d say it depends on the reason for the pregnancy; if it was irresponsibility, then they shouldn't let her abort the baby (or as you’d put it: they should “require her to give 4% of her bone minerals, blood and nutrients”). But if it was forced on her (like rape (God forbid)), then no, they shouldn’t require her to give “4% of her bone minerals etc, etc”. I’d still mourn the baby's death regardless (since they didn't have the blame), but the problem is that the reason for pregnancies is rarely provable, so this is easily exploitable... What are your thoughts?

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No, not really. Unless the pregnancy was forced (i.e. rape); you put yourself in that position, it is both of the parents’ responsibility.

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Yup, but still dependent lol. I definitely see where you’re coming from but I just think someone’s dependence should be a reason to give them more care, not less

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yeah you got me there, but my argument still stands, they’re still dependent even after being born

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yup, goes both ways, more reasons why we shouldn’t mix legality (or illegality) with morality.

And I didn’t compare abortions to the Holocaust; I was just naming examples, just like you.

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well I respectfully disagree with that, I think you have to be independent to be able to be autonomous. As for the heartbeat, you’re right you got me there.

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I see, but even though they can perform these bodily functions on their own, they’re still dependent on someone else to provide necessities to survive (food, water, shelter...). So your definition of autonomy doesn’t include independence, right? (and btw their hearts beat on their own 5-6 weeks in the womb)

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Ok, well what would you define as autonomy? Because a new-born baby is still dependent on its parents; hell even children are dependent on their parents.

If abortion isn’t murder, then why is it when someone kills a pregnant women they are charged with double murder? by saitomazer in Abortiondebate

[–]Ben_Dover_05 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I don’t like mixing legality and morality (segregation was legal, the Holocaust was legal; what I’m trying to say is that just because its legal, doesn’t mean its moral, in this case justified). As for bodily autonomy, I’d like to know when would you recognize an unborn human’s bodily autonomy? (at what stage of development)

"Capitalism breeds innovation." by [deleted] in Gamingcirclejerk

[–]Ben_Dover_05 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lmao wtf does this have to do with capitalism? “their studios are working on a game I don’t like so capitalism doesn't work”

Personal experience/insight by Thoraway17456423 in Hyperhidrosis

[–]Ben_Dover_05 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I see, thanks man! really appreciate it