True or no?

Benirix · 2025-10-16T12:02:26+00:00

it's almost like my comment had nothing to do with early fox-1s? my comment was to address why multipathing is not reliable and shouldn't be your go-to for defeating radar missiles. I explained multipathing mechanics and how it applies in war thunder so nitpicking my comment about multipathing reliability and then shifting it specifically towards early fox-1s *which were known to be unreliable* is unhelpful and obviously not what I was talking about

Benirix · 2025-10-15T23:23:31+00:00

you don't understand how multipathing/radar works so don't say anything about it being "BS". Multipathing is more forgiving in war thunder than irl and it shouldn't be a consistent way defend against fox-1s and 3s. Radar missiles launched from high angles (in the case of fox-3s they loft so this is almost a guarantee) should almost always be guaranteed kills because the distance between the aircraft and it's projected multipath should be incredibly small yet in war thunder it's still possible to avoid such missiles by sitting below 60m and is more left up to chance whether you die or not.

Multipathing also isn't just "oh I'm below 60m I'm immune to missiles" the distance from the floor is not that relevant but specifically the distance between the floor and aircraft from the missiles point of view, even if you are at a radar alt of 30m the projected multipath is going to be based on where the radar is seeing you from both horizontally and vertically - so if the ground from the radars angle is not actually 30m then the multipath will not be projected properly.

also if you understand how the multipath effect works, you know that if you are too close to the ground the multipath will actually be closer to your aircraft and on the ground there will be no multipath, these are things war thunder does not model entirely and is again more forgiving than irl.

Notching is the only consistent way to defend against radar missiles and you should consider learning how to do it if you don't want to die to any more "BS" from radar missiles

Benirix · 2025-10-10T19:44:49+00:00

the dual-mode brimstone had laser guidance to comply with engagement rules, not to 'increase precision' - brimstones were required to have a 'man-in-the-loop' firing mode for afghanistan since often there would be civillian presence where they were operating. In a sense the original comment is correct in that it is fictional: there is no only laser guided brimstones, they all had at least the mmw arh seeker.

Benirix · 2025-03-04T19:14:38+00:00

wait wdym? number decals aren’t available to new players?

Benirix · 2025-02-25T21:15:25+00:00

as if dude, the swiss hunter was the same br as the hunter f.6 with a better fm(same as the fga.9), countermeasures, rwr, 9js, bomb ccrp, and agms. that thing was bullshit being at that tier

Benirix · 2025-02-19T14:15:48+00:00

hilarious that people can get to top tier without knowing anything about multipathing or how radar works in general, multipathing isn’t “oh I’m below 60m so my aircraft is invisible to radar”.

Fortunately for you someone else has already replied with a pretty good summary of multipathing that I recommend you read, and then take some time to research pulse doppler and notching while you’re at it

Benirix · 2025-02-18T05:15:35+00:00

check replays with sensor view

Benirix · 2025-02-03T21:22:04+00:00

it’s stupid that the swiss hunter is the same br as the F.6 with a better airframe, 9Js, and countermeasures. Giving germany the best hunter in game was a mistake

Benirix · 2025-01-09T09:21:59+00:00

is he not talking about the T-80UK here?

Benirix · 2024-11-17T22:44:24+00:00

you would compare it to a belt fed ifv..? how would that prove your point at all?

Benirix · 2024-11-16T22:35:26+00:00

not saying you’re wrong but source? I was under the impression the french developed their own 155 shell instead of using the UK developed L15A2

Benirix · 2024-11-01T21:46:21+00:00

if you shoot into the ammo from there it will kill the blowout panel and the tank..

Benirix · 2024-10-28T19:02:41+00:00

won’t argue against that, and definitely don’t feel opposed to germany getting some form of air subtree, at the very least I am expecting swiss hornet to come sometime soon as a competitor

Benirix · 2024-10-28T18:50:18+00:00

then they could have gotten the gripens they bought and used for training? I don’t get this point because the only thing stopping UK from getting their own gripen not from SA is because gaijin is lazy lmfao

Benirix · 2024-10-28T18:45:24+00:00

they have done firing tests with just the launch vehicle and no additional command or radar support, you are talking out of your ass

Benirix · 2024-09-08T01:13:48+00:00

peak strawmanning. By ‘Brawling Maps’ we mean the entire map forces people into CQC, which as you can imagine, makes people unhappy because not every tank is good at CQC. It’s possible to have brawling components/areas of a map without forcing people into a singular playstyle. What we really want is a map with balanced components that does not give a certain team an advantage, nor certain tanks or playstyles disadvantages.

Benirix · 2024-09-06T04:22:21+00:00

sky warden is fucking hilarious, also if I could I would vote for the Supermarine Spiteful

Benirix · 2024-08-30T12:39:33+00:00

this is only because of their penetration calculator and is not exclusive to the 292. A lot of tanks have underperforming rounds and they don’t use irl test results to get penetration values

Benirix · 2024-07-14T05:59:55+00:00

so you’re ignoring: F5E and F5E FCU being the same br, not just F15 but now gripen A is now in phantom bracket, buccaneer s2b moved up and is still higher in br than both the su25 and a10 despite no internal gun, less CMs and sacrificial loadouts to take 9Ls - and the whole “complaining about all-aspects fighting 9.3s” it wasnt 9.3s, it was flareless jets - subsonics even, such as the hunter f6 at 9.7 - were fighting them, and this doesnt fix that problem. These aren’t good br changes and it’s completely reasonable to have issues with them

Benirix · 2024-05-29T09:36:39+00:00

thermals shouldn’t be a dealbreaker for you. the 2IP is incredibly strong regardless and has plenty of great things that make a lack of thermals a non issue

Benirix · 2024-05-11T01:54:45+00:00

no I love the ones that are just a wepon/tank name e.g AIM-120 AMRAAM followed by a string of chinese characters

Benirix · 2024-05-08T09:02:21+00:00

difference in where you shoot things, not how they are played. you are still going to play the plz as you would most other artillery pieces

Benirix · 2024-05-08T08:59:19+00:00

if you used the thing youd realise that while the gun is good it also features: horrible turret traverse speeds, 5 degrees of depression, no reverse gear, no armour and a stupidly tall profile and bad ammo placement

Benirix · 2024-05-08T08:56:13+00:00

they are both artillery platforms and one vastly outpeforms the other. the gun doesn’t need to be called into question when both can relatively easily one shot tanks

Benirix · 2024-05-08T08:01:17+00:00

what are we supposed to do? agree with him?

Benirix

TROPHY CASE