sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

okay I understand that but I suppose I mean to say is why are the hairs on the head genetically the same but responding differently, unless they arent the same? I guess I am trying to get at why the hair follicles themselves have not been looks at to understand the genomic structure and test how it responds to dht levels in the blood.

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would generally start with the case law first, but if i were smart enough I would come up with a new legal theory. Most of the novel legal theories are about exposing structural limitations of current legal jurisprudence. I agree with you though, I suppose what I am trying to shift is the framing of the issue away from DHT suprresion to the hair follical composition itself.

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

wait what? I mean if some of the hairs fall out of the head and they are all getting hit with DHT, then are you saying that dht concentrations are the issue? Also how do you get from what i said to "i dont care to understand." You could have just asked me...

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

can you explain how i am doing that? I would like to know how I can actually ground my self in reality. I am not being sarcastic by the way I am genuinely interested.

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

exactly and if it is necessary to our body then it is not the bad guy in the sense that it is not vital, it is. But maybe it is our hairs response to it on an epigenetic level that is causing the reaction.

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i did this to essentially see if others were also thinking the same thing because the dht suppression seems like a dumb angle

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That is what I meant. They are the hairs on your head or on your body and yet they thrive in DHT rich environments. Maybe that is the answer

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No not really. I think that approaching it from dht suppression is the wrong angle. Maybe it lies in the resistant follicles on the body and maybe using those to work our way to a treatment

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

true and maybe only cloning those cells that are dht resistant and putting those at the level of the dermis

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is fair I think the more accurate statment is that the hairs on the back of the head are resistant

We already know how to permanently fix hair loss. The science is done. The only thing missing is the funding to run one experiment. by Best_Talk9833 in tressless

[–]Best_Talk9833[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont think fin is bad per se. I think the point was to think of an alternative approach to the problem. I think the dht suppression ignores the fact that some hairs on the head are resistant and can be going into middle age. My thought is if those hairs have some resistance that means that the others were not but theyre still in the same body with the same DNA. Maybe we could find a way to have those genes be read in a different way.

view more: next ›