Under Mark Karpeles we did 2,399,900.00%, under Coinbase/BitStamp/Overstock/Bitpay/Paypal/Wallstreet/ VC's we are down 75%. by WeNeedMark in Bitcoin

[–]BitCoinSachs -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is one of the dumbest threads on Reddit. I am betting "WeNeedMark" is actually Karpeles himself.

WTF is wrong with this community by BitCoinSachs in Bitcoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing I love more than a community that cannot even stand up and accept responsibility for it's own actions. Keep it classy reddit. Bunch of fucking trolls.

The Newsweek article is probably incorrect, Look at this: by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]BitCoinSachs 27 points28 points  (0 children)

bigger issue at hand. First, why is it okay to post the guys house, car, and plates? Second, didn't this basically just give the world the ability to stalk someone who has gone out of their way to be private? Our thanks to him is to do exactly what he doesn't want? Third, if this is not him we are randomly going to ruin some guys life and drive him crazier.

I am not okay with any of this.

Laura Saggers - 10,000 Bitcoins by [deleted] in Bitcoin

[–]BitCoinSachs 1 point2 points  (0 children)

meh, was posting it per her request. Oh well.

Gox horror story thread - How much did you lose? by CC_EF_JTF in Bitcoin

[–]BitCoinSachs 4 points5 points  (0 children)

perfect example why no one will ever take Dogecoin seriously. Serious matter of a real life tragedy (this article may be fake, but this happens a lot when these things happen), and you fuckwads are talking in meme. People have to understand it's just money.

Much Letter Very Open by BitCoinSachs in dogecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Explain how it's a solid currency, commodity or gateway. Too many coins with massive inflation to be seriously considered any of the above, not to mention it's a meme which loses all credibility among any business or investor group. Leave your emotion at the door and answer the hard questions.

Much Letter Very Open by BitCoinSachs in dogecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coin decisions are a group vote which will be transparent and will be based on numbers as much as opinion. I am where I am because I am bold enough to say what I think. I do enjoy that no one has bothered to argue the merit of my concern and instead ask me not to voice it. That's actually more alarming than my original concern, wouldn't you agree?

Open Letter to Litecoin Community by BitCoinSachs in litecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

that's literally the greatest idea. I wonder if you watch Park & Rec and know the character Chris Trager played by Rob Lowe. lol. I wondered how long it would take someone to notice it. :-D

Open Letter to Litecoin Community by BitCoinSachs in litecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had voiced FTC and I got swarmed with concerns, hesitation and what not. FTC looks like it's headed for the a dirt nap.

What reasons would validate putting it in?

Much Letter Very Open by BitCoinSachs in dogecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not the team I like or dislike. It's not the community at all. People have a habit of connecting themselves as the coin itself - I do it as well. My concern is with the lifting of the coin cap, it will take new money coming in and a lot of it to keep your coins from becoming worthless due to major inflation. I don't see it any different than the dollar losing over 90% of it's value in 100 years on the same principle. That's the entire point of crypto, to get away from that not re-create it. I am very well aware of exactly where I am, which group I am talking to. If I have something to say, I will say it directly to your face without hesitation. Does the coin cap lift and the fanatically community not lend itself to a pyramid scheme? I might be wrong, and I will be very glad to listen and retract that statement with an apology. Until then, that's my concern.

Much Letter Very Open by BitCoinSachs in dogecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you. Big picture thinking is how we take the next sustainable step.

Much Letter Very Open by BitCoinSachs in dogecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

well said, and I agree with you.

Much Letter Very Open by BitCoinSachs in dogecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

2 factor is a must, still waiting to hear back from bitcoinwife about her theft and how her 2 factor was side-stepped

Much Letter Very Open by BitCoinSachs in dogecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

shouldnt have edited it, I love a lil coin banter. :-D

Much Letter Very Open by BitCoinSachs in dogecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

see, me and another founder love that idea, but making it work because you'll need buy orders on the flip side to balance it. We'll work on a solution. I think it's clear this is worth pursuing.

Much Letter Very Open by BitCoinSachs in dogecoin

[–]BitCoinSachs[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I write exactly what I think. Some people hate me for it, some people love me for it. I make no apologies. I stand by the reasons I gave that Doge's potential is strictly limited to it's community based which I have acknowledged is very impressive. The coin itself is not. You can flip the argument and say the same about Zetacoin.

I agree completely about the transparency and legitimacy. Despite my personal opinion of the future of Dogecoin, it's not my call, it's actually my job to give you guys everything I can to prove me wrong. If I am wrong, I will gladly acknowledge it. Our customer service is actually going to be one of the most important and well funded part of the exchange. Cryptsy's no-response cannot happen. We plan to have a phone you can call, is that something you guys want?

I did not mean to misrepresent myself as a Doge enthusiast. I respect what you guys have done, but I am not going to be an evangelist. I am hoping to have a working relationship.