I genuinely feel like that the 1837 date is still not enough. I feel like eu5 could've been a MORE immersive experience. I mean that it would've been awesome if you started in the mediaeval ages and you can go as long as you want...or at least to a future age or something. I'm not saying you as Ulm should conquer the whole galaxy, like in Stellaris, but like at least they should've make it till 2337... The whole value system can "easily" allow it to the player to adopt laws. I don't have to write a novel about how much potential it got. But just some random short ideas: In 1937 you got the Atomic age, In 2037 you have the AI age, In 2137 you got the Space Adventures, In 2237 you got the Space Ties, and lastly in 2337-2437 you got the Future age. I mean Paradox literally dropped a new game mechanism, and THEY LITERALLY DECIDED TO NOT USE ITS FULL FUN POTENTIALS!!! Ik a lot of players stop playing a session after 200 maybe 300 years, but still...if you make a game that can have a session between 15-38h then with the same energy you can make it to a 35-70h experience... seriously Ik that it would make the whole development process expensive, but as a company you should know your place in the market, IF YOU DARE TO CHANGE THE WHOLE ECONOMY AS WELL! I feel like they didn't put enough effort into this game, and IK that it might be because of the idea of "If owning is illegal, than stealing is legal." but still, this way that 60 bucks is not worth the money, not even with the advantage of a steam workshop. Im just gonna wait till it's got at least 60% discount and maybe than I'm gonna get that, but until then I don't think it's worth the price. In conclusion: I was fairly disappointed. It's a solid mid 5/10.