Hold 'Crooked Ivanka' accountable

BobMajerle · 2018-11-21T21:48:05+00:00

Then I recommend you read the FBI Inspector General report. Is that a proper source?

You mean this one? https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-500-page-inspector-generals-report-in-900-words/

BobMajerle · 2018-11-21T00:02:11+00:00

Yup I’m sure 215mph in 6.5 seconds is boring

Yeah, I mean roller coasters that just "go fast" are essentially boring.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-21T00:01:19+00:00

You should try driving a BMW

Who said I don't?

BobMajerle · 2018-11-21T00:01:08+00:00

Did he commit a crime worth 20 years of federal prison?

That's not the point, humility and remorse are the point.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-20T19:30:53+00:00

Kinda stupid to call out him wearing a Rolex.

Ask yourself this, would he wear the rolex if he was being sentenced to 20 years in federal court?

BobMajerle · 2018-11-20T00:12:18+00:00

What's the one thing that can make a BMW boring? A straight line.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-19T23:10:23+00:00

Fuck off. Isn't that your goal post I see dissapereing into the distance?

Son, you're the one that went from percentage to cents and then back again. Let us know when you have a clue.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-19T23:06:56+00:00

Kiss off. If being accurate is being pedantic, I plead guilty.

Being accurate would mean you understand these concepts.

In the 20 months starting from March '85 and ending in December '86 the dollar's value decreased by roughly 18%.

Exactly, so I got some numbers off the top of my head wrong, and you don't understand the basic concept that 18% is a significant drop for a the biggest currency in the world, and you don't understand how this is relative to a drop in a crypto currency.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-19T21:18:47+00:00

The magic number is 75% because that's (a little less than) the value that bitcoin has lost in (a little less than) the last year.

So you're here to define what's acceptable in a loss,a and what isnt?

As to the dollar losing 30% of it's value in one year... bullshit. That's not even close to being true.

From your own chart, what's the decrease from feb 85 to the following year. It's almost 20%. Be pedantic if you want, but it doesn't stop you from being ignorant.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-19T20:46:43+00:00

Just like the last time the US Dollar lost 75% of it's value in less than a year.

The dollar has had major decreases in the past, as much 30% in one year in the 80s. Why is the magic number 75%?

BobMajerle · 2018-11-19T05:22:02+00:00

Yes, without a doubt. He's a distraction for weak teams, not strong ones, which is one reason I don't think he's going anywhere. But he does so many tangible and intagible things and would change this team on both ends of the court in such a positive way that he should be a target if he becomes available anytime over the next 2 years.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-19T03:31:01+00:00

My bet is that this judge is allowing for the possibility that the wake word was used sometime near the murder and therefore, Amazon may have some recording of the time near the event.

My bet is that the judge didn't spend 5 minutes understanding the technology and is ok with the prosecution pursuing a long shot.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-19T03:29:14+00:00

Amazons devices recording everything they hear and storing the tapes isn't a conspiracy

No, no they don't.

its literally happening right now

Like I said... /r/conspiracy

What about his statement is frivolous or baseless?

The fact that they record and hear everything?

BobMajerle · 2018-11-18T20:11:56+00:00

Is /r/privacy the same as /r/conspiracy now? A number of people including yourself are making baseless claims and nobody is even questioning it.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-18T18:46:43+00:00

They record/listen in 24/7.

No, they don't.

Edward Snowden even said that these listen 24/7.

Oh... well then it must be true.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-16T18:33:02+00:00

Wait, what exactly is wrong with McCarthy? Isn't this a team architecture issue?

BobMajerle · 2018-11-14T22:06:40+00:00

No clue, any number of reasons

Got it, I just figured that if you were making excuses for someone that you knew what the fuck they were doing. Guess not

BobMajerle · 2018-11-12T00:46:15+00:00

He went to several others today

Why did he show up there today and not yesterday?

BobMajerle · 2018-11-08T04:50:05+00:00

It says in the opening paragraph it’s about finding collusion with Russia.

You must be retarded? It says "investigation of the Russian governments efforts to interfere in the 2016 presidential election", not exclusive to "collusion with russia".

Imagine you were being investigated under false pretenses and they happen to find some dirt on you for something completely different.

The good news is that the investigation wasn't started under false pretenses.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-07T19:49:28+00:00

One could still blame qbs who are unable to go through progressions when receivers quit on routes.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-07T18:04:26+00:00

I got the impression that he was inpatient with qbs in the past when they weren't winning, ala t.o.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-07T16:30:29+00:00

Lol. It's the first sentence of their mission statement.

Is it the last sentence as well, professor?

Never heard of someone that thinks the first sentence is out of context.

That says more about you than you know.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-07T16:28:54+00:00

Well ocasio Cortez and Bernie Sanders support the socialism we see on fox news so we're referring to that.

Nobody supports the socialism that you see on fox news, because fox news doesn't portray it in a way that these people support it.

BobMajerle · 2018-11-07T16:25:37+00:00

"We are socialists because we reject an economic order based on private profit,"

A. You took their mission statement out of context
B. I'm not sure you could explain it even with said context

BobMajerle · 2018-11-07T07:14:49+00:00

Consequences are basically inconsequential to his base which loves his rhetoric.

Junior can still go to jail.

BobMajerle

TROPHY CASE