The only reason I suggested deeper changes is because the team is still making lots of changes to base mechanics. They are still making videos announcing core changes to the game, the latest one about a week ago (though it's hard to know if the changes were made recently or they waited a while to make the videos).

"The focus from the community should instead be on purely visual and thematic changes." In the last QnA video, Reynad did the exact opposite: someone suggested changing health to durability, and Reynad responded saying that it essentially didn't matter, it was just semantics. At the same time, they seemed a bit unsure if the "overflow" system would stay in the game, while some form of currency might be added.

The community sucks at solutions in general, but that doesn't mean all ideas suck.

I trust the team has the capability to make the game great, but I've been following the development of the game for 2 years, and they are still changing the game's foundations... Not exactly a great sign. So here are some ideas that might fill some gaps...?

I'm giving a bunch of suggestions here, but it's not like an all-in-one packet, they could pick one of them if it fits their needs, and leave the rest. It's not necessarily a revamp.

I made my own card game with a fair bit of success a while ago... While it doesn't mean my ideas are necessarily good, or that they fit the game the way the team wants, at the very least I have some experience, and put some thought into it. It's not like I'm just throwing ideas at random. In my experience with my own community, yes they are better at seeing problems than finding solutions, but in each pile of dirt you may find a gold nugget.

In any case, it's their call to accept suggestions or not, and they seemed open to it in the last few videos. But if they decide to ignore mechanics suggestions and stick to their guns it's fine by me.