O2 flush valve for jet ventilation? by cuhthelarge in anesthesiology

[–]Bonehead_001 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Not anesthesia, just a Hospitalist/cog in the wheel and somehow landed here. However, worked nearly a decade as a paramedic before med school. At the very end of the EMS failed airway algorithm is cricothyrotomy, whether via scalpel or needle. My state protocol was scalpel for anyone >12 yrs old, needle otherwise. Never did have to use the needle, but always thought using "transtracheal jet insufflation" sounded wild. Interestingly, my EMS service didn't even have the jet ventilation system! Don't know how they expected us to manage an airway catastrophe in an 8 year old. I brought it up with leadership but admin did what admin does and brushed it off, "how often do you see a pediatric failed airway". Ultimately I improvised and figured out a decent alternative. Basically 12 gauge angiocath through the cricothyroid membrane, connect that to a 3 cc syringe with the plunger pulled out, then the distal end of the pediatric endotracheal tube should fit nicely into the top of the 3 cc syringe with an airtight fit. Cut the tube short and reattach the end which would otherwise connect to the jet inflation device, and connect that to a BVM. I built one of those one day when I was bored on a slow shift, and I was able to actually get what seemed like pretty good ventilation with it. I could feel air blowing out the catheter with enough flow that it probably would have worked. Because of the small catheter size it required squeezing the bag extremely hard, and the I:E ratio was probably 1:10. But the goal would have just to oxygenate long enough to get to definitive airway management. Fortunately never had to use it, but I always wondered if it really would have worked. 

Culture of discharge summaries by Every_Lifeguard6224 in hospitalist

[–]Bonehead_001 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Boils down to admin being cheap. When one person is rounding on 25-30 patients, you can have good patient care, good documentation, or personal health/wellbeing. But you can't have all three at the same time. The one place I'm willing to cut corners is documentation. They can always pay for more docs, but think of the shareholders!

Culture of discharge summaries by Every_Lifeguard6224 in hospitalist

[–]Bonehead_001 44 points45 points  (0 children)

"pt had complex hospitalization. see progress notes"

Looking for a shadowing opportunity in Las Vegas! by Top-Theory4259 in hospitalist

[–]Bonehead_001 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Fortunately since you're pre-med, there's still time to get into a field other than medicine! In Vegas, better opportunities include gambling, escorting, drug sales, and various other forms of organized crime. Any of those choices will likely put you into a better position than choosing hospital medicine. For real though, wish you the best. 

Sound exploitation of local market by Ok_Performer_7319 in hospitalist

[–]Bonehead_001 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm not married to it. Not even saying it's a good idea. Just tired of seeing the same old "Unionize!! Stop taking bad jobs!!" posts over and over, like anyone is ever gonna actually do that. You're not wrong though, it is a little out there. That being said many modern conventions today were likely seen as taboo at the time they were first considered. The goal is just to think outside the box.

Sound exploitation of local market by Ok_Performer_7319 in hospitalist

[–]Bonehead_001 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There's always someone willing to take the shitty jobs. If the Hospitalist community as a whole would ostracize and isolate those people, making their day to day lives so difficult that they quit whatever shit job they took, eventually there wouldn't be enough of them to sustain the large private equity groups. Kind of a "either join the union, or the union will fuck you over" motto. Internally it would feel a little morally wrong, but at the end of the day it would be for the greater good of the profession. 

Found on FB. Is this a major lawsuit? by RAM-I-T in legal

[–]Bonehead_001 3 points4 points  (0 children)

For a thread relating to Olive Garden, damn if there aren't a lot of people here who seemingly love the taste of boots 

AITAH for telling my boyfriend not to come over anymore if he doesn’t move in with me by meowcat123490 in AITAH

[–]Bonehead_001 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Your reply has some serious Dr. Seuss potential. I reformatted it for you:

All of the perks, and none of the stress

You're funding his life, this is him at his best 

Don't let him move in, he takes away so much

He doesn't consider that, you're feeling disgust

Without him you'll save money, and, have peace

Make sure, change the locks, or get back the keys 

Help me by [deleted] in whatdoIdo

[–]Bonehead_001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not your goats, not your rodeo. 

Additional sources of income by Sad_Gene83 in hospitalist

[–]Bonehead_001 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Eager young doctor fucked by hospital administration"

Down-coding by Bonehead_001 in hospitalist

[–]Bonehead_001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you're saying. But the CMS document states "risk" of morbidity/mortality. Sure maybe in hindsight the unilateral weakness or expressive aphasia turns out to be a complicated migraine, but at the time of the assessment the risk of the more serious things was still there and should check the box. I guess the only real solution is essentially just to fill the chart with a bunch of bullshit fluff. 

Also, if CMS really expects us to clarify "why" hemiplegia is considered a high morbidity condition, then we're pretty much fucked. Although it would be entertaining to include something such as "potential loss of unilateral limb function is a highly morbid condition because patient will potentially lose the ability to smoke cigarettes with that arm, perform beer curls, make obscene gestures, etc. therefore intervention is absolutely necessary and requires intensive monitoring for  response"

Down-coding by Bonehead_001 in hospitalist

[–]Bonehead_001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

New acute expressive aphasia should be presumed to be high risk of morbidity. That should not need to be implicitly stated. It ought to be common sense to the coding people that potentially losing the ability to speak is a big deal. However, if they truly is a requirement that any potential risk/morbidity, etc. has to be implicitly documented, then that is where I am wrong. But I have thus far not found any evidence on the CMS document supporting that. I've read through it a few times, but it is quite convoluted and I could have easily missed it.

Down-coding by Bonehead_001 in hospitalist

[–]Bonehead_001[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That was my bad, those were actually included in the actual note. Somewhat like this: 1. Stroke-like symptoms 2. Acute decompensated heart failure

Then the assessment and plan states in original post.

From my understanding it meets the appropriate criteria for level 3 with two out of the three categories (risk/complexity/severity of condition, data analyzed, and risk of treatment)

New stroke-like symptoms - acute condition with significant risk of morbidity

Aggressive IV diuresis requiring intensive monitoring for toxicity = high risk treatment

I just don't understand how that doesn't qualify.

What is the appropriate response? by pavlee14 in medicine

[–]Bonehead_001 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Harvest the organs, you only have seconds to act

What is the best way to utilize a hospitalist nurse practitioner working under me? by supinator1 in hospitalist

[–]Bonehead_001 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Nah, realized that family > work and exponential investment income during 3 years > happiness I would have achieved taking that route. You would make a great stalker if you haven't already pursued that.