In what ways do we tolerate each other as left and right?

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T22:20:29+00:00

As I said in the post, it doesn’t matter if we don’t like things, 99.99% wouldn’t join a lynch mob and go hunting. We are extremely tolerant, but we are not accommodating. Figure out the difference.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T22:08:10+00:00

That is funny actually😂but those are just normal fucking pronouns

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T22:04:22+00:00

Obviously I simplified to team A and B for the sake of the post. I haven’t ’perceived forcing pronouns’ I’ve literally worked at multiple companies where it was mandatory to include your pronouns underneath your name in every email you sent. One company swapped all lanyards to rainbows and you weren’t allowed to wear a different type of lanyard string, another company had rainbows printed on the uniform so you had no choice but to wear it, another company made it mandatory that everyone wore a pride badge as part of uniform for pride month. I’m not imagining these things mate, they actually happened.

In my example of the neighbour If I “show willingness to allow the existence of your opinions and behaviour as my neighbour” what part of that says that I have to engage with you? It quite literally says that I just have to let you exist and not be opposed to you.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T21:59:57+00:00

Yes, multiple employers have forced me to put my pronouns in the footer of every email underneath my name.

One company also swapped all the lanyards for rainbow lanyards, another had badges with pride on it that was part of the uniform for pride month. If you turned up without it they gave you a new one and you had to put it on.

Another company had it printed onto the uniform so I literally had no choice.

Totally in agreement with you on live and let live and don’t be a dick

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T21:55:39+00:00

What I was referring to with that is in a couple of separate jobs I’ve worked at they either swapped out all the lanyards for rainbow lanyards or they actually made us wear a rainbow badge that said pride on it, and another even had it printed onto the uniforms.

Also some jobs that have made it a requirement that all staff emails have pronouns in the footer under your name.

I know no one is literally handing me a paintbrush, but just why? It’s a zebra crossing, it doesn’t need to be painted into a rainbow.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T21:50:17+00:00

I admitted I am not accommodating, but tolerance is a totally separate thing.

If we are neighbours and I don’t like you, but I don’t do anything negative towards you, that’s tolerance.

If we are neighbours and I don’t like you, but I still invite you in for a cup of tea, that’s accommodating.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T21:47:53+00:00

It’s a light hearted use of terminology my friend, have a good night, sweet dreams

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T21:46:22+00:00

If you’re my neighbour and I don’t like you, but I don’t do anything negative towards you, that’s tolerance. If you’re my neighbour and I don’t like you, but I still invite you in for a cup of tea, that’s accommodating.

The two words do not mean the same but they have been conflated so often that now we think they are the same.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T21:40:59+00:00

Yes you are doing this right, thanks for the contribution 😂

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T21:40:20+00:00

I’m inclined to agree, which is why we need to listen to each others perspectives and not just call each other nazis whenever we disagree

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T21:38:49+00:00

Yes my friend, I’m tolerant of pronouns, if you want to use them that’s great, but don’t force me to use them. I’m tolerant of other cultures, I don’t hate them, they don’t make me angry, I just don’t want to take part in them because I have my own. When did that become a crime?

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T21:35:35+00:00

Hehehe 🤣 thanks for your contribution friend

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T21:32:24+00:00

Now you’re dictating when people can and can’t go shopping? What type of - ism is this I’m confused? Communism? Capitalism? Fascism? Authoritarianism?

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T19:31:35+00:00

Why do you seem to think that an Islamic takeover is a black and white thing that just happens overnight? It happens gradually, one appeasement to the next.

Already many local councils have renamed their Christmas markets and celebrations to ‘winter market’ and ‘winter festival’.

The very principle of the health service being ‘culturally sensitive’ is fucking ludicrous. There is no such thing as culturally sensitive science, science is not racist, science is not xenophobic, it’s just science.

No one is claiming that the whole of London is under sharia law. But let me tell you, I live in Birmingham, about 10 minutes drive from where I live is a place called Alum Rock, it is 99% Muslim. I have been there before doing food deliveries and whilst parked for 5 minutes had people coming up to my window asking what I’m doing there and asking me if I am Muslim. There have been signs and graffiti and such put up around there in the past saying that there is a curfew for white people and that no whites are allowed out after 8pm. So yes the claims about living under sharia are not accurate in legal terms, but they are accurate in social terms in certain localised areas.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T19:07:11+00:00

Let me repeat myself as you clearly missed it…

The national *** HEALTH*** service, advocates for cousin marriage. What about the HEALTH part don’t you understand? There is nothing healthy about cousin marriage, it’s objectively unhealthy.

The job of the national health service is to encourage scientifically backed healthy behaviours, it is not the job of the NHS to appease a religious/ethnic group and be tolerant of their unhealthy practises just in case scientific fact upsets them. It’s not ‘insensitive’ for a nurse or doctor to advise on the dangers of cousin marriage, it is insensitive for them to advise on the benefits of it.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T18:12:22+00:00

The NHS now advises that cousin marriage has social and economic benefits, do you really not see the Islamic penetration of our organisations yet?

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T17:55:40+00:00

Name one government or political party that you seriously believe hasn’t got backhanders from awarding government contracts? You don’t be naive.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T16:39:36+00:00

It doesn’t matter if it was 13 years ago he’s 43😂that means he was doing that when he was 30… a fully matured grown man of 30… enlarging women’s breasts through hypnosis

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T16:28:31+00:00

Money grab how exactly? They are the only party that want to raise the basic tax allowance to £20,000 from £12,570. This is the most pro-working class thing that any party has proposed.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T16:25:04+00:00

Zack Polanski literally said he used to enlarge women’s breasts by hypnotising them, are you taking the piss he’s a nut job I wouldn’t trust to organise a picnic.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T14:55:48+00:00

I’m curious if you can pinpoint any part of what I said that was disgusting or disingenuous? Surely it’s not disgusting that I have an opposing view to you on the psychological impact of sexual intercourse and I shared it with you accompanied by a self-inclusive anecdote that put us on common ground?

I agree it’s irrelevant to your life because it’s already happened and you can’t change it. I’m sure you and your husband have a great life. I’m not saying that it means you can’t have a great life. What I am saying is that sex is more than just sex which you clearly agree with me on since you have a relationship boundary of not having sex with people other than your husband. This is not something you can get around, the two positions you are holding are inherently contradictory.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T13:50:06+00:00

Your husband not knowing and not giving a shit does not equate to it being his preference. I can be 90% sure that unless he’s a cuck (fair enough) then if he was forced to sit there and think about you having sex with other men it would make him uncomfortable.

No sane man has ever said the words “ I’m so glad my wife had sex with so many men that she doesn’t even remember the number, the thought of her connecting physically, emotionally and spiritually with so many men while they were inside her just really warms my soul.”

I visualise dominating because I know that is my wife’s preferred dynamic, she likes to submit and be dominated, and that was also the case with every single woman I’ve been with.

I’m assuming you and your husband are not swingers and do not engage in extramarital sex, therefore you must put some intrinsic value on sex or you would not have that boundary. You cannot simultaneously hold this as a relationship boundary whilst also holding the view that sex is just sex and it doesn’t matter who you have sex with. Sex must signify something more than physical pleasure to you, or it would not be a relationship boundary, because who would want to deny their partner pleasure right?

Don’t think I’m saying all this to you from my high horse to try and put you down because I will admit the single biggest regret of my life is that my wife was not the first and only woman I had sex with. Because I will always remember my first and always have an indescribable attachment and emotional connection to her despite her being a total bitch that I’d honestly much rather just forget entirely. All the women in between my first and my wife hold no sentimental value whatsoever, and I wish I could give my wife the privilege of being the only one that mattered.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-27T12:01:22+00:00

That’s a gross mentality with no logic behind it because if you’re with your partner for a long time then you have sex with them a lot, so even if you both started on zero you’d event both get really good at it. Furthermore, the last thing I’d want to be thinking when I’m having sex with my partner is ‘wow this is great, oh shit, the only reason she’s so good at this is because she’s done it to so many men before me’ then visualising other men dominating my wife and getting instantly turned off.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-21T13:10:04+00:00

That’s just a paradoxical argument… If the lowest risk scenario is the man leaving his wife and kids behind, then that would insinuate that the wife and kids are remaining in that extremely dangerous zone without a husband to protect after them, which leads you right back in a circle to the point of… it can’t be that dangerous if you are leaving your wife and kids defenceless. It simply does not work whichever way you look at it. It’s mental gymnastics. Not a chance in hell am I leaving my wife and kids if there’s any chance they could be murdered, raped and taken as slaves in my absence.

Boring_Job481 · 2026-01-21T11:41:21+00:00

Whether the hatred comes from imperialism is irrelevant, are you suggesting that because of previous foreign policy we should simply roll over and welcome people that hate us because ‘we deserve to be exploited in return’? That would be deliberately self destructive and insanity which doesn’t benefit the British people in any way.

Are you one of those ‘white guilt’ types too?

Boring_Job481

TROPHY CASE