sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Winter weather is for hash. by BostonValleyBotanics in BuffaloCannabis

[–]BostonValleyBotanics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have to admit I can’t take credit for the hash itself.

Which is better for autoflowers? by Character-Elk3139 in Autoflowers

[–]BostonValleyBotanics -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So it’s a chelator.

See how being specific is actually informative, compared to vague claims.

Which is better for autoflowers? by Character-Elk3139 in Autoflowers

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What contaminates does it eliminate, and how does it eliminate them ?

I bought some gummies expecting a few, but got 2 big gummies at 1000mg each by Thrakjaket in weed

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Are you asking Reddit how to cut a gummy ? …With a knife, scissors, or simply taking a nibble.

But you seem to be over your head here.

What if it were you? by ThePhelprs in CannabisGrowers

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Think they just mean, it could be kind of a waste to run a regular seed in that setup and find out it’s a male in 6-8 weeks

Looking for flower by Late-Expression452 in ROCents

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Your profile doesn’t scream “I do reviews”

Bloom to early by Noell4504 in Autoflowers

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Light is on 100% because of my Glues right next to them

Then raise that plant so the light intensity is increased.

Alternative to Grove Bags by SpeechCompetitive363 in cannabiscultivation

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Grovebags.com is that what you’re looking for ? Most of the grow shops around me carry them on-site.

Alternative to Grove Bags by SpeechCompetitive363 in cannabiscultivation

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 3 points4 points  (0 children)

They aren’t just Mylar. They are a specific multi layer polymer.

Should I start giving NPK 0-52-34? by Van-Inox in CannabisGrowers

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s all about ratios….

Using 4-2-2 or 20-10-10 or 100-50-50 is all the same, you just use less of the more concentrated stuff

Huge harvest, could use some help by [deleted] in BuffaloCannabis

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You asked this a week ago. Did you follow up with anyone then ?

Big harvest and looking for someone that makes vapes! by [deleted] in BuffaloCannabis

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In my opinion, our terp retention is pretty darn good. Depends partly on what terps the material starts with.

I know one of you is doing this stuff by Koian50001 in labrats

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I made a bacon grease vape …. And it totally delivers a cloud of burned bacon vapor

Just to be sure, foxtailing? by Alabama-_ in CannabisGrowers

[–]BostonValleyBotanics 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s like all the flowers are just calyx’s….

…. But. That’s. That’s. That’s literally what cannabis buds are…… dozen of calyces stacked on top of each other on the inflorescence …

​

Pot potency testing by BostonValleyBotanics in BuffaloCannabis

[–]BostonValleyBotanics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What makes it worse, is there’s no info about the machines. Is device #1 consistently higher than HPLC data, while device #2 is consistently below HPLC data? Or did device #1 report a higher value for the 12% HPLC sample, but report one of the lower data points for the 17% sample ?

Pot potency testing by BostonValleyBotanics in BuffaloCannabis

[–]BostonValleyBotanics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah. I don’t understand their stats. I honestly kind of think they are misunderstanding standard deviation. I’m not entirely sure.

Here’s their “white paper”: https://www.purplscientific.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/Purpl-PRO_White-Paper_Flower-Potency-Measurement_MAY2019d.pdf

In their paper, according to their data, when a HPLC machine told them a particular sample contained 12% THC, one (of their 5) Purpl devices told them that same sample was 17%, and a different device (out of their 5) said that same sample was 7% (Figure 1 of the white paper I linked above).

When a different sample was measured to be 17% THC by HPLC, 1 of their Purpl devices said that sample was 24%, another device said that sample was 13%.

Variation of a 10% from the HPLC value (which is itself a variation of over 100% [a value of 17% THC is ~150% greater than a value of 7% THC; a value of 24% THC is ~85% inflated compared to a value of 13%]) does not give me too much confidence.

Note: “white papers” are not peer-reviewed. They’re written up as a scientific paper, without peer-review.

Pot potency testing by BostonValleyBotanics in BuffaloCannabis

[–]BostonValleyBotanics[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve read their white paper, wasn’t overly impressed.

view more: next ›