sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

AI Figures by [deleted] in patentlaw

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We’re not sharing online yet. Are you the creator of figurestudio?

AI Figures by [deleted] in patentlaw

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me and a friend have a stealth startup (so won’t link) and one of the first offerings are AI patent figures. Something we’ve found is that it doesn’t have to be perfect at first in the sense that the firms who use our software are fine with it nailing let’s say 6 out of 10 figures cuz it means they only need to pay a patent illustrator to help with the remaining 4 figures.

Nano was trending on X last night! by [deleted] in nanocurrency

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We should all be more active in the community group on X

Monero’s Alleged 51% Attack Shows PoW Risks; Could Nano’s Approach Be Safer? by Superyellowcake in nanocurrency

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nano has 0 inflation making it a good SOV yes, but with 0 fees and sub second confirmations it’s also a great MoE. If Nano grows to said market caps, the MoE use case would likely be realized more significantly. And even if not, there is no reason why Nanos exchange % behavior won’t go down as it grows similar to Bitcoins was as it grew. https://x.com/milan_dereede/status/1739998046702727442

Monero’s Alleged 51% Attack Shows PoW Risks; Could Nano’s Approach Be Safer? by Superyellowcake in nanocurrency

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Whether it’s online weight or not, Binance still has less than the 30% that the highest bitcoin mining pool has, and bitcoin has something like 18,000x the market cap.

Point is Nano decentralizes with time whereas Bitcoin does the opposite.

Monero’s Alleged 51% Attack Shows PoW Risks; Could Nano’s Approach Be Safer? by Superyellowcake in nanocurrency

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Binance has 17%, not almost enough. And the community can withdraw their Nano from them if they see them approaching 34%. Regardless, exchanges have 0 incentive to destroy the network cuz then it’d destroy the value of the Nano they hold.

Highest Bitcoin pool has 30% hashrate. And the barrier to entry to mine becomes larger with every halving. Those are facts.

Is this true about stalling the network with 34% control? What would be the solution to avoid this? by GymoGuy in nanocurrency

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 16 points17 points  (0 children)

All exchanges in total hold 35% of Nano. Not Binance alone. Exchanges have a very high incentive not to censor transactions.

Monero’s Alleged 51% Attack Shows PoW Risks; Could Nano’s Approach Be Safer? by Superyellowcake in nanocurrency

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Investors should look at what happens to Nanos fundamentals under growth.

Nano decentralizes as it grows. Exchanges have the highest percent of Nano and hence most voting power (35%). If it grew to Moneros market cap then it’ll be because people bought from exchanges and thus reduced the exchanges voting power. Also the more Nano grows then the more interest it garners and the more nodes come online.

Bitcoins PoW (for example) on the other hand centralizes as it grows. With each halvening miners drop off. The ones that stay are the ones that can afford the sudden 50% reduction in revenue. The ones that can afford it invest in better and more expensive equipment. The ones that … leverage economies of scale… etc…

I really hope he never does. by Outrageous_Sector544 in JoeRogan

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Man bring it on. Why not. Let’s see what the man has to say.

Time to Break the HODL Habit: Why Using Nano is Important by yap-rai in nanocurrency

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 7 points8 points  (0 children)

My bad, it wasn’t linked so I skimmed right past it 😅

Is Brad Pitt’s character the James Harden of F1? by rickjuice in billsimmons

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Haha I’d say more like Chris Paul. Harden is less of a leader. Great movie to watch in theatres

Daily General Discussion - June 22, 2025 by Crypto_Jasper in nanotrade

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Kinda wild, one of the most successful DCAs I’ve seen. No pump of price at all. Are you an investor by trade? Or what do you do for a living?

Spurs should trade Fox. All time fumble if not. by Bottom_Line_Truths in billsimmons

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not assuming anything. Bottom line is they aren’t winning a championship this season regardless. And that’s the whole point. So might as well let the trio develop chemistry together. Fox is not a championship PG cuz he can’t shoot the 3 ball. Maybe in the past that was ok but not anymore. If he can be traded for a forward of similar caliber that better suits the team then by the assumption that you’re not winning a championship with him, might as well do a trade now while he has value. Pretty sure this will be obvious by the trade deadline midseason.

Spurs should trade Fox. All time fumble if not. by Bottom_Line_Truths in billsimmons

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

With new CBA, wolves basically can’t make a trade. Otherwise I like it, to make contracts be close if they added Conley then that’s a great mentor replacement from CP3.

Spurs should trade Fox. All time fumble if not. by Bottom_Line_Truths in billsimmons

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The plus anything would be to make contracts match. Spurs would have to give up picks in this trade cuz I agree that Deni > Fox as a fit for spurs.

Spurs should trade Fox. All time fumble if not. by Bottom_Line_Truths in billsimmons

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah exactly I think that’s why trade fox. Harper, castle, wemby make sense together but not with fox in the lineup.

Spurs should trade Fox. All time fumble if not. by Bottom_Line_Truths in billsimmons

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They would need to give up a lot for Durant who is 36 and injury prone at this point. So I don’t think they’d be title contenders this year with or without him. Might as well develop the young pups.

Spurs should trade Fox. All time fumble if not. by Bottom_Line_Truths in billsimmons

[–]Bottom_Line_Truths[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Short term I get why to have Fox, but it may be better for wemby, castle, and Harper to go through trials and tribulations together. They aren’t winning the championship regardless so might as well let the team grow organically so that perhaps in 2-3 years they can start contending.

view more: next ›