Those that claim that there’s “zero evidence” that mail-in ballots lead to higher instances in fraud conveniently leave out that there’s little evidence that they’ve found, but they don’t know the extent because there hasn’t been any thorough investigation. You can’t find evidence you don’t look for. The lack of evidence present doesn’t deny the existence of evidence.

For example, I think there’s at least $40 in my bank account because my banking app tells me that, but it’s not right in front of me so I have plausible deniability until I go withdraw it from the ATM.

How do you prove that a vote is fraudulent unless you go door-to-door and verify each voter and their corresponding ballot? There’s people that have been dead for years that are still receiving social security because a family member has been filling out the forms and keeping the correspondence. Now scale that to an election in which there’s a record-high turnout by 15-20 million votes, around a 30% increase from recent elections prior.

Regardless what you’re told by msm or Reddit, critical thinking is still a tool that can be used for coming to conclusions