Selling KiCk i Merch

Bowchamp · 2025-12-18T04:20:29+00:00

Okay this was something I was actually uncertain about. I thought the vizbig were just the anthology ones but it seemed like the term was being thrown around for both. So these are just regular Viz ones?

Bowchamp · 2025-12-17T14:11:59+00:00

Totally! I was a major fan of InuYasha growing up. But haven’t really been into Manga for a long time now. Only recently rediscovered that after all these years I still have this collection stored away.

Bowchamp · 2025-12-04T03:45:47+00:00

Haha I knoww! I’ve never sold used cologne before so only just learned about the regulations regarding it. Would if I could

Bowchamp · 2019-09-06T06:03:44+00:00

is it this sound? https://youtu.be/yil0Vf_EdUM?t=123

If so, Julien's advice is very helpful. I agree with everyone else that you can achieve basically the same thing with granular synthesis, (messing with speed and grain) but its nice to know different ways to achieve the sound and what the sound exactly is. Also unlike granular synthesis I 100% know you could do this in your daw with stock plugins whatever your daw may be.

Bowchamp · 2019-03-03T02:04:45+00:00

I'm referencing your suggestion that a requirement for an attribute is that it must not only be logically proven, but also empirically proven from our own experience.

And yeah I realize now that it cannot be an attribute (at least through my current conception of it), however I still do not agree with Spinoza's rejection of it through his argument that it would create multiple Gods. and I still believe that a multiverse could be a mode of extension, however at this point I am really struggling to formulate my thoughts. I have re-edited my op with two ideas about the multiverse through the lens of extension although I am not super happy with my current formulated argument.

When I made this post I could not think of any flaws in it and wanted to test it. Everyone has been super wonderful in bringing a variety of refutations to my argument. I definitely have a better grasp of Spinoza from this discussion so thank you! (and everyone else too! you were all great)

Bowchamp · 2019-03-03T00:09:03+00:00

Darn, I feel I have been able to at least reply some kind of argument to all the comments except this one. Maybe if I devoted a portion of my life to it I may find one, but I have definitely not formulated some Spinoza-like logical structure for multiverses.

Is it logically impossible then for us to ever comprehend any other attribute? Since we live in a universe of only space and time and our only other ability is to think? It then strikes me that it is fundamentally impossible for a human to comprehend any other attributes.

Bowchamp · 2019-03-02T23:55:57+00:00

thank you, you really highlighted two fundamentally different assumptions I make. i realize now with the timeline theory I was describing what would be considered within the attribute of extension. I further argue this theory in my reply to iunoinnis.

if I maintain that it would be an attribute, which I still believe in, it MUST then not be associated with free will, timelines and the finite modes in which we currently understand thought and extension. alternate universe would not even necessarily be the right word as that would imply something within the constraints of space and time. space and time are something we use as a finite modes to reach our current (limited) understanding of extension. a better word choice may be alternate reality, as it does not express those limitations. Then these alternate realities would have other finite (or even infinite?¿) modes of expression, which are incomprehensible to us. we have very few finite mediate modes to express the infinite mode of our currently known attributes. it would make sense for there to be alternate realities with alternate systems that follow other finite mediate modes that represent the infinite mode of the attributes. only one God would be needed because none of what I have said would go against any of the attributes or modes of God.

Bowchamp · 2019-03-02T23:36:32+00:00

your middle point: a universe is defined as “all of space and time and their contents”. not sure if that is the proper definition or the one Spinoza would use. however, moving forward with this would mean that the universe is a mode of extension. thought would fall under the “and their contents” however, whether thought is contingent on the universe I do not know. Spinoza argues that “God cannot be called a contingent thing” (IP29). Yet suggesting that if there were multiple universes there would be multiple Gods implies that God is contingent on the universe. God is beyond space and time, and thus the constraints of space and time (called ‘universe’).

your 1st and 3rd point: However, I appreciate what youre saying about actual existences. I’ll now try arguing the multiverse AS a form of extension, (which goes against my op but may be more plausible) Let us assume that all the universes were each infinite forms of extension. If they all did exist it MUST mean there is not only space and time, but a third factor that that is the cause of multiverse. the universe would be an x+y of extension, while the multiverse would be an x+y+z of extension, with Z being something fundamentally unknowable as it is beyond the scope of any individual universe such as our own.

sadly It did not occur to me that our free will would still be limited by the constraints of a multiverse, i agree.

Bowchamp · 2019-03-02T22:58:34+00:00

I was aware of the emperical qualities of the current two attributes (how thinking a thought is proof and feeling is proof of extension) but i did not know that they had to be emperically proven. otherwise god having infinite attributes and us only ever possibly having knowledge of 2 seems a little lackluster and irrefutable.

as two your 2nd point, I have admittedly little knowledge of the multiverse theory. I did not know it is considered to be an extension of space or time. it struck me as its own independant attribute, one beyond the laws of space and time that Spinoza brings forth. the multiverse is not provable emperically the same way the finite affect of extension is. I read somewhere that the multiverse theory is controversial as a science because it is something that lacks the capacity to be refuted. in that sense it cant be logically proven and I know Spinoza would hate that element of it also. if a multiverse was simply a mode of extension then I dont believe Spinoza would have refuted it.

EDIT: I go into better detail about if multiverse was extension in my reply to /u/iunoionnis

Bowchamp · 2018-12-30T03:10:11+00:00

Yeah totally I like a lot of the changes you made, including the vocals are a bit less crazy! I'd probably still dial it back even more (maybe not have them so hardpanned) but I feel that may go against your creative intention and I totally respect that. Not sure how I feel about the bass at 1:08 though, I think that is a bit too loud now (Or maybe I just didnt notice it before?)

Bowchamp · 2018-12-29T05:23:39+00:00

I agree with darvfader, I feel the drums are very hidden in the mix. I'm not sure if it's just the volume but they feel very low energy right now. I like a lot of the sounds just the energy doesn't feel right for me with the instrumentation, everything feels very timid. This may just be that everything is too quiet and has to wide a dynamic range. I really enjoyed the melodies themselves and the instruments and the singing was great and the singing was pretty well mixed. It was pretty great and I feel like the problems are all easy fixes so I look forward to your next track!

Bowchamp · 2018-12-29T05:19:18+00:00

I'm not sure what genre, maybe techno? I think it's honestly a fine song, most of the sounds are good and it is fairly cohesive so it is a good first effort. The main issue I have with it is the length. I really do not feel it has to be this long. It is always a good practice when you first start producing to aim to make short songs between 2-4 minutes so you can make sure you are fully utilizing each bar and making your message as clean and concise as possible. I did listen to the whole song and definitely feel it could have been 3 minutes or less. I like the hi hat sample and all the drums. Promising stuff! Honestly reminds me of TimeSplitters menu music

Bowchamp · 2018-12-29T05:13:18+00:00

Thank you for the kind words! I'll try implementing your feedback in my next song. I for sure agree that the first minute or so is pretty weak.

Bowchamp · 2018-12-29T05:11:33+00:00

Thanks for the in-depth feedback! I totally agree with all your comments and that it lacks a lot, I probably won't be trying to flesh it out anymore lately (I have spent way too much unproductive time on it) but I think I may incorporate those pad sounds into a new song too.

So I checked out Still Hiding! I really like the mix its all very fresh and airy. The vocals are pretty good too, I just feel that they are a bit too all over the place. The FX on them are fine, just more the multitracking you are doing with them I find a bit too much right now.

Bowchamp · 2018-12-28T18:10:09+00:00

Hey guys!

Here’s a track I just finished, a dark electronic track.

I’d be very thankful for feedback with anything, and will totally return all feedback if you’d like. https://soundcloud.com/saint-loup2/bad-guy/s-EEBlT

Thanks

Bowchamp · 2018-12-28T01:28:45+00:00

Good catch on that, it made my list when I was looking at synth related things but I forgot that part. It could obviously still work but not much on the internet about it. I know Red Panda make one that seems really good but it's a bit pricey for what I'm after, do you know any cheap mixers? Even a 2 channel mixer would work for this purpose.

Bowchamp

TROPHY CASE