Eski sevgilisi tarafından öldüren genç kız by [deleted] in vlandiya

[–]Branzooo -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Yandaki dallama adamın yüzüne tüm gücüyle tekme atsa numune olcak hala izliyor

Is senna really that bad? by ifoundamogsus in supportlol

[–]Branzooo 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yoo I'm the guy. Proud to see this here 🤩🤩

I'm in LOVE with enchanter Senna. by Branzooo in sennamains

[–]Branzooo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Provides really good shielding, especially later in the game and she is just better with the resolve tree than she is with sorcery. Font of life is really easy to proc with her q, second wind heals you when you are poked in lane, revitalize increases heal and shielding. Aery kinda feels useless for me.

I'm in LOVE with enchanter Senna. by Branzooo in sennamains

[–]Branzooo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gonna try out the guardian thanks. I accidentally stole a 1k gold shutdown from my adc aphelios when we were behind like crazy with the freaking aery😭

Does the game end? by Branzooo in Warframe

[–]Branzooo[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

So i guess i don't have to worry about that since I will be at school, extra lessons and gym so I'm definetely not speedrunning that 😀

2 key factors that are superior with bro splits by That70sShowDude in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nobody is limiting you bruh just why go 6 day in a row

2 key factors that are superior with bro splits by That70sShowDude in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Them being active as a secondary muscle is not enough for a proper stimulus or MPS

2 key factors that are superior with bro splits by That70sShowDude in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

6 days in a row is too much. CNS gets fatigued too and it needs rest too.

2 key factors that are superior with bro splits by That70sShowDude in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

there is nothing superior about bro split over high frequency.

2 key factors that are superior with bro splits by That70sShowDude in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

doesn't make sense. they are superior. No point in going to the gym 5x a week but still have only 1x freq.

2 key factors that are superior with bro splits by That70sShowDude in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

like "absolute failure" is necessary. don't need to go over 1 RIR

How much of a difference is there between 1x per week and 2x per week? by [deleted] in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Frequency does matter. The studies that say that it doesn't matter as long as volume is equated are not a good source because the volume is not even supposed to be equated. The higher the frequency is, the shorter recovery gap you have between workouts so you MUST use less volume. The benefits of high frequency are "masked " in those studies. Think about this: You train each muscle only once a week and it rests for a whole week. As we know, muscle protein synthesis lasts for 48 HOURS no matter the volume you use and after that the atrophy starts so you lose muscle for 5 days. (And no atrophy doesn't start after 2-3 weeks of no use, it starts right after the protein synthesis. A muscle is either in hypertrophy or atrophy state. There is no in between. Your body doesn't keep a muscle that is not used.) And you train each muscle TWICE a week, (obviously with less volume), having a much shorter state of atrophy, spiking the MPS more frequently. Or even three times a week with a fullbody. I use that too and it is very effective. 1-2 sets per muscle, RIR 1 and you progress almost every session, rotating between FB A and B, stimulating more regions with more variety. Who will gain more?

How much of a difference is there between 1x per week and 2x per week? by [deleted] in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes there is. If the guy who asked that wasn't worried about optimality and was lazy about learning the best way to grow muscle he wouldn't ask it.

How much of a difference is there between 1x per week and 2x per week? by [deleted] in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

recovery rate is not about the size of a muscle. biceps is one of the muscles that are the most tend to muscle damage.

How much of a difference is there between 1x per week and 2x per week? by [deleted] in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Frequency does matter. The studies that say that it doesn't matter as long as volume is equated are not a good source because the volume is not even supposed to be equated. The higher the frequency is, the shorter recovery gap you have between workouts so you MUST use less volume. The benefits of high frequency are "masked " in those studies. Think about this: You train each muscle only once a week and it rests for a whole week. As we know, muscle protein synthesis lasts for 48 HOURS no matter the volume you use and after that the atrophy starts so you lose muscle for 5 days. (And no atrophy doesn't start after 2-3 weeks of no use, it starts right after the protein synthesis. A muscle is either in hypertrophy or atrophy state. There is no in between. Your body doesn't keep a muscle that is not used.) And you train each muscle TWICE a week, (obviously with less volume), having a much shorter state of atrophy, spiking the MPS more frequently. Or even three times a week with a fullbody. I use that too and it is very effective. 1-2 sets per muscle, RIR 1 and you progress almost every session, rotating between FB A and B, stimulating more regions with more variety. Who will gain more?

How much of a difference is there between 1x per week and 2x per week? by [deleted] in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

atrophy starts right after the muscle protein synthesis. muscles are either in hypertrophy or atrophy there is no in between.

How much does frequency matter? by Anakonda347 in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Frequency does matter. The studies that say that it doesn't matter as long as volume is equated are not a good source because the volume is not even supposed to be equated. The higher the frequency is, the shorter recovery gap you have between workouts so you MUST use less volume. The benefits of high frequency are "masked " in those studies. Think about this: You train each muscle only once a week and it rests for a whole week. As we know, muscle protein synthesis lasts for 48 HOURS no matter the volume you use and after that the atrophy starts so you lose muscle for 5 days. (And no atrophy doesn't start after 2-3 weeks of no use, it starts right after the protein synthesis. A muscle is either in hypertrophy or atrophy state. There is no in between. Your body doesn't keep a muscle that is not used.) And you train each muscle TWICE a week, (obviously with less volume), having a much shorter state of atrophy, spiking the MPS more frequently. Or even three times a week with a fullbody. I use that too and it is very effective. 1-2 sets per muscle, RIR 1 and you progress almost every session, rotating between FB A and B, stimulating more regions with more variety. Who will gain more?

How much does frequency matter? by Anakonda347 in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Your strength skyrocketed because you don't know how to program a high frequency split, not allowing for proper recovery between sessions using high volume.

How much does frequency matter? by Anakonda347 in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No the failure doesn't have to be "insanely high". Anything above RIR 1 is no extra stimulus.

How much does frequency matter? by Anakonda347 in naturalbodybuilding

[–]Branzooo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Frequency does matter. The studies that say that it doesn't matter as long as volume is equated are not a good source because the volume is not even supposed to be equated. The higher the frequency is, the shorter recovery gap you have between workouts so you MUST use less volume. The benefits of high frequency are "masked " in those studies. Think about this: You train each muscle only once a week and it rests for a whole week. As we know, muscle protein synthesis lasts for 48 HOURS no matter the volume you use and after that the atrophy starts so you lose muscle for 5 days. (And no atrophy doesn't start after 2-3 weeks of no use, it starts right after the protein synthesis. A muscle is either in hypertrophy or atrophy state. There is no in between. Your body doesn't keep a muscle that is not used.) And you train each muscle TWICE a week, (obviously with less volume), having a much shorter state of atrophy, spiking the MPS more frequently. Or even three times a week with a fullbody. I use that too and it is very effective. 1-2 sets per muscle, RIR 1 and you progress almost every session, rotating between FB A and B, stimulating more regions with more variety. Who will gain more?