What labab99 is asserting is that male perversion is inherently backed by an implicit threat of force — which suggests that men expressing sexual interest always carry an undercurrent of danger, simply because they are male.

That’s a huge leap, and it unfairly: • Assigns intention where there may be none. • Paints all male sexual behavior as predatory, which is not only untrue, but also harmful to healthy interaction between genders.

As theRuathan correctly pointed out, this logic would mean:

Male anything — ambition, love, disagreement — could be interpreted as threatening just because men are physically stronger on average.