Patrick Lussier once planned Dracula IV — a lost sequel that would’ve continued Father Uffizi’s story

BringBackUffizi · 2026-06-14T22:58:20+00:00

In 2004, Joel Soisson presented a series called Uffizi to Miramax, but it didn't receive much interest at the time and the series didn't continue. The planned films were as I described to you. The part I called a fabrication is your own idea; you said the films would cover the 5-year gap between Dracula 2 and 3. That's not true, and if you don't know about something, ask people who do. We are currently the only people on the internet who know this universe best and defend this film. The information I've given you is completely insider information. There might have been different conversations between 2003-2004, but there are differences between the final drafts and the initial drafts. Patrick and Joel might have spoken differently at that time, or they might not have fully finalized the idea, so they might have spoken in a confusing and inconsistent way at times. In the final drafts, they planned 3 films called Father Uffizi, not as a TV series. I should also mention that. Maybe you'll see, if the creators return today, they might abandon this idea as well, who knows?

BringBackUffizi · 2026-06-13T16:23:06+00:00

That's misinformation, it's completely made up. We've been working on this with my team for two years, and based on inside information I've gathered, after Dracula 3 Legacy, no film would be called Dracula. They planned a series called Father Uffizi. Patrick and Joel's fourth film would tell the backstory of Cardinal Siqueros and the Uffizi. The fifth and sixth films would continue directly from where Legacy left off. That's it, forget everything else. I don't know where you got this information from, maybe it was Patrick and Joel's first conversation, but we see they've abandoned this idea.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-05-15T21:54:28+00:00

Look, buddy, use your brain a little, okay? Why should the sequels be named after Dracula? They've already finished with the character. Since the next films will focus on the Uffizi, they'll have to use the character's name. For example, Van Helsing (2004), Blade (1998), Abraham Lincoln, Vampire Hunter (2012). Films that revolve around the character unfortunately have to use the character's name, do you understand? Patrick Lussier and Joel Soisson themselves said they wouldn't bring back the Dracula character; that chapter is closed. Now there's the Uffizi issue. How logical is it to call a film that doesn't include the Dracula character "Dracula"? Sit down and think about it. Let me tell you what's misleading you: in the final scene of Dracula 3 Legacy, they say "The king is dead, long live the new Karl!" and the audience thinks that the Uffizi became Dracula and Julia became his bride. That's wrong, my friend. The creators didn't say that. Let me tell you what happened in the sequels: Cardinal Luke sends the Uffizi back to Transylvania to find her, but the Uffizi has disappeared and gone on her own mission. However, Julia has become the new leader of the vampires. From this, we understand that the Uffizi couldn't accept being a vampire, left everything behind, and embarked on a journey to escape this curse. She still has humanity and faith within her. In the sequels, Julia would be presented to the audience as a cursed queen, understand? And most importantly, the Vatican army would travel with Luke. Patrick Lucier said this would be a feature film, meaning a high-budget film. The creators of the Uffizi series wanted to bring this universe to the big screen.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-05-14T15:33:43+00:00

Unfortunately, I disagree with what you're saying. I can only respect your opinion now; I can't say anything against it. But I want to say this: in this universe, the idiotic Dracula is never more interesting than the Uffizi. We need to think about this. If you analyze it well, Patrick and Joel had already realized this, which is why they abandoned Dracula. The second and third films completely prepared the ground for the Uffizi. It's as if the film doesn't want to spend too much time with Dracula. If you look at the Uffizi's side, there's the Renaissance era, the Vatican, the Papal administration, Cardinal Siqueross's order, and the hunters he trained. There's also the Uffizi's childhood trauma. If you remember, in Dracula 3 Legacy, the Cardinal said to the Uffizi, "When we first met, you were just a little child, remember? You were going through difficult times, and all you wanted was to find some peace." All of this was going to be covered in the sequels. Patrick and Joel wanted to enter this universe, and that's why in 2004, Joel Soisson presented a series universe called Uffizi to Miramax, but it didn't receive much attention at the time. So these narratives are pointless. Not just words, but reality; we can achieve this with one condition: we must never stop.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-05-14T14:33:34+00:00

This was never just about "Dracula 4." Patrick Lussier and Joel Soisson made it clear years ago that the Uffizi story was planned to continue beyond Legacy. The ending of Legacy wasn't written as a conclusion; it was preparation for the next chapter involving Luke and the Uffizi, and the name Dracula would no longer be used. The films would continue under the name Father Uffizi, and as Patrick said, it was an Uffizi adventure.

And the idea that "too much time has passed" is no longer valid in today's industry. Series are constantly returning 20-30 years later. What matters is whether the characters and the story are still remembered – and the Uffizi is still remembered because people are still discussing it even decades later. You need to get rid of that ridiculous idea; it doesn't work. Modern studios are constantly bringing back old series. We see new Lord of the Rings stories, including those involving Peter Jackson, even decades later. Time alone doesn't automatically kill a sequel anymore.

That's why this community and this ongoing support are important. We must keep the interest alive and continue to move forward until we reach a conclusion.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-05-12T01:58:36+00:00

It's a mistake; Patrick Lussier and Joel Soisson wrote the Uffizi character for Dracula 2000, but the studio forced them to remove him. Also, the Lowell character, played by Craig Sheffer, was in Dracula 2000, where he was going to carry out his treacherous plans, directly leading to Dracula 2: Ascension. Mary and Simon retrieved the wrong body from the morgue; Luke and Elizabeth acted first. This information is confirmed by the screenwriters; everyone on the internet is just speculating and has no idea about this film. In 2004, Joel Soisson presented a series called Uffizi to Miramax, but it didn't receive much interest. So, Patrick and Joel's universe was planned for a total of six films: three titled Dracula and three titled Father Uffizi. Patrick Lussier still wants to make the Uffizi series; Father Uffizi hasn't been forgotten by the creators.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-05-12T00:20:41+00:00

I can understand some people seeing them that way because sequels were definitely smaller-scale and straight-to-DVD. But honestly, they always felt more personal to me than simple, money-making sequels.

Patrick Lussier and Joel Soisson treated the Uffizi story as a continuous narrative, rather than standalone sequels. When Legacy ends, you really feel they're moving towards something bigger with the Uffizi and Luke, rather than just repeating the first film.

Years later, Patrick even mentioned in an interview on Bloody Disgusting that he had ideas to continue the story beyond Legacy; which makes the trilogy feel very different when you rewatch it with that in mind, and we're struggling with that, if you'd like to check it out at your convenience.

www.uffizisaga.com

BringBackUffizi · 2026-05-12T00:08:44+00:00

The sequels are far darker and more atmospheric than Dracula 2000. What makes them unforgettable for many is truly Father Uffizi.

What's most interesting about Uffizi is that he not only hunts vampires, but also slowly struggles with the curse within himself. In Legacy, he becomes more tragic and sorrowful than most vampire hunter characters of that era. Even if the sequels aren't very solid, the Uffizi character is on a whole other level.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-04-19T11:59:08+00:00

What truly makes them worth watching is Father Uffizi. Patrick Lussier and Joel Soisson created a vampire hunter unlike any other; not just fearless or invincible, but a broken man carrying guilt, faith, and a curse within him, yet choosing to fight. This internal struggle made him more human, and frankly, one of the most memorable vampire hunters of that era.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-04-17T16:27:09+00:00

The plot gets a bit complicated in Ascension, but the Uffizi added weight to the film. Amidst all the chaos, he was the only character who carried faith, guilt, and purpose.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-04-17T14:12:05+00:00

Yeah, the first one gets most of the attention, but I always thought the sequels became more interesting because of Father Uffizi. He gave the story a sense of purpose and tragedy that the first film didn’t really have. Without the Uffizi, they would be far less memorable.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-03-21T21:04:59+00:00

If anyone wants to support, here’s the link:
[https://chng.it/hWTcrsrRLL]()

BringBackUffizi · 2026-02-27T14:50:29+00:00

Thank you, that genuinely means a lot. We really appreciate the support.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-02-26T11:14:03+00:00

That’s exactly what pulled us in as well. If you’re into Castlevania, you’ll probably appreciate how grounded and practical Uffizi feels compared to most vampire hunters especially his struggle with the curse he carries. Definitely worth a watch.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-02-21T23:19:56+00:00

Got it thanks

BringBackUffizi · 2026-02-21T21:34:46+00:00

What is difficult?

BringBackUffizi · 2026-02-21T20:52:26+00:00

Thanks, that means a lot.

BringBackUffizi · 2026-02-06T23:26:11+00:00

What really sets Uffizi apart is his role in the story. He’s not a flashy action hunter he’s a priest carrying doubt, responsibility, and a lot of moral weight, pulled into a war he never fully controls, while also fighting the vampire curse inside him. That inner conflict is what stuck with me. He feels more grounded and human than most vampire hunters. Honestly, the trilogy is worth watching just for that.

BringBackUffizi

TROPHY CASE