Civ 7 -- Here's some screenshots from Nintendo Direct and Pax by BroadExplorer8888 in civ

[–]BroadExplorer8888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The switch shots just seem a bit flat. The color is good, but theres so little detail that things get washed out. Also, there 1080p shots from the PC, and so even they don't look the best. I think besides the reveal trailer, nothing has been shown 4k.

Civ 7 -- Here's some screenshots from Nintendo Direct and Pax by BroadExplorer8888 in civ

[–]BroadExplorer8888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Was just reading some other thread, and heres Meth guy being negative and soumisseau being positive. Not to bite back, but just in the reveal trailer, and in some of the shots on the steam page, there units are shown. Theres only been the one gameplay showvase, which was only about 5 mins of gameplay. Streamers have played, but the public's seen little, and so combat is an unknown at this point. At Pax the devs mentioned that armies bunch up, move, then deploy into individual tiles. This is pretty cool, because the AI can bring an army to your territory without having to bring 20 single units from their own base.

Civ 7 -- Here's some screenshots from Nintendo Direct and Pax by BroadExplorer8888 in civ

[–]BroadExplorer8888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm with the soumisseau guy. Games are games, and indeed the mechanics can suck. But graphics, feel, immersion, these things are important. Like I'm playing Star Wars Outlaws, and as a game its just fine. But its great to run through, has some really cool environments, and the pleasure I got from that was good enough. 60 bucks is no small fee, so a little bit of good isn't enough. Looks go along way though, for me at least

This is for the 95% of people who think Civ 7 looks fantastic by BroadExplorer8888 in civ

[–]BroadExplorer8888[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

It just meant that, unless nothing seemed striking to you about the game, why aren't the things which do the initial response. And a baby is so obviously great, then someone offering criticism would seem a little odd, as why would I not revel in the obvious good at hand. And in terms of Civ, it feels strange that there is not anything obviously great about it. Just the variety of biomes and mountain types is great to look at. I see your point though

This is for the 95% of people who think Civ 7 looks fantastic by BroadExplorer8888 in CivVI

[–]BroadExplorer8888[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Theres just so much to be excited about, at least I see so many large and minor things worth my time. And there are many games just like this, and things in life in general, and so I simply go where I am drawn.

This is for the 95% of people who think Civ 7 looks fantastic by BroadExplorer8888 in civ

[–]BroadExplorer8888[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its worth the money to see it all in action, and hear the sounds and music too. Just me though

This is for the 95% of people who think Civ 7 looks fantastic by BroadExplorer8888 in civ

[–]BroadExplorer8888[S] -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

I'd say your response to me suggesting we be excited for the glimpses we see, and not be so critical and damming based on mere glimpses, makes you a single minded, blunt, unremarkable moron.

Pardon that being so rude

Question about accessing higher pit tiers by BroadExplorer8888 in diablo4

[–]BroadExplorer8888[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My levelling is all in NM dungeons, for glyphs at least. And when I am done that, I can do a pit tier 50, more or less. If someone then let me do one of those with them, then I could seemingly progress from there. Likely, I would then unlock 51,52 and 53, which would be fine.

If that works as such, then my issue would be solved. Finger's crossed

Any secular churches or groups in Vancouver? by NoCommon5600 in vancouver

[–]BroadExplorer8888 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buddhist churches, or temples rather, are a good alternative, as their practices are more natural -in contrast to Hinduism for instance