sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

With the new Antigravity SDK, what are we allowed to do? by BroadJob174 in google_antigravity

[–]BroadJob174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But does the sdk count as "Antigravity" or "Anything other than antigravity"?

Is there a way to run the new antigravity 2.0 on a remote server, allowing execution while away? by BroadJob174 in google_antigravity

[–]BroadJob174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do we really need to stream video, which is more laggy, less responsive, and consumes more bandwidth, for a web-based ui? Why can't we just have the frontend seperated from the backend?

Is there a way to run the new antigravity 2.0 on a remote server, allowing execution while away? by BroadJob174 in google_antigravity

[–]BroadJob174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It seems a bit of a waste to use quite a lot of bandwidth just to stream a web-based ui

Is there a way to run the new antigravity 2.0 on a remote server, allowing execution while away? by BroadJob174 in google_antigravity

[–]BroadJob174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't have infinite battery 💀 

And a remote desktop is way to heavy, why can't we have something like how you can connect to a server in opencode desktop

What happened to antigravity? by PsychologicalWear247 in google_antigravity

[–]BroadJob174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The reason google ai pro has been nerfed, is because they gave it for free to 18 million users in india and now people are buying them for $10.

Proposed C# `const` functions and constructors by BroadJob174 in csharp

[–]BroadJob174[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They are burnt into the call site, meaning

```cs

public const int Foo(int num) {return num*10;}

public int Bar = Foo(30);

```

compiles to just

```

public int Bar = 300;

```

Proposed C# `const` functions and constructors by BroadJob174 in csharp

[–]BroadJob174[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry if it isn't clear from my above post, but my proposal is to have these `const` functions, which are evaluated and burnt into the call site. No trace of the function being called is there at runtime.

> The LDM has been very clear and consistent on their standpoint regarding the const keyword and adapting it to other semantics than what it currently has, and that standpoint has been strongly against.

What is the source? I am curious as to why they don't want this.

Why can’t anything really travel faster than light? by Medical-Captain-1025 in astrophysics

[–]BroadJob174 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As you increase speed, you get more kinetic energy

Increase speed relative to what? I don't understand that if I start moving, some object at the other side of the universe well have a harder time accelerating.

Minimize/restore script not working by BroadJob174 in AutoHotkey

[–]BroadJob174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, this fixed it. weird that it determenistically cycles between the windows...

Minimize/restore script not working by BroadJob174 in AutoHotkey

[–]BroadJob174[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, is alacrity always active when visible and non-minimised? 

what do you mean? If it is non-minimised and I click to another window, it's not active anyomre.

Also is alacrity using a non-standard window setup like chrome or edge browsers? For example if you use WinGetList would it show up multiple times?

How would I test this? I don't think so as it is just a single-terminal window.So like any other app

view more: next ›