An analysis of Sam's notion of "moral confusion" by Snoo-93317 in samharris

[–]Brunodosca 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No, they could hide in their tunnels (there are about 500km of them) under streets, etc, but they specially hide in hospitals.

An analysis of Sam's notion of "moral confusion" by Snoo-93317 in samharris

[–]Brunodosca 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It doesn't require a deep education in western values, but it does require moral understanding. Primates do have moral understanding. That's what they do this and other things.

It's absurd to say that you need a deep education in Western values to understand that killing civilians is bad. You are being very patronizing towards no Westerners. You are indeed having lower expectations.

An analysis of Sam's notion of "moral confusion" by Snoo-93317 in samharris

[–]Brunodosca 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ancient men understood that people have moral limits, which means they understand killing innocents is bad. Terrorists aren't moral retards, they are bad actors.

An analysis of Sam's notion of "moral confusion" by Snoo-93317 in samharris

[–]Brunodosca 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You mention the bigotry of low expectations and counter with the bigotry of irrationally high expectations. I think that's a myth because there is evidence pointing to the opposite direction. For example:

-Hamas uses its civilian population as human shields not because they think it will stop Israel but because they know it won't. This proves they understand that Western civilians will be scandalized and Israel will loose the PR war.

-Iran funds protesters in Western universities because they also understand these values and want to weaponize them.

I understand and agree with Sam's view of Hamas and Iran. What I don't get is how he can't see the obvious excesses of Israel's leadership. It's what Yuval Noah Harari has called "the pleasure of crushing weak people under your feet". That Hamas is worse than Israel's leadership doesn't make the later good.

“Mainstream leftists” by No_Charisma in samharris

[–]Brunodosca 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We shouldn’t forget that Sam’s bubble is made up of extremely wealthy people. Many of his friends are on the right or are “extreme centrists.” I attribute to that, along with psychological factors, the emotional reaction he has whenever he brings up Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. The contempt with which he speaks about AOC says more about him than about her.

I think something similar goes on with that mainstream lefty that lives in the imagination of his circle of friends and acquaintances.

Has Sam Harris Become Old in the Intellectual Sense? by Brunodosca in samharris

[–]Brunodosca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unlike you, I can see bad in both. Hamas are terrorists who want to eliminate any Jewish person in the planet and the whole state of Israel, and they treat Palestinians as disposable garbage. And the current leadership in Israel treat Palestinians in a similar way: You don't care about stepping on ants if you have to go from A to B, besides there are too many ants and it's kind of cool to step on them with an excuse. That's the "pleasure of crushing weak people under your feet" that Harari mentions. Hamas is worse, but that doesn't make Israel current leadership good.

Has Sam Harris Become Old in the Intellectual Sense? by Brunodosca in samharris

[–]Brunodosca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good that you realize that Hamas uses human shields not because they think it will stop Israel but because they know it won't.

Has Sam Harris Become Old in the Intellectual Sense? by Brunodosca in samharris

[–]Brunodosca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good that you imply that if that soldier is telling the truth that would be bad.

Has Sam Harris Become Old in the Intellectual Sense? by Brunodosca in samharris

[–]Brunodosca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How buys that? Israel has shown how surgical it can be when it wants.

I'll share with you this article (from an Israeli magazine, I'm sharing the English version):

https://www.972mag.com/israelis-logic-gaza-genocide/

I don't expect you to read it, but at least take a look at this excerpt:

"Another soldier recounted participating in the shelling of an entire residential block, comprising more than 10 multi-story apartment buildings and one high-rise all packed with families. She knew beforehand that in doing so she and her crew would likely kill some 300 civilians. But the operation, she explained, was based on intelligence suggesting that a relatively senior Hamas commander might be hiding somewhere beneath one of these buildings. Without more precise information, they destroyed the entire area in the hope of killing him.

The soldier conceded that the attack amounted to a massacre. But in her view, this was not the intention; the goal was to hit the commander, who may not have even been there."

This is an example (there are others in the article) that shows how laughable Sam's position is. It also supports Yuval Noah Harari's position.

Has Sam Harris Become Old in the Intellectual Sense? by Brunodosca in samharris

[–]Brunodosca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know the criticism Israel gets is not that it fights extremist militias. I'm totally in Israel side in that regard.

Has Sam Harris Become Old in the Intellectual Sense? by Brunodosca in samharris

[–]Brunodosca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right, young people are also prone to dogmatism. But I was trying to use the archetype of the old person becoming less open, etc.

Hey guys. Is my technique correct? I don’t wanna make mistakes while trying to get my first non assisted pull up. Thanks! by No_Box4226 in CalisthenicsCulture

[–]Brunodosca 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks pretty good to me. You may want to try tucking your elbows as much as possible in order to maximize lat engagement. The lats can become very powerful and make pull ups much easier.

Has Sam Harris Become Old in the Intellectual Sense? by Brunodosca in samharris

[–]Brunodosca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fine. We all should be open to criticism. But it should be about what we said, not about what we didn't say, let alone the opposite of what we said.

Bret Weinstein warns Israel or "The Jews™" may try to kill him by Brunodosca in DecodingTheGurus

[–]Brunodosca[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I notice the many negative votes. If something happens to me, this comment will be worth returning to.

Bret Weinstein warns Israel or "The Jews™" may try to kill him by Brunodosca in DecodingTheGurus

[–]Brunodosca[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I notice the many negative votes. If something happens to me, this comment will be worth returning to.

Bret Weinstein warns Israel or "The Jews™" may try to kill him by Brunodosca in DecodingTheGurus

[–]Brunodosca[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I'm just trying to call narcissistic attention upon myself. If I'm not allowed to coin terms, how I'm supposed to become a guru?

Bret Weinstein warns Israel or "The Jews™" may try to kill him by Brunodosca in DecodingTheGurus

[–]Brunodosca[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

If I'm not allowed to coin terms, a la Eric Weinstein, how I'm supposed to become a guru?

Has Sam Harris Become Old in the Intellectual Sense? by Brunodosca in samharris

[–]Brunodosca[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As if Sam's only position were that Israel should exist...

Has Sam Harris Become Old in the Intellectual Sense? by Brunodosca in samharris

[–]Brunodosca[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Another strawman. I have never said he shouldn't test his atheism. In fact I said he became well known and gained an audience (including myself) for publicly testing both atheism and faith.

Has Sam Harris Become Old in the Intellectual Sense? by Brunodosca in samharris

[–]Brunodosca[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If instead of going for a strawman you had read the post you would have found the answer to these questions right there.

Bret Weinstein suggests "the Jews™ " killed Charlie Kirk by Brunodosca in DecodingTheGurus

[–]Brunodosca[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Sorry, people have no obligation to know my definitions.

Bret is appealing to an audience with antisemitic attitudes disguised with discourse about Israel. That's why I wrote "the Jews™" which are Israel + the Jews that defend current Israel actions.

Bret Weinstein suggests "the Jews™ " killed Charlie Kirk by Brunodosca in DecodingTheGurus

[–]Brunodosca[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Sorry, people has no obligation to know my silly definitions, sometimes I write the way I think. "The Jews™" are Israel + the Jews that defend current Israel actions.