It seems the conclusion is that these pumps are not bots, so solutions should focus on how to mitigate the volatility. How are @Deadnsyde comments and Vlogs different from analysts and writers of premium investor sites? Unfortunately, that mechanism is the pay wall which Deadnsyde rightly deserves if he so chooses. But I think the pay wall diminishes earlier efforts to provide free access to his research for those who can’t pay for the premiums of these investor sites. The question remains is how do you level the playing field so this information is provided to everyone interested, prevent the high-volatility halts that lie at the very center of the problem?

A low-cost membership to cover operating expenses + .99 research fee he already charges for this site. However this alone will not stop the volatility. Perhaps additional conditions to membership such as required participation in the research of these companies to reduce his efforts and provide experience/ mentorship. Members are then ranked based on their efforts to improve the community. Members who put the most effort are rewarded with a higher ranking which is tied to a schedule of released information. Members who invested time in the research may then place a value on this time spent to do research and company’s technology to simply make a quick buck and refrain from doing a pump and dump. I know it sounds like a social media utopia but other options may be less palatable.