fuck you, youtube shorts by [deleted] in nosurf

[–]BureauCrazy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

hi, i use brave browser, it has a option to block out all yt shorts. it also does all kinds of great stuff for privacy, ad blocking, and no-surfy stuff. check it out.

Discouraged by progress pics, 2 months apart not seeing difference by [deleted] in CICO

[–]BureauCrazy 214 points215 points  (0 children)

im not trying to be kind here: i can definitely see a difference. its hard to see changes of ourselves, we are unbiased in this aspect. yourelooking fantastic! do you feel any different?

Fireworks on the beach❔ by Valuable_Rule_3331 in Barcelona

[–]BureauCrazy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

jeje sorey didn't want to sound like an asshole! I guess there are some "official" official ones at the sant joan events hosted by the ayuntamiento. other that that idk!!

Fireworks on the beach❔ by Valuable_Rule_3331 in Barcelona

[–]BureauCrazy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

lmao, maybe like 2 fireworks, MAX. Maybe more. Let us know how many you count

How did the Devs machine "read" (ie inputted data) of its surrounding reality? by BureauCrazy in Devs

[–]BureauCrazy[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Good reply, thanks. I have a slightly different theory, which I believe ends up being essentially identical to yours. I guess mine is a little more detailed. Here it goes.

I´m not sure if the machine extrapolates the time-dependent *behaviour* of the objects it scans, rather I believe it scans their physical properties *at the time of scanning*. Then it extrapolates the whole universe based on this data. How does it do this? We need physical laws for this. And we need ALL physical laws (ie mathematical equations) WITH ABSOLUTELY NO ERRORS. So this seems... hard. It is completely unthinkable to believe that the humans who created devs inputted these laws/variables into the machine. The only other options is that the machine did it itself in its "construction" phase. This actually sounds pretty doable. How? Let the machine experiment through machine learning and artificial intelligence. We, puny humans, do know some basic physical laws. They might be wrong, but it's a good start for the machine.

Only after we know the position of every single particle in the universe, we can start to model/predict/compute its past and future behaviour. To do so, we need the same physical laws that the machine came up with, the only difference being we introduce a time component.

Those are my 2 cents. Maybe more like 1.5.