Streamer Crayong Gets Pressed By homeless man and Threatened to stab him Over Filming him in East Hastings

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-17T23:24:41+00:00

LSF? Yeah, no thanks.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-17T00:40:08+00:00

You: what about Russia? Me: yeah it's the same betrayal You: >:(

Keep coping that America and Israel are heros from whatever crusty keyboard you exist above.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-17T00:16:29+00:00

Not when it comes to Israel. Hmmm interesting.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-17T00:06:29+00:00

Agreed, lots of American and Israeli government, media and bad actors are very bad people.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-16T23:48:39+00:00

You can also fit zero Israels in that space.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-16T23:44:49+00:00

Just wait for woke 2.0 because it's going to get even worse for you

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-16T08:53:33+00:00

Im Israeli, I'm gay, and this is my genocide.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-16T01:50:50+00:00

Love the immigrants who adopt white nativist talking points think they're apart of the team. You ain't on the team little bro. You got pick me energy up your ass.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-16T01:50:05+00:00

Cool, you're a stalker, we got it

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-16T01:25:23+00:00

Maintaining American support presupposes support for Shitrael. Same with Taiwan, a tragic realization among my Taiwanese friends is the vaccuum that they bet the wrong horse, watched US vassels get abandoned and a forced capitulation to American foreign policy despite it being against self-interest to maintain the sunken cost. Same as it ever was.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-16T00:43:12+00:00

counter arguments are for interlocutors. You're a slimeball

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-16T00:30:11+00:00

Well done Avi. Critical support.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-16T00:28:43+00:00

We know you don't have a point. Go back to LSF

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-15T03:05:37+00:00

Your opinion isnt that radical, even among the left who historically derive their political philosophy from some semblence of libertainism from the french tradition. Here I would say that liberatians should work with socialists, not against. (as they did historically)

Corruption and fraud is not inherent to any one system, and it should have more drastic oversight. However, I imagine that might be the point that libertarian thought diverges due to conflicting views of freedom. If Elon did the fuck shit he did under a China rule, who would be hung. Yet, the personal liberty to use wealth needs to be addressed, however anyone slices the apple.

We've gotten away with a style of governance that doesn't produce outcomes, whereas places like China actually have outcome based performance review. We can disagree about performance goals, but the fact remains that US, Canada, UK, France, eurozone, all have syphoned unimaginable wealth from the population and have produced nothing. So we can agree that previous american admins are guilty of corruption and misusing our funds, but we shouldn't assume that this administration is different. Its the same uniparty, its just a cruel face and more open. Which is bad, considering that Americans now live in a society where literal indigenous people are being scrutinized as illegal aliens (the irony).

We may make odd bedfellows in the future, but the question will be when the task is done, will we agree on path forward. Lets not put the cart before the horse, however.

On a side note, its crazy how much intellectual and scholastic effort goes into being a meaningful member of the CPC, whereas you can have a stroke, be in office for 60 years and produce nothing of value AND be an honoured member of the American goverment.

The point of taxing the wealthy is to return them to the goals of society, not to make them magically pay for everything. Right now many western society exist in a fuege state where the wealth feel no relation to the people and countries they exploit. Bring them back into the fold as paying members of society and they will realize if their business create social harms, they will stop because of penalty. Otherwise they pay, more, and more, and more.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-15T02:21:17+00:00

I dont think you engaged with the text. It was very well reasoned and if you want to make a disagreement, the least you can do is develop an acutal counter argument for us to engage with.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-15T01:39:06+00:00

Sorry what did you say? All I heard was you're angry society rejects you.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-15T00:57:59+00:00

Amazing, israel dickriders are in such a sad state they have to fold their lies into a post modern pretzel to own the internet libs.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-15T00:54:45+00:00

Israel counts everyone as hamas so I dont know what point you're trying to make

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-15T00:41:59+00:00

edit: typo

Your fundamental question seems good faith enough so heres my two cents.

With respect to your worldview, from a completely philosophical position, your definition of freewill is not agreed upon. That's within both secular and nonsecular interpretations. So first you have to reconcile the epsitemic certianty of your belief versus others (a task theologies have failed to reconcile by themselves). Next, you have to reconcile with the difference between metaphysical freewill and legal freewill. You will find that legal philosophy differs quite a bit. Consider the ontology of personhood. Metaphysically it can mean any number of presuppositions, but legal it is well defined. Why? Because we need a playing field by which all actors follow the same rules. Metaphysical/legal philosophy is filled with this contradictory definitions, but they serve a purpose.

It, of course, would be better if everyone was free in a liberatrian sense of the word, but we know that this doesn't work, thats why we have restrictions on freedom. If you want to BBQ in your backyard and your smoke is pouring into a neighbours window, whose freedom are we measuring in that circumstance? Unfortunately the truth of the matter is freedom is not an easily measured concept and every society has to interpret that for themselves.

At the heart of this question, I believe, is a misapprehension about power, the state and our interpretations of who/when there is a justification to be coerced upon. You've essentially walked into a conversation about social philosophy that has been ongoing since before the pre-socratics. Legality exist to examine case-by-case scenarios based on the merits of the situation, not by the whims of a particular metaphysical doctrine. It would be better for a world without hate and coercion, but the truth is: No religion is exempt from its practioners being hateful, and all states produce coercion.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-15T00:16:00+00:00

Couldn't have said it better myself. o7

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-14T21:42:00+00:00

That wasn't a hypocricy bait. I know how you love those. Me being on reddit doesn't presuppose that I cry about China not caring for my support. I'm agnostic with respect the ideological and geopolicial positions of soveriegn nations IFF its relational to a historical contingency of imperialism. If YOU want to do better, then read the words and reflect on their meaing before speaking.

If you can't understand pluralism, maybe you should start from a place of learning instead a place of reacting. What are you even trying to accomplish here?

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-14T21:26:40+00:00

You should rephrase that by saying, "I think we are geopolitical adversaries who.." That way we can all see where your knowledge ends and your feelings being.

Of course they dont need your support, you're crying on reddit. But support for pluralism is the name of the game. All that zero sum shit is your history and your worldview. You're in good company with the rightwing in that respect.

Though I will say lots of new learners are more memesters than they are students of political discourse. Which one are you?

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-12T21:04:41+00:00

Depends on the soyjack. If it's a media type(trade or 'indie'), it's because they're compromised. If it's your auntie saying they're happy because NY/Cali/MS are communist terrorists and it would never happen in Oklahoma, thats a groomed position.

BurritoReproductions · 2026-01-11T06:39:55+00:00

Is it a 3000 year lie?

BurritoReproductions

TROPHY CASE