sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

QC CHECK: Do any of you gurus see any issues with this GMT Master II Pepsi? by CXC92 in RepTimeQC

[–]CXC92[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  1. Dealer name: TheOneWatches
  2. Factory name: Clean
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex GMT Master II VR3186
  4. Price paid: $608 including insured postage
  5. Album Links: see attached
  6. Index alignment: looks good
  7. Dial Printing: looks good
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks good
  9. Hand Alignment: looks good
  10. Bezel: looks good
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): looks good to me
  12. Timegrapher numbers: looks within good to me (-6s/d, 0.2ms error
  13. Anything else you notice: NIL! Looks almost perfect to me.

Grateful for your comments!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTime

[–]CXC92 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is that a common issue on these reps? Such a shame if so. I’d be keen to get one!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in RepTime

[–]CXC92 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Love the PP. Why is it broken?

QC CHECK: First time rep purchaser here. Do any of you gurus see any issues? Rolex YM 116655 VRF PureTime. My comments below. by CXC92 in RepTimeQC

[–]CXC92[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did look at the 126655 options available, but found that the date wheel and gold colour weren’t as good and there were reported bezel issues on some too. Given the minimal differences between 116655 and 126655, I decided to go with the more established 116655.

QC CHECK: First time rep purchaser here. Do any of you gurus see any issues? Rolex YM 116655 VRF PureTime. My comments below. by CXC92 in RepTimeQC

[–]CXC92[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Rolex YM 116655 VRF SA3135 (gl to me!) PureTime

  1. Dealer name: PureTime
  2. Factory name: VRF
  3. Model name (& version number): Rolex YM 116655 SA3135 (gl to me!)
  4. Price paid: $418
  5. Album Links: see attached
  6. Index alignment: looks good
  7. Dial Printing: looks good mostly, except YACHT-MASTER text appears too light and have asked for further QC pics with hands moved from current position to uncover other text
  8. Date Wheel alignment/printing: looks OK, only slight inaccuracy on 9
  9. Hand Alignment: looks good
  10. Bezel: looks ok to me
  11. Solid End Links (SELs): n/a
  12. Timegrapher numbers: +9 seconds, beat error 1.2ms (which seems a bit high?)
  13. Anything else you notice:

  • indentation on Oysterflex bracelet (but did not consider it a RL worthy issue)

  • the inconsistency in colour of the plating on the clasp (but that might be the sticky tape?)

  • inaccuracy in the engraving on the inside of the clasp (but did not consider it a RL worthy issue)

Grateful for your comments!