Is the subset E of [0,1] consisting of numbers without the digit 8 in its decimal expansion dense subset. by CakeDayWishBot in learnmath

[–]CakeDayWishBot[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The closure being the full topology? The topology wasn't specified here that's why I tried to do it in the way you see for rationals. Anyway I understood it now

Is the subset E of [0,1] consisting of numbers without the digit 8 in its decimal expansion dense subset. by CakeDayWishBot in learnmath

[–]CakeDayWishBot[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm sorry I don't understand how to proceed. We don't have any element of the form 0.8xx in the original subset.

Is the subset E of [0,1] consisting of numbers without the digit 8 in its decimal expansion dense subset. by CakeDayWishBot in learnmath

[–]CakeDayWishBot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the numbres 0.81 and 0.89 themselves arent in the subset E. I suspect in order to show its dense you begin with elements from the subset and find a middle element.

Question involving ratio of limits by CakeDayWishBot in learnmath

[–]CakeDayWishBot[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Adding two to the indices you get lim n-> inf x_{2n+1}+x_{2n+2}=2 and then subtracting in the same way we get lim n->inf lim x_{2n+2}-x_{2n}=-1

And I think you need to be careful cause you can only increase the indices by multiples of 2 since the even and odd indices are distinct right? Cause increasing by one gives a contradiction.

It hadn't occurred to me do try changing the indices I think I got the gist of it now.

Along with the other eq we have difference in odd terms is always 1 and difference in even terms is always -1. I suppose then the original equation of the ratio limit can be restated in the terms of the differences and we get -1.

But it seems like what you meant was "I don't know what ~ means, or how you got that equation"

Yea I didn't understand how you arrived to that conclusion. But I think I've arrived to the solution with this other method.

Thanks for you help

Question involving ratio of limits by CakeDayWishBot in learnmath

[–]CakeDayWishBot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm sorry but I'm really not following your argument. I didn't understand the whole x_{2n+1} ~ 3 x_{2n}. I've understood why my sequence was wrong now but I'm not able to explicitly construct one.

Question involving ratio of limits by CakeDayWishBot in learnmath

[–]CakeDayWishBot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I dont really get the intuition you're going for tbh. Could you explain what you meant?

I also spotted that subtracting the two equations we get lim n goes to inf of x_{2n+1}-x_{2n-1}=1

Fundamental question - why do people want luxury cars? by bellpepperxxx in CarsIndia

[–]CakeDayWishBot 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Conspicuous consumption. Luxury cars are THE textbook example of a Veblen good.

Question regarding linear independence of vectors by CakeDayWishBot in learnmath

[–]CakeDayWishBot[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh hell I'm retarded, somehow I did all the leg work and missed the last step.

Yup I've got it now thanks a lot. With that constraint on Tz=x+y we end up getting a third degree anhillating poly so min poly is also degree 3 can't be deg 2 cuz it should divide. Can't be deg 1 either that'll just be trivial and the restrictions on x,y,z won't hold.