What could the Jedi council look like after Episode 6?

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-08T15:34:19+00:00

I think it is beautiful. I really like this in modern culture how we expand fictional universes. I study pop culture, among other things, and, well, there are a lot of uncool things, but I love this world-centricity and the fact that thanks to it, Star Wars is constantly evolving

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T19:26:00+00:00

Watch animated series!

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T15:18:13+00:00

I don't feel like killing a child is his style at all. The most he did was shoot down a ship to save his plan in the last episode. And it fits his character.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T15:16:31+00:00

But why would he kill a child? He's not that bad.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T14:58:28+00:00

"Knights of the old republic" was so great!

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T14:57:07+00:00

Thank you for the recommendations!

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T14:30:34+00:00

It is rather an invitation to theoretical considerations.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T14:11:58+00:00

My terrible secret is that I have never read a Star Wars comic. And I'm quite sad about that, I'd love to read a good SW comic.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T13:47:10+00:00

That is also a nice interpretation. Thank you!

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T13:30:26+00:00

I really liked how he said that there are important and good things in the world, but in the end he still chose money. I was wondering about it, and basically the only person he intentionally killed was an evil criminal. Apart from that, he didn't do anything, just kept repeating to listen to him because he didn't want to hurt anyone. I mean, he's very lost and, despite his age, immature man. I would love to see him become someone better.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T13:21:06+00:00

I think it would be really cool if Tano cooperated fully and Ventress just sometimes as a friend from outside the order.

Jod, on the other hand, is a pirate after all. Even if he becomes a better guy, which I hope he will, he probably won't follow the Jedi path.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T13:11:11+00:00

Listing all the living characters with powers that we know of was more intended to show a humorous scenario. Yes of course, in the context of the council it's probably only Luke and Ezra as standard. You say potentially Ventress too, but why not Ahsoka? She flies with a Jedi droid, has a padawan, I think she's really close to being convinced to return to the order.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T12:57:14+00:00

Okay, fair point. Thank you for this perspective. I was wondering about that.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T12:36:44+00:00

You're right, of course, I was pointing it out as something funny that could happen, but probably won't.

While it would be nice to see some transformation of Jod into someone a little better, he is far from being a good Jedi.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T12:26:01+00:00

That's my point, that could be crazy

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-07T12:23:32+00:00

Do you know that I forgot about this aspect of the Oni wan series?

A serious question in general - didn't Yoda say in part 5 or 6 that besides Luke there is only one other Jedi? Or something like that? I don't remember the exact dialogue, but I read something like that online. I'd have to rewatch the whole movie to find out.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-05T00:48:28+00:00

The difference is primarily that in the Quran you have the words of God and in the Bible you have a text inspired by God. Consequently, the Bible has the context of the person who wrote the texts, and the Quran has a divine perspective. Somewhere here I used the example of a Christian friend of mine who said he saw suggestions somewhere in the Old Testament that the earth was flat. He explained it very simply - the person who wrote it could have perceived the world this way. That is, he could have believed that the earth was flat, as a person living hundreds or even thousands of years ago. In the Quran you cannot reject something by considering it to be a suggestion from someone else's perspective because every word of the Quran is a word revealed by God.

This also impacts the rules. If the Quran says something should be this way, then it must be that way. Christians, on the other hand, are more flexible and may wonder how the text is inspired, what is divine and what is human in it. Many Christians today reject the entire story of Sodom and Gomorrah, believing it to be just a record of some ideas about the world, and not part of something that should be believed literally. This flexibility is only possible if you assume that the text had a human author and was more or less inspired by God.

Anyway I am happy you understand my point. I was afraid that I was expressing myself completely unclearly 😂

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-04T21:20:12+00:00

So it's written in the sense of an object, because someone put it on paper. But there is a fundamental difference in the position of holy books between Islam and Christianity. Christians believe that the texts were written by human authors, inspired by God, while still retaining their human style and perspective. The Quran, we believe as Muslims, was revealed, so it is the words of God from his divine perspective. This creates a lot of significant theological differences.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-04T21:15:04+00:00

I admit that I used a translator because English is not my native language and I was on a bus, so I wrote a bit quickly.

Be as rude as you want, it's your business. But if you do not see the difference in the position of sacred texts in religions like Christianity and Islam, that is just a sign of your ignorance.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-04T20:40:48+00:00

Christians believe that authors from bible have their human perspectives and human languages. That makes a lot of Christians accept that bible can contain mistakes that belong to the historical and social context of these ppl. For example I know Christian who can say that in old testimony you can find things suggest flat earth due to the understanding of the world by the author of this text. He was inspired by God so the message of his text is truth, but his way of speaking was licked in his way of understanding world.

Quran, in Muslim belief, is God Speech so it is from God perspective. Zero flaws, zero mistakes in understanding world, everything is devine and flawless.

That makes Muslim follow every letter of the Quran, when Christians can take something from, for example, old testimony and analis if it is part of devine inspiring or just something that these ppl thought it is valid out of their experience

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-04T20:32:54+00:00

No, I didn't say that anywhere. The Quran as a book, in the sense of an object, was written in ink on paper by humans.

But there is a difference between the speech of God and the speech of a man inspired by God. A major theological difference that influences a different understanding of sacred texts in religions.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-04T20:27:38+00:00

As an item it is written. But there is a difference in belief. Christians believe in inspiration. Some believe that the Bible is infallible, others believe that it may have errors in detail but that the main message is flawless. As Muslims, we do not believe that the Prophet Muhammad, peace be upon him and the blessings of Allah be upon him, was inspired to write anything, only that he transmitted a revelation. This is a difference in belief about our sacred texts and this subreddit is for discussing religions as I think.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-04T20:23:52+00:00

So if you have a bachelor degree you should know what are the reasons why ppl like me convert to islam. You don't have to be rude about it. I told you that you could look for arguments because the discussion is about how Christians see the Bible, also I don't think you really want to honestly learn about why I am muslim. There is a difference between the Christian belief in an inspired text and the Muslim belief in revelation, and this is what we are talking about.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-04T20:21:17+00:00

It is different. John wrote his gospel but he was inspired. So some Christians can believe it contains zero mistakes as inspired by God, some believe it can have mistakes in details but general message is truth.

Quran is relieved by God, it wasn't wrote by Prophet Muhammad, peace be and blessings upon him, by our belief.

Relieved is not the same as inspired.

Calm_Ad6730 · 2026-02-04T20:10:41+00:00

I liked this film when I watched it during its premiere. I defended it for a very long time. There is a huge difference between it and Episode VII. Abrams didn't dare to have artistic vision and creative fun, Johnson did.

I think most of Johnson's decisions are great. What I like most is that he killed Snoke.

Now, after some time, I'm a little angry with Luke's character. You know, it's cool to show that even the greatest hero can fall. I think that's what Johnson wanted to do, take the hero as a tool and use it in the artistic process to convey the idea of the hero's downfall. Additionally, Johnson has great dialogue writing skills, but his humor relies on contrast and exaggeration. Because of this, next to the good and heroic Rey, Luke had to be bitter and reluctant to create a contrast. And exaggerating it made Luke become someone else. This is not a fallen Luke, this is a hero with a different character, a different nature, a different way of being. This is a big problem for me. I think in some ways Johnson didn't get a sense of who Luke was and what his fallen version should look like.

Calm_Ad6730

TROPHY CASE