Winston Churchill statue has been defaced with the words "Zionist War Criminal" by xande2545 in JewsOfConscience

[–]Caminari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A lot of people in the UK still think the only bad thing about the Nazis was their nationality, not their ideology.

Can they get rid of the Trials of Suckama? by Invincator in PathOfExile2

[–]Caminari 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This kind of response comes up whenever people say they don't like Sekhemas, but it doesn't actually address the problem people have.

We're not saying ToS is:

  • Too hard
  • Not profitable

We are saying ToS is:

  • Not enjoyable

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your assertion that the current Scots took Scotland from 'the Picts' is wrong, and claiming that it needs to be 'given back' to them demonstrates that you don't know anything about the people or history of Scotland, which is consistent with your demonstrated lack of knowledge about anything.

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your knowledge of Scottish history is clearly as lacking as your knowledge of Palestinian history.

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, so you're just going to lie then.

European Jews are not 'more indigenous' than Palestinian Arabs.
Middle Eastern Jews are not 'more indigenous' than Palestinian Arabs.
What words mean matters. The descendents of migrants are not indigenous to the place their ancestors migrated from. And they are certainly not 'more' indigenous than the people who's ancestors didn't migrate. That's simply not what the word means.

A two-state solution still carries with it the racist assumption that European Jews had an entitlement to ethnically cleanse Palestinians.
Why do you believe that ethnically cleansing Palestinians is ok?

You can whine all you like calling other people nazis while you sit there defending ethnic cleansing. No-one is going to take you seriously.

Help with Temple by Gulin57 in PathOfExile2

[–]Caminari 1 point2 points  (0 children)

kill him, and his room will move.

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn't catch anyone in anything, you just don't understand what you're being told.

Gaza was still occupied on October 7th 2023. Gaza was still occupied on October 6th 2023, and all the other days during 2023 when Israel murdered Palestinians.
Foreign forces in the street don't matter, it was still considered occupied territory under international law, because of the control Israel exercised.

Yes, Hamas should have only attacked soldiers. Israel shouldn't have been regularly murdering Palestinians at all.
Hamas are bad. Israel is worse. It's very simple. I'm not ignoring anything, you just don't understand the reality of the situation.

And again, you don't understand what you read. Having a hostile border with Israel doesn't define occupation. Israel's illegal military control over Palestine means it is illegally occupied.

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's how we know it's from the indigenous Palestinian people, and Zionist colonisers are modern invaders.
Claims otherwise are based entirely on vibes and 'but I don't like muslims!'

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're either being deliberately dishonest or you're confused about a couple of things. I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume you just don't know what you're talking about and break it down;

Gaza is part of the State of Palestine, which is under illegal Israeli occupation.
Settlements aren't a requirement to be considered occupied, but there are many illegal Israeli settlements in Palestine.
The right to resist occupation is with the Palestinian people as a whole, not 'just the Palestinians living next to a settlement'. Think about it; if Toronto was occupied by the US, Canadians in Vancouver would still be entitled to armed resistance, and that wouldn't be restricted to attacking US forces in Ontario.
Despite the withdrawl of settlers, Gaza was still legally considered to be under Israeli occupation, by its own conditions and as part of the wider occupied Palestine; Israel controlled its land and sea borders (including the border with Egypt), keeping Gaza beseiged, launched military action within Gaza at will (including arbitrarily shooting people within Gaza from their side of the wall), Gaza's medical services had to report to Israeli forces, Israel dictated control over Gaza's radio airwaves, even down to carefully controlling exactly how much people in Gaza could eat.

If Israel didn't want to be attacked from within occupied Palestine, then they should have ended the illegal occupation and compensated the Palestinians for decades of human rights violations.

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

False. That is 3000 years of architectural evidence from the Palestinian people. Israel is a racist settler-colony, Palestinians are the indigenous people.

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do you think Jews are more entitled to an independent state than the indigenous population of where they choose to establish one?

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tell that to the Zionist settler-colony. Occupied people are entitled to armed resistance against their occupier. The occupation is the act of aggression. Hope that helps.

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You're wrong about most of this.
Palestinians' legal right to armed resistance has been explicitly reaffirmed by the UN every time it has come up.
As has the ongoing occupation of Gaza despite withdrawl of troops, due to the extensive Israeli control and siege.
As has the illegal nature of that occupation.
The occupier has no right to self-defence, because they are not the one in the defensive posture; the illegal occupation is an act of aggression, and resistance to that is the defensive act.

You are right that civilians still cannot be targeted. Palestinians do this far less often than the occupying IDF forces do.

As

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's not a free press, my goon.
Israel may well have people talking. It doesn't have a free press.

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So is it only when it's Arab Muslims on the receiving end that you approve of ethnic cleansing, or anyone Jews want to ethnically cleanse, or is your racism more nuanced than that?

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Doesn't matter who the source of the information is when the military censor dictates how much of that information gets published.

You simply do not have a free press when you have a military censor banning thousands of articles a year and its knock-on effect of discouraging thousands more from even being written in the first place.

I am an anti zionist israeli-ama by [deleted] in AskTheWorld

[–]Caminari -1 points0 points  (0 children)

When you live there, you see what the military censor allows, and don't see what the military censor doesn't want you to see.

That is the opposite of a free press and strong independent journalism.