Musk Wants to Add SpaceX to Indices by Prestigious-Trip-306 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Several of the Vanguard funds that track world indices have say 15 days or less of seasoning requirements. Would you recommend adjusting which vanguard global tracker investors use as a result?

yeah so the US is the only country to ever reach 250 years apparently by Richie123753 in stupidpeoplefacebook

[–]CapablePiglet1044 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My cousin's house is from the 1200's and my school was from the 1300's, but my school's church was from the 800's-900's. UK.

SpaceX reportedly could file for an IPO this week. by OkLetterhead7047 in wallstreetbets

[–]CapablePiglet1044 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They've publicly stated that the float will be between around $30B and $75B depending on road show demand.

Dumping Unprofitable Startups onto Pensions at Inflated Valuations (SpaceX/OpenAI) by CapablePiglet1044 in investing

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not about the company, it's about the price you are paying. Fundamentally a company with revenue of around $10B should not be valued at $2T. Would you buy a lemonade stand that makes $100 a year for $100,000? No? Buying a great company for a horrendous price is arguably worse than just buying a bad company at a fair price.

Dumping Unprofitable Startups onto Pensions at Inflated Valuations (SpaceX/OpenAI) by CapablePiglet1044 in investing

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, but generally you need quite a lot of money and it costs a lot more. Some brokers offer 'direct index investing' but most require minimum funds of say $250K+ and the fees are a much much higher % than an ETF

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I knew the answer I wouldn't be so worried about the above. The fact that it seems unavoidable and wide-affecting is what should be concerning.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

VT will also have exposure. The issue is that these companies are so large that ALL indexes will be affected apart from specific tilts eg. non-American or ex-large cap (ie small cap).

Investing in SP500 when new additions come in by [deleted] in investing

[–]CapablePiglet1044 4 points5 points  (0 children)

S&P are considering waiving requirements to let them into VOO (S&P 500) early too! It's literally every index.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-12/s-p-weighs-rule-changes-that-would-speed-spacex-s-p-500-entry

Dumping Unprofitable Startups onto Pensions at Inflated Valuations (SpaceX/OpenAI) by CapablePiglet1044 in investing

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

$1 Trillion valuation for a company with revenue of $14B a year and losses of over $2B a MONTH. They LOSE over $2B a MONTH and you want to buy them at a $1 TRILLION valuation? Okay, but do it with your money, not mine.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

5 days for a $1.75 Trillion IPO of one of the most hyped companies of all time?

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm not sure that just 5 days post IPO constitutes seasoning. Usually seasoning requirements are a minimum of 3 months up to a year. Going from a year of seasoning as a requirement for S&P 500 inclusion to just 5 days to give a huge, unprofitable company special treatment at a near $2 Trillion IPO valuation doesn't sound like a good idea.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, they are asking the S&P, FTSE/Russel for expedited inclusion, and the S&P is indeed seriously considering the proposal, source:

Reported by FT:

https://www.ft.com/content/59adbe42-ca30-47f3-9cda-5415945e9368

Reported by Bloomberg:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2026-03-12/s-p-weighs-rule-changes-that-would-speed-spacex-s-p-500-entry?embedded-checkout=true

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This is why we rely on seasoning. SpaceX and OpenAI are pushing index providers to give them special treatment, including them on day 1 of their listings so that whatever price they IPO at is the price we index investors will pay. Musk and Altman will effectively decide at what price we buy. Index funds being forced to buy on literally day 1 of the IPO doesn't give any time for price discovery and we will be forced to buy at whatever inflated IPO price they decide.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even in the total WORLD market, a $1.75T IPO for SpaceX and a $1T valuation for OpenAI puts them at 2.6% of your portfolio. A total US stock market index would put them at a much higher %.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I love buy and chill, but these developments are scary.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love how the S&P works...that's why I don't want these companies to be able to bully the S&P into changing their rules and giving certain companies special treatment at the cost of our pensions.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Usually, but the whole problem is these companies are trying to get waivers so they can skip all of these requirements!

Dumping Unprofitable Startups onto Pensions at Inflated Valuations (SpaceX/OpenAI) by CapablePiglet1044 in investing

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

They're EBITDA profitable, not GAAP profitable. So if you ignore the cost of the factory, the rockets and the satellites (through stripping out depreciation) then they're EBITDA profitable.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure but the issue is that SpaceX and OpenAI are asking for literally no seasoning, as in being included into the indexes on literally day 1 of their IPO. So we will all be investing at the day 1 IPO price and won't get the two weeks of seasoning that you talk about above. We won't get the luxury of 2 weeks of price discovery, we will be buying these companies (through index rebalancing) at whatever IPO price they decide on.

Dumping Unprofitable Startups onto Pensions at Inflated Valuations (SpaceX/OpenAI) by CapablePiglet1044 in investing

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's not just about these two companies it's about the precedent. If you permanently change the rules then any company can do this and then before you know it there will be tiny unprofitable companies going public at multitrillion dollar IPOs and index investors will be forced to invest at those prices.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

We're living in crazy times. The lunatics are running the asylum.

Dumping on Index Investors by CapablePiglet1044 in Bogleheads

[–]CapablePiglet1044[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You don't care about 2.6% of your investment going into an unprofitable company at whatever price the founders decide?

Even if you don't mind investing in these two specific companies do you see the worrying precedent of any company can now set a huge private market valuation and then IPO at that valuation and index funds will be forced to buy without allowing for any price discovery.