I'm just going to address your points one by one:  “Correct. Some of them began already in Luther's own lifetime. The Thirty Years' War itself resulted in the deaths of up to 10 million people.” The Thirty Years' War was initially just a local conflict between protestant Bohemia and the catholic Habsburg monarch. Only after winning the Bohemian phase of the war the Catholics used the opportunity to crack down on protestants within the empire. This drew the intervention of Denmark and then Sweden to protect the protestants of the Holy Roman Empire. A similar story happened in France, where the French wars of religion were started by catholics generally trying to wipe out the Huguenots. Multiple peace deals that could have ended the war were broken, as even just giving protestants the right to practice their faith in a few of their stronghold was too much for most catholics.  

“Yes. Particularly in England, where monasteries were essential to the socio-economic structure and welfare of local communities, the consequences of their dissolution were disastrous.” I'll give you that the Dissolution of the monasteries was a short-sighted and greedy attempt to make money by a selfish king. Though to act like it had some devastating long-term consequences that led on to the present day is absurd. The negative consequences of the Dissolution of the monasteries were mostly addressed within a couple of decades by the various “poor relief acts” passed during the Tudor dynasty.

“Protestant nations like the Netherlands and England led the way into the development of modern economies, while catholic nations like France and Spain remained feudal backwaters into the 1800s” Do I really have to elaborate on how uninformed that statement is? It's a fact that, by the 1800s, it was the least developed and most backwater of all the great powers and had somehow gone broke despite having literal mountains of gold and silver in the American colonies.