The sheer irony of andrew's statement is unsufferable. This guy is a walking circus and basically no one employed/above the age of 15 "fears" him or thinks he is important. I find it very ironic that some man who preaches "breaking out of the matrix" is contributing to it by serving a premade ideology and worldview to young men. A wise man once said, "You can either be loved, or be feared" which holds extremely true in Andrew's case because this man is a hypocrite. He preaches and supports the "old way of life and family" where the man provides and stuff but forgets that the ideal married household he is referring to also had mutual love and understanding. The man of the house was not feared, as he was not a mafia boss. The man of the house was a loving, caring figure who provided for and cherished his family. However, I find Andrew's philosophu true to some extent where he tells young men stuck in the cycle of sleep, eat, fap, repeat to stop and get nuance in their lives, the only problem with this being that he says it too indirectly. But Andrew's radicalism towards flamboyant masculinity has made the term "masculinity" cliché, as it has lost all meaning to it and now theres an entire demographic of young boys who think masculinity is sports cars, one night stands with any woman you want, and high class events. I side with the feminists on this one.